Forum menu
integrated headsets...
 

[Closed] integrated headsets aside from the theoretical issues any reported problems?

Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#2695760]

You know those headsets where they have no cups, the bearing sits straight on the frame, well I don't like the sound of them and a few mates have had issues. Does anyone have any experience or know of any reported problems?


 
Posted : 27/04/2011 8:50 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

bump for the coffee crew


 
Posted : 27/04/2011 10:44 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

None over 3 years use on my frames. Just have to grease the things, no visible wear to the 'cups' in the frame and no uneven wear on the outside of the bearings to indicate any movement.


 
Posted : 27/04/2011 10:50 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

so you have cartridge bearings seated directly on the frame? Is this an mtb? I am looking at a DH frame with a tapered head tube, only the top is this integrated standard..


 
Posted : 27/04/2011 11:18 am
Posts: 4
Free Member
 

In the bike industry you struggle to get anything to remain "standard".


 
Posted : 27/04/2011 11:43 am
Posts: 4
Free Member
 

Some work...some don't.

Spesh ones on the likes of their Tricoss and related commuter bikes are pretty piss poor in my experience.


 
Posted : 27/04/2011 11:45 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

its a cartridge bearing is it not - so the actual bearing is not running on the frame just the outer race seated on the frame instead of in a cup and then the cup seated in the frame


 
Posted : 27/04/2011 11:47 am
Posts: 6947
Full Member
 

CDale use these on the lefty steerer and they're absolutely fine, used them for years - not tapered but the integrated headset, just a simple cup-like thing and a cartridge bearing.


 
Posted : 27/04/2011 11:54 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

TJ yeah its true but have you seen the faces of your cups when replacing bearings?? I dunno I guess its nice to know if you wreck the cup you can replace the headset. I would hate to ruin a frame just because of it, I'm just trying to find out if it has ever happened...


 
Posted : 27/04/2011 12:00 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I've had a meta 5 with int h/s for a couple of years now.
The stock one proved poorly sealed and prone to ingress of muck/water.
Felt rough within first year of use.
Replaced when new forks fitted.
Relacement (sorry can't remember what but think its a CC) appears better sealed and hasn't required any attention yet.

TJ is correct. OMG - did someone actually say that ๐Ÿ˜†
I've experienced no issues resulting from being sat directly on frame rather than cups.
HTH


 
Posted : 27/04/2011 12:07 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yep - cartridges straight into frame, on an MTB. I think I've also got one on my road bike, but haven't bothered to look at it TBH....


 
Posted : 27/04/2011 12:08 pm
Posts: 3384
Free Member
 

My 6 year old merida AM frame is fine with them.


 
Posted : 27/04/2011 12:19 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Thanks for the replies. Hmmm decisions..


 
Posted : 27/04/2011 1:36 pm
 pdw
Posts: 2206
Free Member
 

its a cartridge bearing is it not - so the actual bearing is not running on the frame just the outer race seated on the frame instead of in a cup and then the cup seated in the frame

Yep, but the cup would normally be an interference fit on the frame, whereas the bearing is just seated. Chris King [url= http://chrisking.com/files/pdfs/Int20HeadsetsExplained.pdf ]argues[/url] that this allows a small amount of movement between bearing and frame, which will wear the frame (particularly if it's aluminium). If this happens, there's not a lot you can do to repair the frame.

I'd be interested to know if anyone has experienced this in practice.


 
Posted : 27/04/2011 2:08 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I'd be interested to know if anyone has experienced this in practice.

That is exactly my point, as far as I can tell the "problem" is theoretical. Because I've spent last night and all of today searching for evidence of actual problems experienced and the net is bare..


 
Posted : 27/04/2011 2:12 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

So despite there being a feeling that integrated headsets might cause frame damage, and some theoretical issues, I have searched for actual experiences of frame failures and this is the result.

1 ) From forum posts
stw :3 positives actual experience (some negs but only opinion of the design/concept rather than experience)
sdh: 1 positive actual experience (some negs but only opinionof the design/concept rather than experience)

2) Emails sent to forum users (mostly on sdh) who have stated they own bikes that I know to have integrated headsets

7 replies , 7 positives.

I cannot find a single report of frame failure...

Please someone prove me wrong?


 
Posted : 28/04/2011 9:56 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Maverick have used this approack for years and I am not aware of a single frame wear issue.

My last Maverick was 4 years old and still on its original FSA headset and my current one is 2 years old - both 100% issue free.


 
Posted : 28/04/2011 10:08 am
 aP
Posts: 681
Free Member
 

The only problem I've had with an IS headset is that there was insufficient height between the top of the head tube and the bottom of the headset top cover on my current cx race bike, which has taken [i]some time[/i] to identify and sort out. However, now I've got a pack of micro spacers, hopefully it'll be sorted in time for the Bucks Off-road in 2 weeks time. The other bike I've got with an IS headset has been absolutely fine for the last 3-4 years.


 
Posted : 28/04/2011 10:10 am