Hope Eternity Seatp...
 

[Closed] Hope Eternity Seatpost

Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

they are looking goood ! just saw an advert in the latest MBR magazine for this long awaited seatpost.... soooooo when is this product going to be available..anyone know ?


 
Posted : 06/12/2009 8:29 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Does it look like a long metal tube with a bit on the end for fitting a saddle?


 
Posted : 06/12/2009 8:31 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

druidh - Dont be so daft!


 
Posted : 06/12/2009 8:34 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Does the "eternity" tag apply to the long wait for it then?


 
Posted : 06/12/2009 8:55 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

yes - says in the adverts


 
Posted : 06/12/2009 9:02 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Druidh - it sounds as if you're implying that it's just like all other posts...if so then you better let all Thompson seatpost owners know the same ๐Ÿ˜‰

I'd love either but can't justify/afford it when it does nothing better IMO than my EA30 post but costs alot more.....oh well.


 
Posted : 06/12/2009 9:53 pm
Posts: 4277
Full Member
 

[img] [/img]

While I'm a fan of the bolting system (in principle - I've just fitted a bonty post that has a sidewasys bolt - dead easy to adjust and avoids mudguards, lights, bags or anything mounted on the seatpost) I don't think it's a very attractive post.

๐Ÿ˜


 
Posted : 06/12/2009 9:56 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

wayhey thats the one.....


 
Posted : 06/12/2009 10:04 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

i think that is a nice looking post, i had a bonty one which was simila and was very easy to adjust. If i didnt use I beam posts and saddles i'd consider that in the fute


 
Posted : 06/12/2009 10:12 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I don't fancy the bonded on top of a tube head... I've seen them fail, and it seems like designs like Thomson's get rid of such a weakness


 
Posted : 06/12/2009 10:59 pm
Posts: 49
Free Member
 

nick - Thomson seem to be able to quantify their products on the strength in tests. Seems fair enough to me.


 
Posted : 06/12/2009 11:26 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Thats the trouble, i've only ever had cheaper posts that came with the bike.

I've not managed to break one yet so can't justify spending the extra cash when the cheaper posts have served me so well.

I would love to buy a Thomson/Hope but it won't make any difference to the ride but my wallet would be lighter i suppose ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 07/12/2009 10:13 am
Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

Hmmm...basically a Bonty/Maverick copy clamp, just machined and so more expensive to make and heavier ๐Ÿ˜


 
Posted : 07/12/2009 10:20 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

emailed hopetech and the post is out in the new year (tho they didnt say exactly when ? duh... so do i get 'thompson elite' or 'Hope Eternity'....i just cant make up my mind ? lol


 
Posted : 07/12/2009 11:03 am
Posts: 4
Full Member
 

For the same price I think I'd rather get a Thomson......no rational reason other than I don't think that Hope one looks fancy / bling enough!
(Yes it's shallow but, frankly, I don't care):-)


 
Posted : 07/12/2009 11:18 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Great clamp design as used by Bonty, Spesh etc, but the post looks cack.


 
Posted : 07/12/2009 11:22 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

thepost looks cack ? ooohhhhh....
just rang them anyway, and the post will be out in January....


 
Posted : 07/12/2009 11:47 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

thepost looks cack ? ooohhhhh....

Yes, yes it does.


 
Posted : 07/12/2009 11:49 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

lol oh dear ? so u prefur the thompson then do you..... is that A1 in your book then or is that cack too ? lol or is 'cack' your new 'Buzz word' ?....


 
Posted : 07/12/2009 12:12 pm
Posts: 3381
Free Member
 

i don't think i've ever come across someone SO excited about a seatpost before... ๐Ÿ˜ฏ


 
Posted : 07/12/2009 12:16 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I didn't realise I had an old 'buzz word'.


 
Posted : 07/12/2009 12:16 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

i don't think i've ever come across someone SO excited about a seatpost before...

Quite.


 
Posted : 07/12/2009 12:17 pm
 Dave
Posts: 1026
Free Member
 

[i]and avoids mudguards, lights, bags or anything mounted on the seatpost[/i]

All my seatposts avoid all the avove :o)


 
Posted : 07/12/2009 1:16 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

just wondering about the fixing tho on the new hope design..... would a thompson post be better ? 'Hope' dont make bad things tho ?
geeeez i just cant make up my mind. lol... wonder if 'singletrack office' will be getting any soon (fresh goods)...just so i could pop down to have a look ...hmmmm


 
Posted : 08/12/2009 9:16 am
Posts: 9018
Free Member
 

I can't understand why anyone would use anything other than Thomson for stems and posts. Been using them on various bikes since Thomson first made an appearance over here in about 1999 and they've been faultless.


 
Posted : 08/12/2009 9:18 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

ok if i went for Thompson :

my current seatpost is size 27.2 but those sizes also come in 250mm , 330mm and 410mm ....which one do i get ?


 
Posted : 08/12/2009 9:29 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I can't understand why anyone would use anything other than Thomson for stems and posts.

Because they're really expensive and don't offer any great advantages over cheaper versions? Don't get me wrong they are lovely bits of kit and I have a nice thomson stem, but it's an extravagance really.


 
Posted : 08/12/2009 9:30 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

What size is your frame and your current seat post?


 
Posted : 08/12/2009 9:32 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

as above ...seatpost 27.2 ( cant find any mm sizing on post... and frame size = 14 inch ( im only a 5ft in height) lol thats why i have the smallest frame.


 
Posted : 08/12/2009 10:23 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The 250mm one is probably the one to get for a 14" frame.

410mm is definitely too long and most of a 330mm one would be inside the frame.


 
Posted : 08/12/2009 10:30 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I can't understand why anyone would use anything other than Thomson for stems and posts. Been using them on various bikes since Thomson first made an appearance over here in about 1999 and they've been faultless.

I don't use them any more, too expensive and heavy, look nice though.


 
Posted : 08/12/2009 10:56 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

ok cheers...


 
Posted : 08/12/2009 10:57 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

>they are looking goood!<

It's by Hope, it will work but as for looks / design I'd have to say it's hardly mould breaking stuff. The old XYO was a piece of kit that looked good / lasted an eternity...


 
Posted : 08/12/2009 12:16 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

MIKE ::: well my original post is 325mm at the moment ! so the 330mm shud be fine shud it not ???


 
Posted : 08/12/2009 3:14 pm
Posts: 41786
Free Member
 

The only snaped stem I've ever seen was a Thompson

The only seatpost I've ever bent was an Easton

I'll be sticking to titec/truvative stuff with its lifetime/5year warenties from now on!


 
Posted : 08/12/2009 3:31 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yes, Elaine, 330mm will also be fine.


 
Posted : 08/12/2009 3:33 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Anyone know if the Eternity is available yet? they said January, but it doesn't seem to be selling anywhere?


 
Posted : 18/01/2010 12:01 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm a larger fella and have bent loads of posts, well five or six anyway, over the years. Then I got a Thomson it's indestructable afaict.


 
Posted : 18/01/2010 12:26 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I snapped a Thomson seat post, not running it 'wrong' - they are not bomb proof.

Hope looks great I think, plus it's British... ๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 07/07/2011 11:14 pm