Forum menu
How much seatpost d...
 

[Closed] How much seatpost do you have showing?

Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#1341254]

After a post yesterday i was concerned i had too much for the fashion police on show!!

Just measured and from clamp to rails is 25cm - hardly a lot imo!! If that is not meant to be - why do people make 400mm+ seatposts eg thomson?

There is a good 120mm in the frame if not more


 
Posted : 19/02/2010 12:29 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Say what?


 
Posted : 19/02/2010 12:30 pm
Posts: 251
Full Member
 

don't worry - I have about the same on all my frames - as long as the reach is right for you then a smaller mainframe isn't really a problem.

And a Ti post in my medium inbred gives a good bit of comfort 'twang' too.


 
Posted : 19/02/2010 12:31 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

si - some tosser who has never seen me reckons i have aframe too small as i have a lot of seatpost on show!!


 
Posted : 19/02/2010 12:32 pm
Posts: 251
Full Member
 

r_r - I think it was mostly people doing the 'taking the mick out of new bike picture' thing tbh (certainly was with my comments).


 
Posted : 19/02/2010 12:34 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Nothing wrong with lots of seatpost showing in my opinion

[img] [/img]

^ now with inline post though.


 
Posted : 19/02/2010 12:41 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

People were just taking the mick Rob. You do it when people post pics of bikes ๐Ÿ˜‰

If the bike is comfortable for you then that's all that counts.


 
Posted : 19/02/2010 12:45 pm
Posts: 2061
Full Member
 

about this much:

[url= http://www.flickr.com/photos/7779205@N07/3192165412/ ] [img] [/img] [/url]


 
Posted : 19/02/2010 12:56 pm
Posts: 14774
Free Member
 

I have loads of post showing, I like a small frame to throw around, despite being 6'1. I'm sure people were just having a chuckle.


 
Posted : 19/02/2010 12:58 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

There is nothing wrong with it, it just means you bought the wrong sized frame - like the two guys above!


 
Posted : 19/02/2010 12:58 pm
Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

Jeez Rob do you think about anything other than bicycles?


 
Posted : 19/02/2010 12:59 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Horses for courses. My Turner looks like a kids bike, but as Coffeeking says having a small frame to throw around is brilliant assuming it's been designed that way and has the right reach and the front end isn't too low.


 
Posted : 19/02/2010 1:21 pm
Posts: 9299
Free Member
 

About 24-25cm I think. Small frame but it feels great.


 
Posted : 19/02/2010 1:25 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

jimmer himself - Member
Horses for courses. My Turner looks like a kids bike, but as Coffeeking says having a small frame to throw around is brilliant [b]assuming it's been designed that way [/b]and has the right reach and the front end isn't too low.

And there's the rub.... Lots of folk seem to be riding around on frames which the manufacturer would say were too small for them according to any published height/sizing charts. Of course, I'm sure the designers know less about these things than the elite STW hive mind.


 
Posted : 19/02/2010 1:27 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I have a 410mm post because a 350mm is too short.

More standover means a longer post. Plus, i'd rather have a 410mm post than a 350mm at max extension because when I did that I experienced a lot more flexing.


 
Posted : 19/02/2010 1:27 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I blame it on the desire of the average MTBer to buy hardcore MTB equipment when all they really do is mince about on terrain that the average XC racer could demolish on a 80mm travel hardtail.

Like me.

EDIT: I meant that i'm the average MTBer, not the XC racer!


 
Posted : 19/02/2010 1:30 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The old small frame thing for throwing around seems less in favour with the bike mags, in a recent article I read they were extolling the virtues of a slightly more roomy cockpit (sorry I hate that term) allowing for more comfort and better climbing.

RR I think with the snowy background the fact that the dropper post is slim (for half of it at least) and the raised seatube design of your Giant just makes it look longer than it really is..


 
Posted : 19/02/2010 1:33 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

what about the days of 23inch frames and 10cm of seat tube poking out. Much better!


 
Posted : 19/02/2010 1:38 pm
Posts: 3722
Free Member
 

I have lots showing when I'm sat climbing up a fire road. I have long legs for my height, so a larger frame would be too long. The person that took the p!ss must be perfectly proportioned.


 
Posted : 19/02/2010 1:44 pm
Posts: 3539
Full Member
 

I always get told I have too much post showing (matron) but any less and I get knee problems due to not extending my legs enough.
[img] [/img]

The frame's a 19.5" and I'm 5'11", so I'd not want anything bigger.

EDIT: Hideously mismatching chain-ring was bought for my previous frame (blue) and is soon to be replaced ๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 19/02/2010 1:46 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

RR didnt you have that great looking Prophet?


 
Posted : 19/02/2010 1:53 pm
Posts: 251
Full Member
 

[i]great looking Prophet[/i]

he's ditched it for a Giant that doesn't quite fit ๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 19/02/2010 1:54 pm
 Keva
Posts: 3280
Free Member
 

my saddle is pretty much level with the bars.


 
Posted : 19/02/2010 2:03 pm
Posts: 9299
Free Member
 

Since we're posting pics, here's my do-it-all hardtail in sitdown mode

[IMG] [/IMG]

If I had anything bigger it'd be useless for jumping and downhill. I prefer a shorter reach/cockpit anyway, my old Rockhopper was far too long and felt stretched. Planning on getting a thomson post soon though as I don't know if an alu post with all my weight on it is a good idea. It is a beefy post though, NC17 with apparently reinforced tubing. So maybe I'll be ok.


