Forum menu
LED lights. Are the...
 

[Closed] LED lights. Are they actually any better?

Posts: 19914
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#935954]

Than a decent HID?
Well, they are in theory more robust and can be dimmed easier, I'll give you that.
But in use, I'm not so sure.

On my last night ride we crossed a big open area and the guy next to me was using 2 of those new Lumi LEDs, with a flood and a spot, both turned on. I asked him to cover them so I could compare them to the L&M ARC I was using.
To be honest, I'd got a better, wider, more even beam, more penetration and just as much brightness. From an outdated 3 year old light you can pick up for just over £100 off Ebay.....

Just a thought......
🙂


 
Posted : 09/10/2009 9:10 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Mate has HIDs and i ride with LEDs. To be honest sitting at the top of spooky woods is no longer fun at night as he comes along and lights everything up and blinds me. LEDs can be turned off to allow to to enjoy teh night.


 
Posted : 09/10/2009 9:12 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

My mate has a 4 year old HID, i have Ay-Ups, i think his HID is better, if he is riding behind me i am in shadow

Trouble is if i follow him i end up following his horrific line choices !!


 
Posted : 09/10/2009 9:16 am
 cp
Posts: 8970
Full Member
 

yep, 'in use' there wont be much difference, but LEDS will use a little less current, you can switch them on and off to your hearts content, are more reliable, prob wont go wrong so wont be expensive to replace bits like in HID...


 
Posted : 09/10/2009 9:16 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

What about battery life and the lifetime of the unit itself?Aren't these better on LED?


 
Posted : 09/10/2009 9:18 am
Posts: 1
Free Member
 

I've got a L&M Arc and a L&M Seca, the Seca is brighter, its got a better beam pattern, I don't have to wait for it to warm up and the LED's are a lot more robust than the HID.


 
Posted : 09/10/2009 9:19 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

But a 3 year old HID may well not have a great life left - they're a bit hit and miss after a couple of years judging by all my mates' ones.

Anyway, LEDs have definitely reached the point of being better than HIDs when everything's considered (output, durability, life, switch on/off ability (with thanks to BritGas..)) nowadays I reckon.

Also, my experience is that the LEDs we've compared to HIDs are of similar if not better brightness than HIDs though obviously different models of HIDs and LEDs may vary in this respect


 
Posted : 09/10/2009 9:20 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

PP fair point on a lux test the LEDS of a P7 tourch against the HID the leds are almost twice the output

But real world usage I can see there is not realy alot in it. Bright does not necessary mean usable!!!

What I do like is the "bastid" and battery pack are realy small compared to my old Lumi HID oh and it only cost £52

guess it is time for a ride to compare both


 
Posted : 09/10/2009 9:21 am
Posts: 14774
Free Member
 

if he is riding behind me i am in shadow

That's always going to happen, unless you have a stadium floodlight, because the area where both beams hit the floor is getting twice the power, whereas the area where your body covers is only getting yours.

I'm still not convinced on LED lights myself, though I've not used HIDs, I still prefer my old halogens.

I'm wondering about using yellow LEDs though, as these bleach your night vision less meaning you'll see more around and better with your lights off, rather than a brightly illuminated spot and then darkness.


 
Posted : 09/10/2009 9:22 am
Posts: 19914
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I've got a L&M Arc and a L&M Seca

See, that's a decent comparison, but how much is a Seca? 🙂

What about battery life and the lifetime of the unit itself?Aren't these better on LED?

Point = missed. Read the OP, I've already covered that. 🙂


 
Posted : 09/10/2009 9:22 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I can't be arsed carrying the 2kg house brick around to power the HID.

Everything in life is a compromise.


 
Posted : 09/10/2009 9:23 am
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

you must have cr@p LEDs or great HIDS.
My older version troutie is brighter than any HID i have ever seen. Battery life is about 3 times the length and you could run the light over with a car whilst switching it on and off and it would still work.
Anyone ever seen a HID recommended on a what light thread in the last year ? Can you still buy them new?


 
Posted : 09/10/2009 9:24 am
Posts: 19914
Free Member
Topic starter
 

you must have cr@p LEDs or great HIDS.

