Forum menu
No problems here. For my Scottish forest riding they do really well in most conditions. They didn't perform any less well than Nates going up and down a very sloppy Inschriach yesterday! Swampies in the real gloop and snow, HRs for most of the year, SB8/RR/Aspen for the dry or when speed is required!
Once you're cornering hard the intermediate knobs will block the edge knobs' access to the ground even if those intermediate knobs line up with the gaps between the edge knobs (remember everything is moving and flexing).
If the ground is soft, surely the edge knobs will sink into the ground up to the tyre carcass regardless? As would the intermediate knobs, for that matter?
Not trying to be awkward or doubting your knowledge, just interested. 🙂
From memory like many widish tyres i felt that HR would sometimes float on top of the gloop rather than biting into it
When my HR were new the need to lean thing was quite a big deal, less so as the centre tread wore down.
When I first got them I thought they were designed so that in a straight line you were balanced only on the centre blocks for lower rolling resistance.
But this may not be true
For a non mud tyre I thought they were quite good at not clogging
Been a High Roller fan for years. I like Minion f's on the front these days with HR's on the back.
Used that combination for years now all over the UK and the Alps.
HR's should be printed with "aggressive riders only" on the side. I should know as they turned me into one after finding the sweet spot. That sweet spot is very though...
My front is a sticky 2.3 and its ace in every condition.
Braking in corners? Don't get it! You brake before the corner and then stuff your front wheel in!
loads of bragarts here talking pish amongst some nuggets of good sense! What can I expect online!
Agressive skillful riders have no prob with pish tyres, yeh yeh , whatever!
Thanks to everyone who passed of their experience without bigging up their trail finese! ; )
Bottom line. I dont dig HR's in wet mud and will try something else.
Happy riding folks
And here's me thinking i couldn't ride....now it all makes sense. I just need some new tyres.
Jason, tip the bike way over when you enter a corner then you'll understand. It isn't necessarily 'aggressive' or 'skilful', it's about leaning the bike. They tend to go together though. Lean the bike and they will bite!
hey chief, the principle is sound but you cant make make these badboys work on my trails. The kit ain't able for the job. No point trying to make do, better just to change rubber IMO!
Been riding the same trails for 10 years + and these HR's are an all time performance low.
Anyway, I wanted some good tyre recommendations and I got some!
Maxxis swampthing up front ( not the sticky ones unless you have legs bigger the Sir Christopher Hoy,tried them all)
bontrager mud x on the back= not falling off in the mud and on slippery roots and leaves are ok.Skills not required.Perfect for me who doesn't go into corners considering angles.
good call jonny!
Maxxis Swampthings look good but aren't they downhill tyres? After a more XC affair really!
Any of you skillful aggressive riders fancy some Maxxis high Rollers for a good price?
Jeez, just go and ride ffs. Rode the Rowberrow DHs today with new 60 compound HRs front and back, slipped around a bit, but what do you expect? It was fun, no one died.
i like high rollers, they do move around alot in the mud but then i figure most stuff does ?
+ for me is 10 months of use not a single flat 😀
If the ground is soft, surely the edge knobs will sink into the ground up to the tyre carcass regardless? As would the intermediate knobs, for that matter?
If the ground is soft then not only do the inside edges of the edge knobs have to grip against the ground, the ground they're gripping against has to stay attached to the rest of the ground. You know that stripey mark you get in the ground when your tyre suddenly slips outwards? That's the top layer which your tyre knobs are gripping against being sheared off sideways as it fails to resist your cornering force. An open channel between centre and edge knobs helps to give your tyre a wider and more stable chunk of ground to grip against.
I am assuming the op is talking about 2.1 60a xc high rollers, which can be a bit of a handful in mud. If he means 2.35s, or 2.5s then he really needs to get some coaching.
Whilst HRs are not ideal for mud they are workable in any conditions with a bit of skill.
Can't say that I've noticed any 'braggarts' on here just a few folks saying that actually HRs aint so bad as you say. Perhaps you dislike that advice because it implies you lack certain riding skills but that doesn't make it pish.
For what its worth on a very rooty muddy ride last week I was heard to remark 'you know for not a mud tyre High Rollers aint bad in mud'
I fully agree that HR's suit a more aggressive style.
I also agree that braking in corners is poor technique - it sits the bike up, ruins your line and decreases available grip, the latter trait exacerbated by certain tread patterns, of which HR's are a prime example.
Not sure that agressive ALWAYS equals better.
