Is 2.4 a bit much t...
 

[Closed] Is 2.4 a bit much to ask of a 26" arch ex

Posts: 14
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Thinking chunky monkey.
Cheers all


 
Posted : 07/02/2014 11:33 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I run a cm on a crest with no issues at all.


 
Posted : 07/02/2014 11:45 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

O-O recommends a minimum of 19mm so you should be fine.


 
Posted : 07/02/2014 11:47 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Dunno how big a chunky monkey comes up, but a 2.4" Schwalbe seems alright for me. Going by the size of a 2.25" maxxis/on-one and how much bigger they come up than a 2.25" Schwalbe, I'd guess a 2.4" maxxis/on-one would come up a bit bigger again
Oh and if they're still there and you come across them, don't buy the 2.4" Schwalbe Fat Albert TLready's on on-one. I fell for them and they're the older 2012 ones that don't fit onto stans rims.
Newer 2013 onward (what crc has) fit fine

Remember stans claim the 21mm internal archEX has an 'effective' internal width of more like 25mm because of the BST2 way the rim holds the bead, ie it doesn't hold very much of it so its not pinching it in anything like the same way say a mavic does


 
Posted : 07/02/2014 11:47 pm
 nuke
Posts: 5794
Full Member
 

Is 2.4 a bit much to ask of a 26" arch ex

No, not at all...good combination IMO. I've run a 2.5 minion a Crest and that was fine and the Crest has the same internal width as the arch ex


 
Posted : 07/02/2014 11:48 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I run a Chunky Monkey on an Arch Ex, I am still alive ๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 07/02/2014 11:55 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

a 2.5" minion is I reckon ever so slightly smaller than a 2.25"* maxxis/on-one

*new** tread maxxis (advantage, crossmark, ardent, others)
**apart from newest high roller 2, minion dhr2* which have gone smaller, but not as small as old tread maxxis?
high roller, minion dhf/dhr, others
*haven't actually seen one of these, but am assuming will be the same as the HR2, given released at the same time and the lineage with the original smaller older tread versions


 
Posted : 07/02/2014 11:57 pm
Posts: 3629
Full Member
 

I run a 2.35 hans dampf on Arch Ex's with no problems. I know you said 2.4 but the dampf is a big tyre ๐Ÿ˜€


 
Posted : 07/02/2014 11:58 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Re: the comparison between the CM and Schwalbe, The 2.4 CM is slightly smaller than a 2.4 Nobby, I've run both on the same wheel & fork and the CM had slightly more clearance. Note: the NN fell to bits within 6 months but the CM is over a year old and still looks new ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 08/02/2014 12:00 am
 nuke
Posts: 5794
Full Member
 

a 2.5" minion is I reckon ever so slightly smaller than a 2.25"* maxxis/on-one

I've a 2.5 minion, chunky monkey, smorgasbord plus various other maxxis tyres...a 2.5 minion is probably on a par with a 2.4 chunky monkey and definitely bigger than a 2.25 smorgasbord


 
Posted : 08/02/2014 12:06 am
Posts: 14
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Superb and thanks gang.
Been searching for recommended sizes for the arch and got nowhere.
Already have a couple of smorgasboard so should be a nice combo with one outback. ๐Ÿ˜€


 
Posted : 08/02/2014 12:24 am
Posts: 2155
Full Member
 

Its a good combination. If you've already got the smorgasbord mounted I found the cm about 3mm wider across the knobs and about 1mm across the carcass. I was bored....


 
Posted : 08/02/2014 12:55 am
Posts: 3225
Free Member
 

Oh and if they're still there and you come across them, don't buy the 2.4" Schwalbe Fat Albert TLready's on on-one. I fell for them and they're the older 2012 ones that don't fit onto stans rims.
Newer 2013 onward (what crc has) fit fine

Sorry, OT, but I bought FAs from OnOne about 18mths-2 years ago. So I would think its the 2012 version. Been fitted to my ArchEX since I got the rim (12mths ago). Not had any issues on Flows either.


 
Posted : 08/02/2014 7:03 am