Great HIDs I think. 🙂 You should try an L&M!
It's certainly better than twin Lumi LEDS and Ay-ups (I know a couple of people with Ay-Ups. TBH I think the beam is feeble)
Has to be said that if I was buying a new light now, I think I'd try a Trout light, mind 🙂


 
Posted : 09/10/2009 9:33 am
Posts: 6985
Free Member
 

when someone wires up the switch on the led's properly i will be interested.

you should be able to switch from medium power straight to full power without having to go via flashing and off.

My Niterider Storm is brighter than my Minewt Dual X2 which is brighter than the DX.


 
Posted : 09/10/2009 9:38 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Now i haven't used a bike hid but my car has them and i can turn those on and off as much as i like plus they are still on the original lamps and they are 5 years old. so i sopose my question on them is are they (bike ones) built less reliable?


 
Posted : 09/10/2009 9:41 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

when someone wires up the switch on the led's properly i will be interested.

LOL - that's a pretty weak argument 🙂

FWIW, my LEDs switch between high and low without going through flashing (you have to do something different for that).


 
Posted : 09/10/2009 9:43 am
Posts: 1
Free Member
 

but how much is a Seca?

As far as I can remember I paid a similar amount for the Seca to that I paid for the Arc (that said, the Seca jumped up in price after I bought it due to the weakness of the £).


 
Posted : 09/10/2009 9:45 am
 devs
Posts: 1
Free Member
 

Was just about to say. We do club rides twice a week at night and there used to be a dominance of HIDs. Once the Hope4s and Ay Ups started appearing the HIDs were starting to be outclassed in both performance and practicality and faff factor. I don't think anyone uses them anymore. The last time I saw one it died mid ride and couldn't be resurrected even after multiple battery changes. So, in answer to the original question - YES!


 
Posted : 09/10/2009 9:46 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I prefer the colour of HID over LED, that said they are both great in their own way. I run both my old Lumi HID on the bars and a new Lumi LED on my helmet, great combo i reckon. Both use Li-Ion batteries too so not much weight and both are around 4 hour burn time. Not had any problems at all with the HID either, except a bulb replacement after i dropped the lamp from a fair height onto concrete.

SOOBalias, the Lumi`s are wired up properly with a little rocker switch, one way up, the other way down in power.


 
Posted : 09/10/2009 9:47 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

with PP on this - yet to see an LED setup which compares to my L&M ARC. I have a couple of powerful LED lights which I use as backup, but wouldn't be without my ARC.


 
Posted : 09/10/2009 9:50 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

HID ~ 50 lm/W
Latest LED ~140 lm/W

Therefore, much smaller/longer lasting/cheaper batteries.

Add to that much better robustness (no £70 bulb replacements) and it's a no-brainer as far as I'm concerned.


 
Posted : 09/10/2009 9:50 am
Posts: 106
Free Member
 

My Trailtech HID was flaky and unreliable and cut out with no warning when it decided the battery level was too low.

My Tiger LEDs (similiar amount of light) are now starting their third winter, far more user friendly, dimmable, "fuel gauge" battery indicator lights on the back and 100% reliable so far.

more robust and can be dimmed easier

Anyway, what have the Romans ever done for us, eh? 😉


 
Posted : 09/10/2009 9:54 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I've just ordered some of those DX lights for my first night ride. For me the cheapness of the LED's gets my vote, plus less faff n'all. In use, I'd say just enough light to stop you crashing is ok, makes it more exciting!!!! I'll get my coat....


 
Posted : 09/10/2009 9:55 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I used to run Cateye Stadium 3 hids - in its day the most powerful light available but bulky and heavy.
For the past 2 years I've used Exposure LEDs - light and compact.
Both systems have been great, but at the moment LEDs are in favour so more development and advances are being made in this type of light.


 
Posted : 09/10/2009 10:02 am
Posts: 19914
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I've just ordered some of those DX lights for my first night ride.

