Forum menu
Is it worth getting...
 

[Closed] Is it worth getting UST tyres...

Posts: 13643
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#1430941]

...when you can just bung in some latex and save a whole bunch of weight? Same goes for UST rims I guess (speaking as a man who just shelled out on a pair of Mavic 819s. Oops....)


 
Posted : 20/03/2010 8:16 pm
Posts: 21647
Full Member
 

yes, I think UST tyres are worth it. Primarily for the reinforced sidewalls but I guess it can depend on what you ride, where you ride and how you ride it.


 
Posted : 20/03/2010 8:39 pm
Posts: 35074
Full Member
 

They're an awful lot less hassle than any DIY rim sealed system.


 
Posted : 20/03/2010 8:45 pm
Posts: 4686
Full Member
 

As a heavier (15st+) rider, yes.


 
Posted : 20/03/2010 8:46 pm
Posts: 13643
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Well sweet jesus, ah may just go and get me some then! ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 20/03/2010 9:57 pm
Posts: 66115
Full Member
 

I think it depends where you ride, I've never had the slightest problem with my regular Nevegals, and they're not even particularily tough tyres but some geography's harder on tyres and sidewalls, maybe if I lived somewhere slatey I'd want proper UST. Certainly no benefit for me though as it stands, so far as I can see.


 
Posted : 20/03/2010 10:07 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The SWS version of the Nevegal could be the best of both if sidewall cuts are an issue....


 
Posted : 20/03/2010 10:12 pm
 DezB
Posts: 54367
Free Member
 

I just couldn't be bothered with the hassle of trying to seal non-UST tyres. USTs are simple.


 
Posted : 20/03/2010 10:22 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Hassle? 1st time everytime here and I've tried: Vapours, High Rollers, Mountain Kings, Spesh LK, Mud X and Nevegals. In fact been tubeless for 2-3 years and never used UST.


 
Posted : 20/03/2010 10:25 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

If you ride in a rocky area don't think you can beat it.


 
Posted : 20/03/2010 10:35 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Add to the above the ease of fitting compared to some non-UST tyres.


 
Posted : 21/03/2010 12:04 pm
Posts: 13643
Free Member
Topic starter
 

As for hassle, once you get the hang of it(!), running regular tyres as tubeless really is so ridiculously easy. So are UST one's really that much stronger? What is is it exactly that they do to make it "UST"? Considering on some models you could be saving as much as 200g per tyre, I think this is a really big deal!!


 
Posted : 21/03/2010 2:18 pm
Posts: 357
Free Member
 

[i]What is is it exactly that they do to make it "UST"? Considering on some models you could be saving as much as 200g per tyre, I think this is a really big deal!! [/i]

They have a different bead which hooks up to and makes a seal without the need for a sealant to UST rims which is why I have found that some normal tires will not go tubeless on UST rims as they don't make an air tight seal because of the difference in bead (Schwalbe being a prime example)


 
Posted : 21/03/2010 3:38 pm
Posts: 4686
Full Member
 

So are UST one's really that much stronger?

In addition to the bead that Rotor Stern has mentioned, UST tyres are inherently airtight - you can actually run them without sealant but you'd lose all protection against things like thorns, nails, glass, etc. This is why they tend to be heavier, as the tyre itself is more robust.


 
Posted : 21/03/2010 5:51 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

+1 for real UST.


 
Posted : 21/03/2010 6:32 pm
Posts: 1154
Free Member
 

UST tyres don't need sealant to be puncture proof(but it helps), thorns will plug up their own holes nicely.


 
Posted : 21/03/2010 10:27 pm
Posts: 22
Free Member
 

Half way house like bontrager tlr or the specialised 2bliss seem like agood bet to me


 
Posted : 21/03/2010 10:41 pm
 DezB
Posts: 54367
Free Member
 

[i]once you get the hang of it[/i]

There's no "hang" to get with UST


 
Posted : 22/03/2010 9:51 am