Gorrick Enduro: You...
 

[Closed] Gorrick Enduro: You weren't there mannnnn, you wouldnt understand...............

Posts: 41786
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Well I only made it 2 and a bit laps into the 7 lap 'race'

A combination of a completely seized front mech (oddly, the rear shifting was still flawless) and no brakes (I did still have spare pads, but in those conditions they'd have lasted 5 minutes tops, a nearly new pair of sintered pads, well bedded in (very well bedded in) lasted less than the first lap, and the organics up front weren't doing much better. Going to investigate later why the organics ( not particularly well bedded in, in fact) lasted longer!

Other casualties:
Big stack on the first lap, think I've twisted my knee a bit, came round a sweeping right hander, caught a perpendicular root, and the skill Vs gravity battle ended with me taking a stack into the ground at a fair wack.

Ever watched yourself crash on helmet/bar camera, its quite surreal!

Probably an entire new drivetrain needed, even putoline wax was ground off.

On the plus side, I didn't finish last, It may be costing me an entire new drivetrain, but I climbed 3 places through attrition on the 2nd lap 🙂


 
Posted : 02/05/2010 3:00 pm
 br
Posts: 18125
Free Member
 

Us too, had my rear pads already for most of winter without a problem, and they'd 'gone' by the 5th mile on the first lap...

And my riding buddy was also the same.

We left early...


 
Posted : 02/05/2010 3:12 pm
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

Soooo glad I didnt go 🙂


 
Posted : 02/05/2010 3:15 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Me too Rich! Fair play (/more fool you! 😉 ) to anyone who did ride.

And what was that fireroad to get into Swinley all about... that alone was enough to put me off!


 
Posted : 02/05/2010 3:25 pm
Posts: 1
Full Member
 

I changed pads F&R at the end of the 2nd lap - they were grinding metal halfway through lap 2 - and at the end of the 3rd lap they'd both gone to the metal again, so I retired. An expensive race - 4 pairs of pads 🙁 Left for an early bath and slid all the way out (only time I've ever wanted a 4x4) - the fireroad was getting nasty so am glad I got out early!

Guy I was talking to at the end said the three leaders (Ian Leitch & Rob Lee included) on the 7 lap race all pulled out at the end of lap 2 with no pads left either. I felt much better knowing that!!!


 
Posted : 02/05/2010 3:31 pm
 Joe
Posts: 1721
Free Member
 

I love the gorrick 100. Always some drama.


 
Posted : 02/05/2010 3:35 pm
Posts: 1
Full Member
 

As a thought, are there any brakes out there that won't eat pads in half a lap in conditions like those???


 
Posted : 02/05/2010 3:41 pm
Posts: 7267
Full Member
 

Ditto All of the above. I hadn't pre paid so should have binned it off as soon as I got there. All the way there up the A3 it was dry and I could see bits of blue sky. As soon as I left the M3 the rain started , and didnt stop all day.
Entered the 4 hour , well within my ability , paid my £23 . Started at the back as I have no confidence in myself to do anything other than ride to the paper shop. Lost front brake after 6 miles , and the rear after 8. Far too slip slidey to rely on skill to get you down some of the descents with no stopping power and the levers on the bars. Did 1 lap in 1hr 25min , had my milkshake got changed and drove home.
Cost about £10 per mile ridden all in .Bargain.


 
Posted : 02/05/2010 3:44 pm
Posts: 41786
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I was the one in the MG midget by they way, plenty of single-trackers passing buy recognised it!

Ohh, and also glad I left early, the midget was an 'entertaining' drive up the fire road, spent 90% of it sideways" A load of sand/water seems to have got everywhere in the engine bay causing the throttle to stick as well!

Think it'll be an expensive race, even though I got a free entry! Tim Fisher (ti29er) apparently managed 2 laps at the back of the field before admitting defeat.


 
Posted : 02/05/2010 4:39 pm
Posts: 7267
Full Member
 

Nice to meet you Thisisnotaspoon. Bet people are still trying to get out of Swinley now. My washing machine is doing battle with the mud and my SPD's are in the oven in case i need them tomorrow.


 
Posted : 02/05/2010 5:21 pm
 br
Posts: 18125
Free Member
 

thisisnotaspoon

We followed you out, couldn't resist a picture.