You're gonna LOVE it!
I'd like to see the DX light too..... 🙂


 
Posted : 09/10/2009 10:07 am
 Del
Posts: 8278
Full Member
 

well, if you're buying new now, there's no reason to buy HID. if you've got HID, there's no reason to bin them yet, and probably won't be for a couple of years. they're still great lights.

lux test the LEDS of a P7 tourch against the HID the leds are almost twice the output

SD keeps rolling this one out but will never state how old his HID bulb is, which rather makes the test useless unfortunately. if you look at the welch-allyn data sheets there is a clear correlation between hours of service and light output.
this years LEDS might just pip the HIDs on output/w, but lensing has to be done right too. aside from that the well documented robustness of LEDs is a winner ( though the driving electronics has to be robust too ) and the assumption is that you will never have to repair them ( rightly or wrongly ), whereas HID inevitabley will require a new bulb, and maybe a ballast too, after some years use.


 
Posted : 09/10/2009 10:32 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

this years LEDS might just pip the HIDs on output/w

Sorry, but see my post above - LEDs are miles ahead.

To be fair, no commercial lights have those LEDs yet (Cree XPGs), but that's all the more reason to make your own!


 
Posted : 09/10/2009 10:34 am
Posts: 45
Free Member
 

So would anyone pay to replace their HID bulb when needed or would they be better off just getting a new LED system?

I have the 1st generation Cateye tripleshot and just got a LUU light - not sure what to do with the tripleshot now.


 
Posted : 09/10/2009 10:44 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I've just ordered some of those DX lights for my first night ride.

Maybe next winter then. I ordered mine on the 14th September and they still haven't showed up. 👿


 
Posted : 09/10/2009 10:47 am
Posts: 16208
Free Member
 

I prefer the colour temperature of halogen to HID or LED, I think it picks out more detail on the trail. And if it's a question of lumens, my 40W Lumicycle seems to be as bright as anything else in our club. The downside is of course a heavy battery and short run-time.


 
Posted : 09/10/2009 10:48 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I've got the Niterider Enduro HID.. I bought it last year as it was pretty much half price, I've had real problems with it, Mayhem and 24/12 night laps were horrid as it generally died mid lap.

I got so fed up with it that I've bought some Hope 4's.. now I use them both (strangely, my HID light is working perfectly all of a sudden) and I'm loving night rides.. the HID light is great mounted on my lid but I wouldn't want to rely solely on it again..


 
Posted : 09/10/2009 10:52 am
Posts: 14774
Free Member
 

OK my initial research was wrong, you actually want to be using RED leds up front as this does not bleach your night vision (rods) and still allows resolution of fine detail. Not good for road riding of course, but still I might knock up a red CREE option.


 
Posted : 09/10/2009 10:52 am
 devs
Posts: 1
Free Member
 

yet to see an LED setup which compares to my L&M ARC

These are the HIDs to which I referred. All replaced by either AyUps or DX lights now.


 
Posted : 09/10/2009 10:58 am
Posts: 14707
Free Member
 

[i]mudshark - Member
So would anyone pay to replace their HID bulb when needed or would they be better off just getting a new LED system?[/i]

Nope now replaced my completely dead lupine (element is broken) with a magicshine and am very happy with it.
£90+ for a HID replacement lamp vs £50 for a complete LED system, do the math.

As per DeVs, all of my m8's are replacing there HID with LED's as the HID die.

Totally lost as to why the OP believe a 2nd hand L&M off ebay for £100 is better than a £50 LED whith the same output level & a warrenty (which is honoured)


 
Posted : 09/10/2009 11:31 am
Posts: 19914
Free Member
Topic starter
 

What is it with Ay-Ups? Why so popular? They really are pretty feeble compared to most other lights I've seen..... 😕


 
Posted : 09/10/2009 11:32 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I've got a lumi led, and have ridden with guys with different Hid's and must say out of all of the Hid's the only one which i thought was better than the lumi led was the L&M Arc!


 
Posted : 09/10/2009 11:38 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

"lux test the LEDS of a P7 tourch against the HID the leds are almost twice the output"

SD keeps rolling this one out but will never state how old his HID bulb is, which rather makes the test useless unfortunately. if you look at the welch-allyn data sheets there is a clear correlation between hours of service and light output.

