Inbred a good choic...
 

[Closed] Inbred a good choice for......

Posts: 14273
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Winter trail riding (a wet and muddy Delamere mostly but trips to the Clywds as well)? If so would a 456 be OK with a 100mm fork or does it need longer?
Looking to build a bit of a mud plugger.


 
Posted : 20/06/2009 3:43 pm
Posts: 34938
Full Member
 

be perfect


 
Posted : 20/06/2009 3:44 pm
Posts: 1879
Free Member
 

100mm fork would be ok but a 120mm fork would be better if funds permit.


 
Posted : 20/06/2009 4:00 pm
Posts: 4315
Free Member
 

Inbred 29er ss even better for mud plugging ๐Ÿ˜€


 
Posted : 20/06/2009 4:04 pm
Posts: 414
Free Member
 

If you're going to use a 100mm fork and you're not a fat biffer, you'd be better off with a standard Inbred rather than a 456.


 
Posted : 20/06/2009 4:09 pm
Posts: 14273
Free Member
Topic starter
 

If you're going to use a 100mm fork and you're not a fat biffer, you'd be better off with a standard Inbred rather than a 456. If you're going to use a 100mm fork and you're not a fat biffer, you'd be better off with a standard Inbred rather than a 456.

Fork not bought or decided upon yet so could get a 120 - or I could take the Talas off my Stumpy for the winter. Funds are def an issue though ๐Ÿ™

I'm guessing that 89kg makes me a bit of a biffa?


 
Posted : 20/06/2009 4:13 pm
Posts: 4315
Free Member
 

I was only half joking ๐Ÿ˜‰ its worth trying out the Inbred 29er with carbon forks. Cheap and perfect in winter (or in my case all year). When I had a 456 I preferred it with forks at 115-120mm.


 
Posted : 20/06/2009 4:31 pm
Posts: 1879
Free Member
 

This might help answer your question.

http://getsatisfaction.com/onone/topics/456_inbred_rigid

FWIW I prefer my inbred with the fork set at 120mm.


 
Posted : 20/06/2009 4:43 pm
Posts: 14273
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Thanks guys. Will try and source some 120mm forks.


 
Posted : 22/06/2009 11:59 am