Forum menu
lightweight road to...
 

[Closed] lightweight road touring set up?

 ton
Posts: 24279
Full Member
Topic starter
 
[#2604530]

saddlebag, single pannier or racktop bag.


 
Posted : 27/03/2011 9:45 pm
Posts: 6853
Full Member
 

I'd say definately rack, probably with single pannier (or two small ones), giving the option for rack top luggage.
Or, credit card in jersey pocket.


 
Posted : 27/03/2011 9:48 pm
Posts: 2006
Free Member
 

I'm going to trial a pair of front rollers on the back


 
Posted : 27/03/2011 10:11 pm
Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

if you've got a rack then it don't matter, otherwise saddlebag.


 
Posted : 27/03/2011 10:23 pm
 mlke
Posts: 34
Free Member
 

Saddle bags work very well in my opinion. Good balance for luggage.
They are not cool though and are best with a brooks type saddle.


 
Posted : 27/03/2011 10:32 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Handlebar bag and a racktop bag works for me. I've been thinking of replacing the latter with a decent saddle bag though, then I don't need the rack.


 
Posted : 27/03/2011 11:11 pm
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

Depends on how far.

If you're stopping over night or for a few days, rack with single pannier.
All dayer, just a saddle bag.
Actually I reckon you could easy do an all dayer with just stuff in your pockets. That's how I ride nowadays.


 
Posted : 27/03/2011 11:24 pm
Posts: 9965
Full Member
 

Single pannier if its all you need, works just fine. Never really used a saddle bag....


 
Posted : 28/03/2011 8:35 am
 kilo
Posts: 6923
Free Member
 

Wife and I use these;

http://www.carradice.co.uk/index.php?page_id=product&under=range&product_id=37

using this;

http://www.carradice.co.uk/products/other/sqrclamp

primarily used for commuting but ideal for light touring, come of the bike in a moment and very hard wearing bags


 
Posted : 28/03/2011 9:10 am
 Bez
Posts: 7441
Full Member
 

Saddle bag is popular on the CTC forum but I suspect attaching a suitably large one to many modern saddles may be tricky.

An aluminium rack doesn't weigh enough to worry about IMO, and you can get racktop bags with side fittings that unzip and collapse out as mini-panniers, which is probably the most versatile option if the racktop bit is big enough.

I'd certainly always have a bar bag for touring, so if you can get away with one of those and a largish saddle bag then that seems the easiest option, though personally I doubt I'd want to tour for more than three or four days with less kit than would require at least one decent-sized rack-mounted bag.

Since when did an all-dayer qualify as touring? That's just a ride ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 28/03/2011 9:14 am
Posts: 36
Free Member
 

Ahem:
http://pompinos.blogspot.com/index.html#114613054513476492

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 28/03/2011 9:17 am
 Bez
Posts: 7441
Full Member
 

kilo,

The Carradice stuff always looks nice. How does a fully loaded Nelson handle when you're out of the saddle on steep climbs?


 
Posted : 28/03/2011 9:17 am
Posts: 36
Free Member
 

bez - Id recommend the SQR mount for the carradice bags because it helps keep it all more taut as well as off the backs of your thighs. Not to mention makes it all quick release.
I still use mine for commuting.


 
Posted : 28/03/2011 9:20 am
Posts: 54
Free Member
 

Front roller on the back and a bar bag for 2 day winter tour...

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 28/03/2011 9:21 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I use a roll bag on top of a rack and a bar bag for valuables and mapping. I prefer the roll bag as it's a bit more aero, which you'll notice going into a headwind for a day!


 
Posted : 28/03/2011 9:25 am
 Bez
Posts: 7441
Full Member
 

Yeah, the SQR looks nice, hadn't seen that before. Looks a winning setup for 3-4 day trips if not longer.


 
Posted : 28/03/2011 9:27 am
Posts: 36
Free Member
 

Looks a winning setup for 3-4 day trips if not longer.

was a great setup for 2.5 months/5,000km ๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 28/03/2011 9:30 am
 Bez
Posts: 7441
Full Member
 

Heh - I find every time I pack I pack a bit less, I need to do more trips ๐Ÿ™‚

How is the out-of-the-saddle thing, then? Can't imagine you were sitting down on the hills with loaded singlespeeds ๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 28/03/2011 9:36 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 28/03/2011 9:42 am
Posts: 36
Free Member
 

out of saddle is fine as long as you're not flopping the bike around like a BMX grommet. 49x21=63 gear inches so anything less than 10% was doable and after the first 500 miles to get leg strength up, hills were'nt threatening anymore!


 
Posted : 28/03/2011 9:50 am
 kilo
Posts: 6923
Free Member
 

"kilo,

The Carradice stuff always looks nice. How does a fully loaded Nelson handle when you're out of the saddle on steep climbs? "

As mentioned with the sqr fitting it doesn't seem to have any adverse handling effect the fitting holds it rigid.


 
Posted : 28/03/2011 9:56 am
Posts: 11845
Full Member
 

If I'm doing more than one day on the racer I'll use a 2.7l Ortlieb saddle bag, fits my specialized Romin saddle fine and is about as Aero as you can get, isn't even very visible when you're sat down. If I wanted to go a bit further I reckon I'd stick a handlebar bag on, and use my back pockets.

If I started using panniers etc it would kind of negate the point of using a nice racing bike so I'd just take the cross bike instead, but then I have the luxury of choice in that respect.


 
Posted : 28/03/2011 9:56 am
Posts: 41848
Free Member
 

I'm tempted to try credit card touring with a top tube bag (aka Tri bag?) and saddle bag on the racer.

Whilst probably capable of service intervals that would put VAG group cars to shame the tourer just isn't as fun to ride.


 
Posted : 28/03/2011 10:11 am