Obviously the design compromise inherent in certain tread patterns suits different styles of riding.
But as I said before, more skillful and experienced riders are usually more capable of adapting to different designs.
Apart form a very brief encounter with some tyre shaped michelin things, i've used only HRs since I started mtbing. No real reason for this but they came fitted to my first two bikes and I just replaced when needed them as I had no real issues. There is the odd occasion when they feel out of their depth (wet and slippery off-camber clay stuff mostly) but for a lazy git who doesn't want to be swapping tyres unless they're bald/ripped, they get my vote.
I think people get carried away with how much you need to lean over to find the grip - it's not that far over really - but if your not comfortable doing that, then there's no shame. I'm sure there's plenty of other tyres that offer a similar amount of grip (a lot of riding friends as using specialised tyres atm).
The braking into corners thing is a little scary. I didn't think anyone would be so daft. No wonder there;s a demand for coaching to ride a bike 😆
Just done the nofussevent at Kinlochleven with a High Roller on the back ,found it ok and it was a mudfest down the bottom of the trails
My bike came with hi-rollers, and I've yet to replace either so the rear's all but bald. And they're still great, no problems anywhere. And I ride with a serial tyre experimenter, and ride everything he does just as easily, including mendip mud.
It's not the tyres; but just to throw you a bone - maybe it's the pressures. 🙂
Clue's in the name with High Rollers 😉
Chief raises a good point about square tyres vs round ones. If you've come from something rounder it will feel horrible as you won't be used to clicking in with the gap. One riding style is not necessarily better in a broad sense, but square tyres are popular in the DH world.
I'm currently trying out some Geax Datura on my Blue Pig X which are higher volume 2.2 and very knobby. I didn't want a typical low volume mud tyre. They grip and clear very well due to the tall knobs, the profile is a bit square, but not as severe as a HR. A trade off for a tyre that clears well is that it can be a bit more prone to roots if you're not paying attention, but then again a clogged tyre won't grip anything!
Cheap a chips at On-One (£12.99 ea) [url= http://www.planet-x-bikes.co.uk/i/q/TYGXDTTT-26-BLK-22/geax_datura_mtb_ust_tubeless_tyre___26er___black___22inch ]HERE[/url] and they're UST if you're that way inclined.
[img] 
[/img]
They aren't light (890-900g) as they have more DH/FR oriented casings, but I think they still come in lighter than Swamp Things (1100g+ IIRC). I'm going tubeless to offset the weight a bit, they're pretty tight on the rim so I feel confident in them staying put.
They're not a mud tyre
I've not got much to compare tyres to but 2.35 High Rollers front and read here and they're great for the Peak District - then again we don't have much in the way of mud... Or corners 😀
I like High Rollers, but then I stay off the front brake in corners. The problem I find is that the side walls are a bit weak, which can lead to pinch flats when hammering the trail centres.
FYI "Rowberrow DHs" are renowned as the slipperiest trails in the known universe :-/ but I object to being called a "serial tyre experimenter " 😛
+1 for the tyre pressures. I run 25psi front and back on lust hr and although it took some getting used to, they are great
Which Highrollers !?
2.1's = skinny for their size, very low profile tread, skinny sidewalls. Nice and light though.
2.35. Fantastic hardcore/enduro tyre. Deep profile, bigger tread (more like the 2.5DH version) in dual ply, very flat-proof. Used these for 3 of the megavalanche events (on the rear mainly) and have been great. (you get snow, mud, dust, roots and rocks over there, in one days riding)
2.5 duel ply. Awesome, well used DH tyre. They have lost ground on the DH scene to other brands recently, but are still a good benchmark tyre.
Along with all that, (when it comes to the .35 & .5's, you have tread compound, (3c, 42a ect) and tyre pressure.
For general XC use, no tyre is shite these days really, its the rider, and the rider not having them setup right. You could have the worlds grippiest tyres going, come flying round a corner, loose it, & fall off! yeah, because it was a wet slippery root that caught you out! ..
Find all this lean it well over argument interesting - not always that easy on singletrack & if the trails are slippy, it means knocking back speed to allow the side to side flicks required. Sometimes it can be faster on a tyre that allows a more moderate lean - particularly applicable over rolling terrain where saddle height remains high & leaning requires more co-ordination & offers less weight distribution options than a low saddle.
That said, I like Maxxis Advantages & use them in any condition - like the Maxxis Aspens if/when the trails dry out, although find them quite manageable until it does get properly slippery.