And for those who weren't there, its was pissing down.

[IMG] [/IMG]

[IMG] [/IMG]


 
Posted : 02/05/2010 5:45 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Trails yesterday were great then at 10pm the heavens opened.

When I woke and looked out the window I decided not to bother. A wise decision in retrospect


 
Posted : 02/05/2010 5:48 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

😆


 
Posted : 02/05/2010 5:49 pm
Posts: 7267
Full Member
 

Kwality pics.


 
Posted : 02/05/2010 5:53 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yes it was tough. Big pat on the back for all who rode.
I managed 4 laps, 2 bikes, 1 brake and no hands or feet. ( the latter two are slowly warming up!)


 
Posted : 02/05/2010 6:06 pm
 DT78
Posts: 10066
Free Member
 

I won't be pre-paying again....

went for the 5 lapper, my rear pad lasted the first lap, front the second lap.

was suffering horrendous chain suck, then finally got the chain really badly jammed and snapped it which took me 40 odd minutes to sort. I just could not get the facking power link to engage with all the grit everywhere.

Also broke my trusty chain tool trying to fix above mechanical

Limped back to finish the 3rd lap and decided to go home.

Expensive ride

It would have been such a stunning and quick race in the dry 🙁


 
Posted : 02/05/2010 6:11 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

Rear brake was back to the bar and having no effect by the end of lap one! The front was metal on metal and having little effect! Some serious speedway action saw me get through 4 laps, and finish 2nd, which was nice! So cold on the last lap I just couldn't get the power down, bit of a shame, as I'd been leading for the first 3 laps!

Can't see at all well at the moment either, so much crap in my eyes!

Daren't look at my bike either, sure the chain and cassette are trashed! Plus two sets of pads and probably rotors. Humbug!


 
Posted : 02/05/2010 6:49 pm
Posts: 4465
Full Member
 

Was it raining then?! nearly went but due to my mate who lives close by being stuck in America still due to the volcano I decided to ride Enduro6, bone dry all weekend, ground just damp enough to provided lots of traction rather than dust. perfect!


 
Posted : 02/05/2010 7:13 pm
Posts: 41786
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I wasn't half miserable driving home, didn't help that something was amis under the bonnet and the revs were stuck at 2500 rather than idle.


 
Posted : 02/05/2010 7:18 pm
 Taff
Posts: 4
Free Member
 

I was gutted I couldn't make it but given the weather in Kent this morning I'm glad I didn't go. Will do the next one on Chi though.


 
Posted : 02/05/2010 7:45 pm
Posts: 66
Free Member
 

I did 2 out of 3. My brakes totally died just into the 2nd lap, I managed to mince my way down all the descents but hadn't brought any spare pads with me so called it a day at the end of the lap.

The fireroad was interesting on the way out - RWD and mud is always a good mix. I managed a few sideways moments on the way up the steepest hill. As well as cleaning the bike the car needs a decent wash as I seemed to get mud all over that too...


 
Posted : 02/05/2010 8:00 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

[url= http://timelaps.co.uk/assets/uploads/EventReport.aspx?eventID=120SurreyHill02/05/2010 ]Results[/url] are up. No women did more than 4, and no men finished the 7-lapper, that has to be a first!


 
Posted : 02/05/2010 8:02 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I did 5 out of 7, not even the lure of a prize would have sent me round for a 6th or even 7th lap. Nearly packed after lap 4 and started heading back to the start, but had a word with myself and after a few mins got going again. My body started to lose it a bit on lap 4, wasting too many calories trying to keep myself warm and I started going backwards.

Pads wore a bit but still had plenty left. Servowave Shimano SLX, the extra gap between rotor and pad made the difference.

Shame really as the course was riding well at 8:30! Really enjoyed the first lap.

Guy I was talking to at the end said the three leaders (Ian Leitch & Rob Lee included) on the 7 lap race all pulled out at the end of lap 2 with no pads left either. I felt much better knowing that!!!
To be fair Rob wasn't at the front today, it was Steve Webb, Ant White and Ian Leitch who were just ahead of me on lap 3. My visions of grandeur after that never quite happened though!


