Long travel bikes -...
 

[Closed] Long travel bikes - what's the point?

Posts: 0
Full Member
Topic starter
 

I can see why you'd want forks up to 150mm, and 100mm at the back, but unless doing 3m drops or huge gaps why would you ever need any more?


 
Posted : 20/01/2012 9:59 am
Posts: 8
Free Member
 

Here we go again...


 
Posted : 20/01/2012 10:01 am
Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

Want not need.

/THREAD CLOSED/


 
Posted : 20/01/2012 10:09 am
Posts: 0
Full Member
Topic starter
 

ok, why would you "want"!


 
Posted : 20/01/2012 10:12 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Because we can?


 
Posted : 20/01/2012 10:12 am
Posts: 0
Full Member
Topic starter
 

I'm only asking cos I think I'd like a frame with 100mm at the back and 150 at the front!


 
Posted : 20/01/2012 10:13 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

My tandem needs a 150 mm fork - for ride height and to absorb big impacts while retaining some small bump sensitivity ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 20/01/2012 10:13 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm only asking cos I think I'd like a frame with 100mm at the back and 150 at the front!

get hold of a cotic hemlock - they're ace.


 
Posted : 20/01/2012 10:14 am
 wors
Posts: 3796
Full Member
 

I'm only asking cos I think I'd like a frame with 100mm at the back and 150 at the front!

Don't think you'll find many like that, i reckon 130 fork, 110 rear is where it's at ala Orange st4


 
Posted : 20/01/2012 10:18 am
Posts: 3351
Free Member
 

I've got one, it's a skills compensator innit! Bloody great fun to ride though.

Garibaldi?


 
Posted : 20/01/2012 10:27 am
Posts: 8740
Full Member
 

So I can sit down and ride over logs/rocks/small children, with only 100mm at the back you may as well be on a hardtail for anything but trail buzz.


 
Posted : 20/01/2012 11:39 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Isn't the optimal set up a long travel fork wound down to something like 120m, you've got the bling but are able to prove you don't need it ?


 
Posted : 20/01/2012 12:34 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

ok, why would you "want"!

Why not? They're not particularly heavy, pedal well and add a bunch of versatility. A decent LT will be at home on normal XC, some DH and visits to places like the alps, BC etc.

Anyway, look at the Ragley 10-4. Not sure when it's available though.


 
Posted : 20/01/2012 12:38 pm
Posts: 41786
Free Member
 

but unless doing 3m drops or huge gaps why would you ever need any more?

My fractured radius says 150mm wasn't enough skills copensation on my last gap jump ๐Ÿ™


 
Posted : 20/01/2012 12:42 pm
Posts: 6985
Free Member
 

tinas, snap, literally
ok, not literally it was 140mm

you posted that frame yet?

OP - my long travel bike puts a smile on my face even if i only ride it out of the shed door.


 
Posted : 20/01/2012 12:59 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

What's the point in riding a short travel bike when you can go play on a long travel one?? ๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 20/01/2012 1:09 pm
Posts: 16140
Free Member
 

"So I can sit down and ride over logs/rocks/small children, with only 100mm at the back you may as well be on a hardtail for anything but trail buzz."

I suggest you have a go on an Anthem X (100mm) just as comfy at the back, if not more so than my previous 130mm travel bike, and yes the old one was set up properly.


 
Posted : 20/01/2012 1:13 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Great thread. Ask a question in the title:

Long travel bikes - what's the point?

...then answer yourself before anyone else joins in:

...doing 3m drops or huge gaps...

๐Ÿ˜†


 
Posted : 20/01/2012 1:14 pm
Posts: 492
Full Member
 

My bike does have 160 on the front and 100 on the back. Well i say my bike, technically it's our bike. Ventana tandem!

http://www.ventanausa.com/frame_elconquistadorss.html


 
Posted : 20/01/2012 1:26 pm