Forum menu
Hardtail- which lig...
 

[Closed] Hardtail- which light but comfy longtravel hardtail?

 hora
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#3386155]

Must be (in order of importance):

Whippy
Light
Comfy- springy, not solid rear.

A sort of SC Chameleon without the boxstay rear stays that beats you up.


 
Posted : 24/11/2011 12:03 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

does it need a good resale value?


 
Posted : 24/11/2011 12:05 pm
 tang
Posts: 1
Free Member
 

Cotic soul


 
Posted : 24/11/2011 12:05 pm
Posts: 251
Full Member
 

Curtis 🙂

have a look at the Kinesis XC130 and the Decade versa (120mm).

not quite sure how long 'long travel' is, tbh.


 
Posted : 24/11/2011 12:06 pm
Posts: 9043
Free Member
 

Depends how long travel you want Mark. My old Soul was all those things and the new ones take 140mm forks. Gave mine a pasting too and never let me down...


 
Posted : 24/11/2011 12:06 pm
Posts: 4116
Full Member
 

I like my Chumba HX1. I've just changed from a P7, it's definitely lighter and whippier. More comfortable than you's expect from an alu frame too. Done a couple of longish rides on it and had no comfort issues at all.


 
Posted : 24/11/2011 12:07 pm
 hora
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Cotic soul

I briefly had a large Cotic Soul and found it 'too big' for me. Should I look at a medium (or even..a small?!) one?

I'm 6ft1/33inside- but prefer shorter top tubes of upto23" actual MAX.

Does anyone have a medium Cotic that I could have a quick spin on for fit?


 
Posted : 24/11/2011 12:09 pm
Posts: 13865
Free Member
 

The Stanton Slackline comes in a 18" that's in between a large & a medium Soul.


 
Posted : 24/11/2011 12:11 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I was after the same thing, and will be ordering my first steel frame (Cotic Soul) in about 10 minutes .


 
Posted : 24/11/2011 12:11 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Whyte 19 Trail Steel.

Just gone from full suss to this, love it, very nimble and capable. Has adjustable dropouts that affect wheelbase and angles too, even running singlespeed if thats your bag. 120mm fork standard which i find is ideal for my riding.

[IMG] [/IMG]


 
Posted : 24/11/2011 12:14 pm
Posts: 57390
Full Member
 

It doesn't matter really though, does it? You'll only have it a week. What we looking at realistically? One quick run round Calderdale?


 
Posted : 24/11/2011 12:14 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I am not sure which bike was next in the sweepstake http://singletrackworld.com/forum/topic/who-fancies-a-horas-next-bike-sweepstake/


 
Posted : 24/11/2011 12:16 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

imo the whole ribbing hora about his bike is a bit done to death now?


 
Posted : 24/11/2011 12:22 pm
 hora
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Si thats too stiff for me. If it was stiffness that I was after I'd buy a Chameleon again. Thanks tho.


 
Posted : 24/11/2011 12:24 pm
 hora
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I'd love a ti frame but not the Ti price though 😳


 
Posted : 24/11/2011 12:27 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Si thats too stiff for me. If it was stiffness that I was after I'd buy a Chameleon again. Thanks tho.

Have you ridden one? If not, that's a stupid thing to say.

I have one and was very surprised (and pleased) at how compliant and comfortable it is.


 
Posted : 24/11/2011 12:31 pm
 wors
Posts: 3796
Full Member
 

I'd be looking at the Slackline, in fact i'm seriously thinking about getting rid of my blue pig for one. Fancy a blue pig?


 
Posted : 24/11/2011 12:31 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Charge Duster?


 
Posted : 24/11/2011 12:31 pm
 GW
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Whippy = short top tube, short stays, tight* H/A, good standover and low(ish) BB (forget longer forks and stems too)
Light = not steel
Comfy = MTFU (stand up!)
springy = down to the rider, a stiffer rear end will actually be more "springy" with the input of a decent rider
not solid rear = MTFU (choose good lines, go faster, get off the brake and use your legs to absorb rough terrain and you won't feel so beat up)

*not overly steep but def not overly slack

not what you wanted to hear but it's the truth.


 
Posted : 24/11/2011 12:34 pm
Posts: 2811
Full Member
 

cotic soul here too, somewhat predictably.


 
Posted : 24/11/2011 12:35 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Hora....if your referring to the Whyte above its STEEL not Ti 🙂


 
Posted : 24/11/2011 12:37 pm
 hora
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Slackline weighs circa 5.6lb?

Springy? I rode a Sanderson Life and that was definitely comfy/springy. I keep coming back to this- but thinking of a smaller size.


 
Posted : 24/11/2011 12:37 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Pity you're not a bit shorter. I'm selling on my Ti Ragley - but it's in short-arse size.


 
Posted : 24/11/2011 12:38 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

carbon 456? light & comfy, not sure I've ridden a whippy hardtail since the old skinny steel days


 
Posted : 24/11/2011 12:42 pm
 JonR
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

carbon 456 Looks are a bit shakey but is meant to be nice.