 
Posted : 02/05/2010 8:42 pm
 DezB
Posts: 54367
Free Member
 

Sometimes you gotta be thankful for family responsibilities!! 🙂


 
Posted : 02/05/2010 9:02 pm
Posts: 1
Full Member
 

thisisnotaspoon - fair play to you for going there in an MG midget in this weather. Respect!!!!


 
Posted : 02/05/2010 9:09 pm
Posts: 1
Full Member
 

willsimmons - interesting point on the servowave brakes. I was on xtr m975 which are fine in the dry but they were simply crap in the conditions - worked well but made a rubbing noise ALL THE WAY THROUGH. I have servowave xt on the other bike though - do you really think that they made a big difference with the adjustment? THX!


 
Posted : 02/05/2010 9:13 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

GC, in my experience and opinion they do. I changed to them for the exact reason you have stated that I used to find with my 975s and Formula Oros. The 'noise' = 2.5 h riding in the Peak District. Since changing I've not experienced the same problem and I can't remember the last time I changed my pads now.


 
Posted : 02/05/2010 9:19 pm
Posts: 6063
Full Member
 

Aha - thisisnotaspoon, I saw you yesterday! In fact, there was a lady at the visitor centre as I bought my permit on Saturday morning who said there was a green MG with its lights on. She didn't think it was a mountainbiker, she said... but I saw it leaving with the bike in the passenger seat.

So that's why you wanted the maps, eh? 😉
Saturday morning, btw, was lovely at Swinley; there were clearly a few people out checking things out - a few shot past me in lycra looking very serious. It was nice tho, first time I've been out since November, and I even saw a couple of deer 🙂


 
Posted : 02/05/2010 9:34 pm
Posts: 1
Full Member
 

willsimmons - many thanks for that. I really like the M975's but want a brake that will work in the wet. I'll try the servowaves in mud and see what they're like in comparison.


 
Posted : 02/05/2010 11:25 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

That Tim Fisher - what a guy! 😉
Ying & yang.
Free ride (ying) but the payment in bike bits and wet car (yang).
I on the other hand, watched MotoGp from my sofa.


 
Posted : 02/05/2010 11:35 pm
Posts: 10
Free Member
 

You guys riding in that were mad. I bailed - saw the four lap start and the state of the trail down to the lake and didn't bother getting changed. Went back this morning and its still a mudfest. The trails are completely wrecked with so many riders. Respect to anyone who rode yesterday!


 
Posted : 03/05/2010 12:04 pm
Posts: 40432
Free Member
 

Glad I couldn't make it as well, though yesterday morning's Epping ride wasn't exactly a picnic either.

Was Sunday's race worse than the first Brass Monkey winter one?


 
Posted : 03/05/2010 12:14 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

National shortage of brake pads coming this week then! Same bike destroying conditions at Eastern XC race at Tunstall, finished 7 lap race using the trees to brake.

Have to laugh hearing that people racing at the Enduro6, the most slated track in the UK (by some)had fun, and those at the Southern more weather friendly course, had a mare.


 
Posted : 03/05/2010 12:17 pm
Posts: 832
Free Member
 

I thought the course held up well. The mud didn't make any of it unrideable. So not as bad as some Mayhems/SITSs. And the descents were great even without working brakes. What I found hard was the cold (I didn't wear enough) and being of marginal fitness anyway for 100kms' racing, so I wasn't fit enough to slog round continuously with no rest on the flat bits.


 
Posted : 03/05/2010 12:24 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

"The trails are completely wrecked with so many riders. Respect to anyone who rode yesterday!"

I find it hard to find much respect in my heart for the organisers and competitors for wrecking the trails. 😕


 
Posted : 03/05/2010 12:44 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

Those same people that re-invest a lot of the time and money made back into the trails?

It was a May event, middle of winter maybe, but no one could've expected conditions to be that bad, you can't call an event off because of potential trail damage. Swinley's big, the trails to have suffered aren't the ones that'd normally get ridden, and we didn't touch Crowthorne, so there's plenty of 'untrashed' trail for you!

Joolze's photos are up:

[url= http://joolzedymond.com/photocart/index.php?do=photocart&viewImage=90616&q=411 ]First lap[/url]

[url= http://joolzedymond.com/photocart/index.php?do=photocart&viewImage=90622&zoom=yes&q=411 ]4th lap[/url]

[url= http://joolzedymond.com/photocart/index.php?do=photocart&viewImage=91077 ]Aftermath[/url]


 
Posted : 03/05/2010 2:11 pm
Posts: 17843
 

I find it hard to find much respect in my heart for the organisers and competitors for wrecking the trails. 😕

+1


 
Posted : 03/05/2010 2:35 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

Do you think they should've cancelled it on the morning then?