I recall a Hutchinson tyre - Scorpion? - marketed as a capable mud tyre - nothing from dead centre until you've almost hit the deck, meaning fast but flowing turns we're taken with no feel for grip - have hit corners & bike totally slid out, only to grip & carve at a ridiculously steep angle, end result was either a big high side if caught unaware & unable to recover, or a monster carve that usually meant veering straight off the trail into the nearest tree.
Crossmarks on leafy, loamy trails can be great fun or a complete nightmare, it depends on rider & mood. I have had a stonking ride with massive sideways action & lots of close calls / friendly nudges with the trees, but another day, same tyre & conditions & had a nightmare, fighting the bike rather than flowing & really struggling to stay upright.
Hundreds of downhillers disagree with this thread. Nothing comes close to the good old High Roller.
Besides in the winter you should be running a Minion on the front if you arn't running a mud specific tyre anyway - as mud tyres are shit in anything but mud.
The OP probably has the CHEAPO HARD COMPOUND OEM tyres as they came with the bike!
I had a few issues going from high rollers to hans Dampfs. With hrs you just slap the bike over into flat corners stand on the outside pedal and it grips. Hans threw me on the floor a few times until I realised what was going on. Different tyres handle different.
I like to chuck the bike around and throw it over aggressively into a corner - some people like to ride smoothly - so these tyre's are probably not great for me then? I was so leant over the other day mid corner I was reminded of superbike lean angles and I had the front and rear drifting - and still managed to pick the bike up without dabbing! I truly have no idea why people don't like High Rollers. I'll stay away from Hans Dampfs then, I was about to try some as well!
spot on bwaarp. these are cheapo hard compound! I bet the softies are a world apart! Bottom line for me is do i opt for a pure mud beast which is a bastard everywhere else! decisions decisions!
The damp hans and bobby nicks remind me of kenda surprises, which I quite like up to a point.
Find all this lean it well over argument interesting - not always that easy on singletrack & if the trails are slippy, it means knocking back speed to allow the side to side flicks required.
Lower your saddle and you will find you can go round corners faster.
bwaarp - Membermud tyres are shit in anything but mud.
Tried the Baron/Der Baron? Not as good as a Minion or HR in the dry, but a long way from shit. Not as good as a full spike in the wet but then, not all the drawbacks of a spike.
I was so leant over the other day
..I saw Jesus*
*might have been Pete Scullion
Dirty Dans = traction
He's sliding around all over the place. Clearly terrible tread pattern.
I really can't understand the tyre fetishism on here.
jesus that dudes flying!
Everyone keeps saying that about the Barons, I may have to give em a go Northwind....but I do like the weight of my single ply High Rollers for my AM bike....those Barons are quite heavy for non ust tyres arn't they?
For me 2.5 dual ply HRs - solid, a known quantity - no punctures ever.
Tread design mean they like (need) to be leant over aggressively in tight fast corners - so for picking your way at slow/medium speed down a technical slippery trail in the wet I could see how they might not be ideal.
Anyway it's always easiest to blame the equipment.
bwaarp - MemberEveryone keeps saying that about the Barons, I may have to give em a go Northwind....but I do like the weight of my single ply High Rollers for my AM bike....those Barons are quite heavy for non ust tyres arn't they?
They're not light. And tbh they feel a wee bit insubstantial considering their weight, the sidewalls aren't thin but they're not thick either if you know what I mean. Never really sure where all the grams are.
I just looked up my tyre-fetish stuff and mine was way under the claimed weight, just over 750g. Not too shabby. I like 'em and I totally credit mine with the fact that I only crashed twice at the weekend, instead of millions of times 
Another fan here,
The High roller is the best all round tyre for all conditions dust, mud roots snow rocks grass etc.
2.35 60a s/p on the front dual ply on the back
I just leave them on all year
I’ve been riding a really old 1.9 and a 2.35 super tachy version and they are normally good for trails centres and downhill type stuff (not the skinny one) where the surface generally isn’t gloopy. However, to those of you rating this tyre as a good to great all-rounder for general riding to steep techy natural trails in muddy/gloopy conditions- seriously get a grip! Why would Maxxis make other types of tyres for those conditions if all you required was a High Roller? To those of you who say it’s due to poor riding technique- well it might be true for a few, but what is also true is that if you are a proper aggressive rider then look elsewhere as I guarantee this tyre will only reward you with a proper nightmare when faced with gloopy conditions.
I don'think ayone is saying its the gloop master
just that as an all round tyre it does OK
Yeah, someone doesn't understand what "allrounder" means I think?