Sorry for trying to be constructive but perhaps if the question was asked how old the HID I would of said about 4 years old and aproximatly 50 ish hrs use. I would say that the lux test is a honest test as opposed to reading data sheets ( which [u][b]anyone[/b][/u] can do but it does not allow for manifacturing tolerances) because I did it back to back in the real world ok my garden, not a lab

But of course it is of no indication to how usable the light spread of colour rendition is, thats where using them comes in, hence that is why folk still like there old Lumi halogens


 
Posted : 09/10/2009 11:39 am
Posts: 17846
Full Member
 

I've still got Lumi halogens and definitely prefer the yellowy light compared to the bright white of LEDs. You don't even notice how yellow they are until you ride with someone using LEDs.

Mate of mine i did the D2D borrowed the Lumi 4LED spot for one lap & used it with his halogen 12w spot for comparison. He said he much preferred the halogen as it was just as bright, but lit up more 'around' the focus point of the beam. He said the LED was very on/off at the edge of the beam.
He also tried the flood, but I'm not sure what he made of that - forgot to ask him.

I am interested in converting my Lumi halogen at some point to LED just to see what it performs like, but I am sure when I first looked the Cutter kit was about £45, now it's nearer £70.


 
Posted : 09/10/2009 11:41 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[i]£90+ for a HID replacement lamp vs £50 for a complete LED system, do the math[/i][b]s[/b]


 
Posted : 09/10/2009 11:42 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[i] yet to see an LED setup which compares to my L&M ARC

These are the HIDs to which I referred. All replaced by either AyUps or DX lights now. [/i]

Comparing my ARC to my AyUps, or my friend's DX, I'll be sticking with the ARC and keeping the AyUps as the bar-mounted backup thanks.


 
Posted : 09/10/2009 11:45 am
Posts: 14707
Free Member
 

as an aside, just for andyp
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Math_(disambiguation)


 
Posted : 09/10/2009 11:50 am
Posts: 11468
Full Member
 

I was riding last night with two Cutter quad spots in new Trout housings, which are ace btw, I'll post some pics when I have a spare minute. I used to - and still have - a Lumi HID, which is bright with good spread but heavy and as has already been pointed out, expensive to fix if it breaks.

I'd say the quad running at full whack is pretty much as bright as or brighter than the HID though maybe with not quite such a wide spread - two of them sorts that out though - but it's lighter and a lot more controllable. Because you can set different power levels, you can conserve battery life by running a lower level on fire roads and tarmac for example, then whacking the levels right up for technical stuff - railing Peak tec last night at daytime speeds...

I used to run Lumi halogens and they were perfectly adequate but as your mates upgrade, it turns into a bit of an arms race to avoid riding into a Mordor-like shadow.

But anyway, there's nowt wrong with HID output, but there are other factors to consider as well I think. Not the least of which is that you can stop, switch your LEDs off and soak up the ambience. With HIDs, you need to leave them on...


 
Posted : 09/10/2009 11:51 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

as an aside, just for z1ppy
[url] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematics [/url]
and
[url] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Retarded_american_spelling [/url]


 
Posted : 09/10/2009 11:54 am
Posts: 19914
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I've got a lumi led, and have ridden with guys with different Hid's and must say out of all of the Hid's the only one which i thought was better than the lumi led was the L&M Arc!

Comparing my ARC to my AyUps, or my friend's DX, I'll be sticking with the ARC and keeping the AyUps as the bar-mounted backup thanks.

Ahh. So it's not just me then? ARCs _ARE_ pretty damn good!
🙂

Although my Lumi HID fries the ARC on sheer power, but it's not got such a wide, even beam, which is why I prefer the ARC


 
Posted : 09/10/2009 11:58 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Great HIDs I think. You should try an L&M!
It's certainly better than twin Lumi LEDS and Ay-ups

Relatively poor LEDs as well - many/most of us are riding with triple or quad LEDs, which probably would match or beat the raaw output. You also ask "are they any better" yet acknowledge and dismiss the reasons they are better - is an HID no better than a car halogen headlamp with a car bettery to run it? Is it irrelevant that the £100 cost of a light from ebay doesn't include the cost of a replacement bulb for when that goes (which with HID it most likely will eventually)?


 
Posted : 09/10/2009 12:13 pm
Page 1 / 2