Or do you think there's no place for events which attract a lot of riders? (serious questions)


 
Posted : 03/05/2010 2:38 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I would have understood if they had pulled the race but considering that in here in the UK we dont seem to exercise any degree of restraint when it comes to giving trails time off when the weather is crap - I think the response they would have got would not have been pretty..

ps cheers for the link njee


 
Posted : 03/05/2010 2:47 pm
Posts: 17843
 

Do you think they should've cancelled it on the morning then?

No.

Or do you think there's no place for events which attract a lot of riders? (serious questions)

In the past my views on racing have been misunderstood. I am NOT anti-racing but feel that the number of entrants should be lowered. Seems unfair to me that folk who have paid £20 for an annual permit should pretty much be restricted as to where they can ride.


 
Posted : 03/05/2010 2:49 pm
Posts: 41786
Free Member
Topic starter
 

The entry includes a day permit though, whether you have an annual one or not though IIRC?

The trails weren't that wrecked by the racing. They were either armoured (tank traps, labyrinth etc and didn't seem to be suffering) or bits I wouldn't bother riding anyway (what was with that off camber mud slide 2/3 the way round? was that cut especially for the event?)

And plenty of riders without number boards coming in both directions along the trails.


 
Posted : 03/05/2010 2:59 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

That off camber mud bit was to practice your "cross" skills! I couldnt help but laugh everytime I did it..Massive **** factor & highly amusing 😈


 
Posted : 03/05/2010 3:05 pm
Posts: 6063
Full Member
 

In a past life I used to be an orienteerer, til I worked out it was nuts, and there were often similar discussions there about the sheer number of people causing erosion that takes ages to recover.
The difference is that Swinley is used year round, so it doesn't really get any time to recover until other riders are through there. If you look at some of the busier parts of Peaslake you can see how over the year the rain and too many riders just wreck the trails.
With somewhere as large as Swinley, there's an argument for closing some of the trails for a couple of weeks after something like the Gorrick to give them time to dry up a bit.

On a mostly unrelated topic, can someone expand on this servowave discussion for me? Is the story basically that the Shimano lever pushes more piston through the level pull, and so the pads are slightly clearer of the mud build-up on the rotor? What's the tradeoff?


 
Posted : 03/05/2010 3:10 pm
Posts: 41786
Free Member
Topic starter
 

basicly..............

The pad moves a lot further relative to the lever on SW brakes in the first part of the travel. After this there's a step and the pads don't move as far but the lever keeps pulling. Thus you can build a brake with big pad clearance which would normally be very underpowered, but still have lots of power.


 
Posted : 03/05/2010 3:22 pm
Posts: 17843
 

Years ago, trails were routinely closed off to allow recovery. New trails were cut to replace them.


 
Posted : 03/05/2010 3:22 pm
Posts: 1
Full Member
 

I'm not being difficult here but . . . .

I think reluctant and cinnamon girl have a valid point on the trails - assuming everyone went there to trash the place. I don't believe that was the case though - the riders went to race and not specifically ruin the enjoyment of trails for everyone else afterwards. There is a difference to be fair.

Trail management is an issue moving forward though - have you contacted Gorrick to discuss this??


 
Posted : 03/05/2010 4:09 pm
 gee
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Cinnamon Girl -

So you've paid £20 for an annual permit. I do too.

Our £20 fee works out to £0.05 per day.

There are no more than 5 events at Swinley/Crowthorne each year (probably over estimating here).

That means a total "loss" of £0.25

As someone who does most of these event, I feel responsible. What's your Paypal address, I'll re-imburse you for your loss.

