MArin Quad Suspensi...
 

[Closed] MArin Quad Suspension - what was he thinking?

12 Posts
11 Users
0 Reactions
93 Views
Posts: 13819
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Have a Marin Quake here beside me, doing some fettling for a friend.

Looking at the suspension layout, etc - from what I can see, the wheel moves forward as the suspension compresses - surely that's exactly what you don't want?

Aside from that, it's all an impressively complex setup. If a battleship had suspension, I bet it would use a linkage like this.


 
Posted : 01/07/2013 1:25 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Have you ridden it? It works very well.


 
Posted : 01/07/2013 1:28 pm
Posts: 8177
Free Member
 

the wheel moves forward as the suspension compresses

Isn't that exactly what happens with a single pivot? Up and forward?


 
Posted : 01/07/2013 1:45 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I have the QUAD & QUAD II systems, both very good designs.


 
Posted : 01/07/2013 1:48 pm
Posts: 251
Full Member
 

I thought it moved backward to start with?


 
Posted : 01/07/2013 1:48 pm
Posts: 13819
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Pik n Mix - Member

Have you ridden it? It works very well.

No, just sat here looking at it and trying to understand it.

woody2000 - Member

Isn't that exactly what happens with a single pivot? Up and forward?

Yes, sort of - the wheel moves in a fixed arc around the pivot. This (to my eye) looks to amplify that forward movement with the double linkage.


 
Posted : 01/07/2013 1:56 pm
Posts: 6480
Free Member
 

Better than the Whyte Prst1 front ends which moved backwards as it compressed. 😯


 
Posted : 01/07/2013 1:56 pm
Posts: 13819
Free Member
Topic starter
 

scruff - Member

Better than the Whyte Prst1 front ends which moved backwards as it compressed.

I saw someone riding one of those once. Looked an absolute nightmare.


 
Posted : 01/07/2013 2:01 pm
Posts: 538
Free Member
 

Actually, first 30% of travel has a rearward movement. After that it's all forward but viewed at the axle rather than on a graph it looks almost vertical due to the forward/rearward elements being pretty small. Check it out in Linkage software, it's well handy for sounding brainy on t'internet.


 
Posted : 01/07/2013 2:05 pm
 IHN
Posts: 19908
Full Member
 

[i]I saw someone riding one of those once. Looked an absolute nightmare. [/i]

IIRC, they got rave reviews at the time.


 
Posted : 01/07/2013 2:22 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

They did. I dug up the copy of MTB Something where Guy K tested (and loved) it the other day.


 
Posted : 01/07/2013 2:28 pm
Posts: 3351
Free Member
 

I have a Quad II bike and it's flippin' brilliant. As has already been pointed out, the rear suspension extends slightly under pedalling (remember that sag setting is tres important with QUAD II bikes), which would point to a slight rearward movement in the initial part of travel. Both links are of unequal length, which compresses the shock without pulling the axle path too far forwards in the later portion of travel.

It's not uncommon, have a look at the shock placement on Specialized bikes and have a think about how the shock is actuated.


 
Posted : 01/07/2013 2:36 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I demo'ed a whyte 120 last year and thought it was brilliant. I couldn't get round the awful looks, so it was excuded from my choices.


 
Posted : 01/07/2013 2:41 pm