 
Posted : 24/11/2011 12:53 pm
Posts: 14171
Full Member
 

Cotic Soul. Mine was awesome round Afan on Monday. GW doesn't seem to understand that a Cotic Soul can be built up plenty light enough, a reasonably slack head angle is a good thing for most riders and you can stand up loads yet still benefit from frame compliance (and big tyres) because the kickback through the pedals is less.

Despite his boring and boorish manner this is true:

"...a stiffer rear end will actually be more "springy" with the input of a decent rider... ...choose good lines, go faster, get off the brake and use your legs to absorb rough terrain and you won't feel so beat up..."

But a more compliant rear end will be yet more springy with that same rider.


 
Posted : 24/11/2011 12:57 pm
 hora
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I'd like to have a spin on a C456- had a quick one in the carpark on PeterPoddys but he didn't throw it down Cavedale too quickly 😉

So shortlist

Small or medium Soul
Sanderson Life (16")
C456
Whyte's only do a full bike and I'm really after frame only sadly.


 
Posted : 24/11/2011 1:06 pm
Posts: 251
Full Member
 

hora - I'll have a medium c456 for sale soon - really good nick (I bought it new and change frames more regularly than you're reputed to). I'm the same height inside leg as you. mail in profile if you're interested.


 
Posted : 24/11/2011 1:09 pm
 hora
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

YGM


 
Posted : 24/11/2011 1:11 pm
Posts: 14171
Full Member
 

The C456 looks great too - long top tube though. I ride a medium Soul which is a great fit at 5'10" but I find the medium 456 a bit too long so I'd have gone for a small one of them.


 
Posted : 24/11/2011 1:13 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Moots YBB?


 
Posted : 24/11/2011 1:28 pm
 GW
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

GW doesn't seem to understand that a Cotic Soul can be built up plenty light enough
oh, I understand perfectly, but if weight is important to you why bother with a heavy cotic frame when you could have a lighter, stiffer and stronger frame from another brand made from another material? oh, yeah, coz it's STW and you MUST all have a steel frame from either Cy or Brant to harp on about 🙄


 
Posted : 24/11/2011 1:37 pm
Posts: 21016
Full Member
 

Druidh, which Ragley and how much?


 
Posted : 24/11/2011 1:38 pm
Posts: 1676
Free Member
 

20" Voodoo D-jab Ti frame - £450 to you.


 
Posted : 24/11/2011 1:46 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

My current rockhopper frame is a pretty light 3.3lb, the new soul looks like 4.3lb giving a 24lb bike, so still reasonably light once all the bits are swapped across.


 
Posted : 24/11/2011 1:55 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I had a cotic soul in size small, I like you like my bikes on the small side but the soul was just a little small tbh.
I am 5/11 with a 31 inside leg so I think you should look at a medium.
Great bike the soul, but I now have a Sovereign 😆


 
Posted : 24/11/2011 1:56 pm
Posts: 1851
Free Member
 

To a fair extent, it depends what you plan to do with it and how heavy you are. My choice is a Dialled Alpine, still comfy, rewards a confident rider with great handling and some attitude. I've ridden both in real hills and found the Cotic was too flexy for rocky terrain. And I'm only 12 stone.


 
Posted : 24/11/2011 2:04 pm
Posts: 7365
Free Member
 

oh, yeah, coz it's STW and you MUST all have a steel frame from either Cy or Brant to harp on about

Nah, my DMR Trailstar rocks!


 
Posted : 24/11/2011 2:23 pm
Posts: 3640
Full Member
 

I've got a medium Soul if you want ago. I'm in Leicester if thats any good to you?


 
Posted : 24/11/2011 2:24 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

or alternately:

coz it's STW and you MUST NOT have a steel frame from either Cy or Brant so you can harp on about it

😉


 
Posted : 24/11/2011 2:36 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Ohh, those Stanton Slakclines look nice.
Handbuilt they say...where? In the UK?


 
Posted : 24/11/2011 2:37 pm
Posts: 2809
Free Member
 

Hx1s are a lot more comfortable than you'd think. The mk1 version was stiff and a bit trying after a couple of hours, the new version is loads more compliant even on a "frame transfer" build.

In terms of comfort and springiness there's very little difference between that and my Scion for a similar build.


 
Posted : 24/11/2011 2:39 pm
Posts: 2087
Free Member
 

Ohh, those Stanton Slakclines look nice.
Handbuilt they say...where? In the UK?

Handbuilt means they put the full builds together in the UK. The frames are typical taiwanese built.


 
Posted : 24/11/2011 3:08 pm
Posts: 4338
Free Member
 

Ohh, those Stanton Slakclines look nice.

[url= http://singletrackworld.com/forum/topic/stanton-slackline ]
They ride nice as well[/url]


 
Posted : 24/11/2011 3:09 pm
Page 1 / 3