On a separate note, I do agree that the trails at Swinley are degenerating with more and more riders using the place - this has nothing to do with racing. Like the North Downs area, this place is a victim of its own success. For example, the trail running from the Reservoir away from Full 9 Yards (it has a few steps on a tight right hand corner half way down) is very old. I've been riding it for at least 10 years and it has remained unchanged in most of that time. In the last 6 months at least 3 or 4 new "fall line" descents have been built on the hillside which are now wrecking the original trail. The work BOB do maintaining the trails is excellent - the "ginger trails" or whatever you want to call them have really helped a lot. However, small group of volunteers is not going to be able to keep up with the volume of traffic the place gets. Sustainability should be high on the Forest's agenda but doesn't seem to be. I know it's privately owned - is it managed by the Forestry?

GB


 
Posted : 03/05/2010 5:38 pm
Posts: 17843
 

Gee - I appreciate your offer but that's not the solution, is it!!

But I have to disagree with your comment that the degeneration has nothing to do with racing. As you rightly say, more and more riders are using Swinley. However, I do feel that when you have over 500 riders racing on the one day, there will inevitably be some trail damage/erosion.

Swinley is unique in that it isn't branded as a 'trail centre' although it is debatable whether folk think it is! In some ways it would be helpful if trails were graded so as to avoid accidents and the air ambulance wasn't such a frequent visitor.

Sustainability does need to be high on the mtb agenda though. I've used the Forest for donkey's years for walking, dog walking and running (with a race number) so have seen first-hand the huge changes.

Funny though, with the ridiculous cost of petrol, one would expect people to use their local trails more.


 
Posted : 03/05/2010 6:21 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Unbelievable, I never thought it would be harder than the muc-off! My lapierres brakes were shot after two laps and I was finished after 3,my lad managed 1 bless him. 70 quid on pads, plus discs and I nearly killed the vectra leaving on that exit fireroad! The hardest thing i've ever done and the coldest I've ever been by far. See you next year 🙂
511


 
Posted : 03/05/2010 6:27 pm
 gee
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I didn't mean that the racing causes none of the damage - just not the majority of it.

"one would expect people to use their local trails more."

I think most people are. If you live in London, as 8 million people do these days, where do you go to ride? North Downs or Swinley are natural destnations these days. It's sort of like the Downs in that it's a trail centre but not really. As I said, this is something for the forest management to decide. It is far easier for them to just ban us riding (and racing) there than sort things out sustainably, sadly.

GB


 
Posted : 03/05/2010 6:41 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Unlike the Forrestry Commision, Crown Estate hasn't been looking to maximise it's revenue potential in recent years. However as their profits feed directly into HM Treasury this situation is unlikely to continue.

The closet they come to a trail centre at the moment is Glen Livet which has a number of way-marked trails and there are proposals for a bike centre with 7 stanes style trails to be developed. If that is successful who knows what they might be tempted to do with Swinley.

Interestingly there are no requirements for permits/insurance to ride at Glen Livet.

I see from the Crown Estate web site that they recently advertised for a new Chief Forrester for the Windsor Estate (incorporates Swinley) and I'm sure who ever they have selected will have their own ideas of what to do with the large number of MTBers now using the forest and the impact that has.


 
Posted : 03/05/2010 7:03 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Only Gorrick would organize a race around Crowthorne woods after the worst weather for years. I have been walking and riding around Swinley for the past 25 years. The single most damaging element is racing. The trails change and erode but the races destroy them. You say “a small group of volunteers is not going to be able to keep up with the volume of traffic the place gets” I have been looking after the corkscrew in Crowthorne woods for 3 years that includes clearing all the crap left after the last tree cutting when the trail was blocked. I can cope with the year to year traffic. But one race does more damage than a good years riding. You say Gorrick make new trails true they made the twisty banked bits leading to jump gully. But 3 years ago one of these races destroyed them and it was a year befor the repair. On average after a race the trails can’t be ridden for a month longer in bad weather.


 
Posted : 03/05/2010 7:07 pm
 br
Posts: 18125
Free Member
 

[i]Only Gorrick would organize a race around Crowthorne woods after the worst weather for years[/i]

Mate, they didn't organise it [b]after[/b] - it happened to rain on the day of the event...


 
Posted : 03/05/2010 7:18 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Not this race the last XC race around Crowthorne woods, sorry if not making myself clear.