 
Posted : 19/02/2010 2:09 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

#
cynic-al - Member

Jeez Rob do you think about anything other than bicycles?
Posted 2 hours ago # Report-Post

rich coming from the bloke that posts one every one of my threads!!


 
Posted : 19/02/2010 3:21 pm
Posts: 14774
Free Member
 

And there's the rub.... Lots of folk seem to be riding around on frames which the manufacturer would say were too small for them according to any published height/sizing charts. Of course, I'm sure the designers know less about these things than the elite STW hive mind.

TBH I have no idea what size Giant made my NRS for, I've never checked the charts, all I know is that I bought a medium based on approx geometry of my previous bike and it feels nice set up as I have it ๐Ÿ™‚ I've no real interest in how Giant saw it sized. But what do i know ๐Ÿ˜€


 
Posted : 19/02/2010 3:29 pm
Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

Of course, I'm sure the designers know less about these things than the elite STW hive mind.

I'd say fit is subjective. Bez' bike looks v odd to me for instance, but it works for him, and I doubt it was designed to be used that way...


 
Posted : 19/02/2010 3:31 pm
Posts: 251
Full Member
 

"Bez' bike looks v odd to me"

I think, on that one, you're in the majority!


 
Posted : 19/02/2010 3:32 pm
Posts: 175
Free Member
 

Interesting.I

a

t appear to be too extreme.

I think the problem for me was that there was a big jump between sizes with Giant.

19" frames in Specialized and an Orange P7 I tried do seem to fit a little better.

I had been considering getting an 18" Scandal,which would give a little more reach but would show even more seatpost...........


 
Posted : 19/02/2010 4:03 pm
Posts: 9299
Free Member
 

^I'm shamelessly plugging this everywhere I can, I have a 19" Rockhopper that I really need to sell, sounds like it'll fit you well if you like 19" spesh ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 19/02/2010 4:22 pm
Posts: 175
Free Member
 

Nice try Tom..... ๐Ÿ˜†


 
Posted : 19/02/2010 4:30 pm
Posts: 36
Free Member
 

Interesting thread,I recently bought a 19" P7 (2010), I'm 5 11 tall with a 33 " inside leg.

I felt it was too big a frame with not enough stand over - didn't measure how much post was sticking out - but it looked enough. Just didn't feel right on it (lack of stand over , more than anything else). The P7 doesn't have much in way of a dropped top tube.

Since bought a new medium Cotic Soul - 250mm of seat post to the saddle rails, but feels much better (and definitely more stand over).

As others have said it depends on the frame and how individuals like the ride - probably the best in terms of fit that I've had was a large Turner Flux.


 
Posted : 19/02/2010 4:36 pm
Posts: 13291
Free Member
 

post goes up..... forks go down, bar goes forward.

[img] [/img]

post goes down..... forks go up, bar come back.

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 19/02/2010 4:46 pm
Posts: 467
Free Member
 

With a lot of seatpost showing, you can end up with a lot of vert height diff between bars and saddle.


 
Posted : 19/02/2010 5:03 pm
Posts: 14774
Free Member
 

With a lot of seatpost showing, you can end up with a lot of vert height diff between bars and saddle.

Award for most obvious statement of the week over here please ๐Ÿ˜€ ๐Ÿ˜†


 
Posted : 19/02/2010 5:17 pm
 jedi
Posts: 10249
Full Member
 

i change mine about, usually 8 inches


 
Posted : 19/02/2010 5:19 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Is it like Victorians & ankles - show too much and people get giddy & offended?


 
Posted : 19/02/2010 5:30 pm
Posts: 14774
Free Member
 

As Jedi says, don't most people change it depending on what riding they're doing?


 
Posted : 19/02/2010 5:41 pm
 Tim
Posts: 1092
Free Member
 

If you dont have to get the longest post you can,...then your frames too big for you ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 19/02/2010 6:46 pm
 br
Posts: 18125
Free Member
 

[IMG] [/IMG]

20" frame, and long legs


 
Posted : 19/02/2010 7:58 pm
Posts: 24440
Full Member
 

who cares if it looks like a lot of post, if it fits and is comfy it's right and is the reason you test ride different sizes


 
Posted : 19/02/2010 8:10 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Here here Rocketdog.


 
Posted : 19/02/2010 10:06 pm
 mboy
Posts: 12651
Free Member
 

People have different length legs and torsos, this is the main thing to remember...

I have quite a long leg length for my height, so invariably when I ride a "correct" sized frame for my height, a 350mm seatpost is slightly too short. So I've become accustomed to just using 410mm Thomsons on everything as they're the one post I haven't managed to bend yet!

So to most people, my bikes look like they've got too much seatpost showing... But generally, they've also got relaively short stems on too. If someone is running a 410mm post AND a stem 20mm longer than ideal, they likely should be riding the next size bike up. But if like me you need the shorter bike, but with a long post cos of leg length, don't worry about what the nay sayers say... Have also seen plenty of bikes where you think about saying "put the seat up" to the rider as they've only got about 6" of post showing above the frame, but then you find out they've got ultra short legs and arms like an Orang-Utan!


 
Posted : 19/02/2010 10:16 pm