 
Posted : 03/05/2010 7:22 pm
 gee
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Pete - and you have done a great job. I just think the place needs proper looking after to cope with the volume of riders. I have no bias on how that work is funded - just an opinion that it needs doing. If the races do as much damage as you say, perhaps more needs to come from there. However, the trail linking the top of Full 9 Yards to Crowthorne hasn't been raced on for a while and was ruined this winter - a 10ft wide bog. I remember that being a singletrack not too many years ago - and that's without any racing.

"Only Gorrick would organize a race around Crowthorne woods after the worst weather for years"

But it had been dry as a bone for a month prior to the race. I rode there on Friday and it was dry. Unfortunately you can't just cancel the event. Look at SITS/Mayhem etc for comparisons with dreadful weather. There needs to be another solution.

GB


 
Posted : 03/05/2010 7:24 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

This is just what I see and what I think. It’s not good to have winter races around a track that can’t take it. There seemed to be many people on the forums after the snow talking about not riding and respecting the trails that were damaged. Also the Crowthorne area is FC land so Gorrick can’t do anything to repair the damage. It’s just not good. I would love to spend my Saturdays in Swinley with a spade and wheel barrow. I would not ask for anything in return but with Gorrick races it would be like a doctor gives you an ibuprofen after you blow your head off. I have help Gorrick to build some of the trails before you all hang me.


 
Posted : 03/05/2010 7:37 pm
 gee
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Pete - I do agree with you and really appreciate the huge amount of effort you put in. I don't intend to hang you.

How come the FC means Gorrick can't do anything to repair the damage?

GB


 
Posted : 03/05/2010 7:40 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Gorrick cover the Crown estates they can’t touch Forestry Commission land. I don’t think you will hang me but normally if you talk about trail work someone will tell you they will ban riding in swinley. I don’t make new trails I just dig drainage and move crap.


 
Posted : 03/05/2010 7:47 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

it's not a huge amount of effort it,s a few hours every few weeks.


 
Posted : 03/05/2010 7:48 pm
Posts: 1
Full Member
 

Pete - thanks for your efforts on the trail building! Interesting point about the Gorrick races causing more damage than perhaps we'd been aware of - fair point and thanks for making that (along with cinnamon girl!)


 
Posted : 03/05/2010 7:48 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

glenncampbell thank you


 
Posted : 03/05/2010 7:52 pm
 gee
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Interesting discussion this. I certainly always thought that racing on those trails wasn't responsible for that much erosion and damage compared to the other 364 days in the year.


 
Posted : 03/05/2010 8:10 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

On a nice Sunday I will see 40+ riders on 15miles of track. On a wet day I will see 5, on a wet race day it’s 300 on ten miles of track.


 
Posted : 03/05/2010 8:33 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I understand people want to race on bikes, but for me the damage and speed removes any fun. Very few people I know who ride race as well.


 
Posted : 03/05/2010 8:37 pm
Posts: 20597
Full Member
 

Racing (of any sort) pretty much wrecks trails, I've seen it with motorsport, running, horse trials and MTB.

A trail that can happily support 100 riders (or horses/runners etc) in the course of a day can't cope with 100 riders every 30 minutes going twice the speed of a "normal" MTBer, especially in the wet.

I learnt to find my way around Swinley by following the tracks from the last XC race, they were visible for a month afterwards. Not really sure what the answer is - perhaps a system of trail rotation where they close sections for a month or so? Better/more trail maintenance at the risk of turning it into a full-on trail centre?


 
Posted : 03/05/2010 8:43 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Not much else to add to what CG, Petetheplumber etc have said. And thanks Pete - have appreciated your efforts clearing out the corkscrew before too. Regardless of the rights and wrongs, fact is they have had an additional race there already this year owing to a cancellation at another venue (ok, the weather wasn't like the weekend), the folk that maintain the trails are well meant and (largely) appreciated but they don't seem to want help from other folk, the Crown Estate and FC aren't putting much in and the place is seeing a lot more traffic. I think something needs doing to make Swinley more sustainable for the future, because the way things are going some stuff will be damaged beyond repair (well, at least what the current custodians can do given their limited time, resources and trail building skills).


 
Posted : 03/05/2010 9:21 pm
Posts: 17843
 

Thank you to petetheplumber for being so public spirited. 😀

What I am rather concerned about is that Swinley could so easily go the same way as the original "technical" trail at QEP. Neglected and pretty much unusable.

Rumour has it that Bracknell Forest Borough Council received £20K for allowing the film crew to use a car park. Crown Estate also got megabucks for allowing filming. When is this money going to filter through for Joe Public's benefit, not specifically mountain biking?

Don't forget that the Forest is massively popular for the local community and the play area is great for kids.

I would say that a comprehensive and well thought-out plan is needed to address the future of Swinley Forest as a recreational destination.


 
Posted : 03/05/2010 9:44 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

CG agree with that. And given some of the damage done to certain trails during the filming, don't think it is too much to ask to put a bit back to fix them up (cash that is). Else I'll have my 20 notes back! 😉


 
Posted : 03/05/2010 9:50 pm
 DT78
Posts: 10066
Free Member
 

I reckon armouring and way marking a couple of routes would do for most of the weekend warrior traffic. Leaving the rest of the trails alone.

Tbh I thought the trails held up pretty well during the race. My local trails are far worse than that after bad weather!

I'll be back to swinley in a couple of weeks or so to try to remember the route and find some of those runs, will be interested to see if they've recovered or as bad as people are suggesting.


 
Posted : 03/05/2010 10:14 pm
Posts: 17843
 

auric - definitely! £20 is currently not value for money. 🙄

Don't suppose anyone has a gpx of the route pretty please? E-mail in profile if you would be so kind.

Am intending to organise another Forum Ride sometime, also another Chilterns one too. Just got to get through this Saturday's Winchester Forum Ride with its "surprise finish". 8)


 
Posted : 03/05/2010 10:28 pm
Posts: 24778
Free Member
 

would this forum ride be with the same group / numbers that giggled so much about how bad conditions were on the last forum ride?

The Monsoon Ride - yes, it was wet, very wet in fact. But it didn't stop 40 STW'ers turning up for a great day of riding. HTH.

Playing devil's advocate. The Gorrick races will have been larger numbers of course but also will be reinvesting a proportion of the income into ongoing work and maintenance. Whereas the participants of the forum ride, in going ahead with it after the wettest winter on record will have done a degree of trashing of trails with little or no contribution to remaintaining the network.

Physician, heal thyself?


 
Posted : 03/05/2010 10:56 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

we decided not to go they call them weather forecasts we ended up at glycoriwg the sun was shining all day done the whites climb in 34 mins


 
Posted : 03/05/2010 11:02 pm
Posts: 17843
 

Going to disagree with you! Bit of a difference between 600 riders riding up to 70 miles and a group of 40 STW'ers spending half the ride nattering and fettling 😀

No comparison I would say!

Edit: There's plenty of folk off here who would gladly help with trail maintenance but they don't necessarily want to pay and become a member of the BOB club.


 
Posted : 03/05/2010 11:04 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

"but also will be reinvesting a proportion of the income into ongoing work and maintenance."

After paying for their insurance there isn’t much left over. All the forum riders had their permits. And it takes over a year to fix what gets damaged if ever.


 
Posted : 03/05/2010 11:11 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

On the Gorrick web site it claims.

"Gorrick has access to a range of distinctive established all weather race courses"

I don’t think that’s very accurate. I would never ride in any advent that would cause so much damage.


 
Posted : 03/05/2010 11:18 pm
Posts: 17843
 

pete - I believe the majority of their races are held in smaller venues that see less use.

I truly believe that a complete rethink/new plan is needed for mountain biking in Swinley Forest.


 
Posted : 03/05/2010 11:25 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

Depends what you mean by all weather. I didn't use mud tyres yesterday, and 100% of the lap was rideable at first, with tired legs I ran 2 sections, so it's all weather in that capacity, compared to (for example) Eastnor Castle where you can barely drag the bike, let alone ride it.

That's clearly the point they're making, rightly or wrongly, most people care how the trails ride, not how sustainable they are, and that's the case anywhere.

Let's be honest, it would be a lot better if no one did any mountain biking in wet weather, that's when the trails get trashed.

CG I'm sure I could retrieve the GPS track, but for a ride around Swinley, you could incorporate more singletrack and less fireroad without too much trouble, you could avoid the now boggy bits too!


 
Posted : 03/05/2010 11:28 pm
Posts: 24778
Free Member
 

As far as I can see difference is only in scale. The ethos is the same, if conditions are that bad why is it ok to continue with one organised ride but not another.

600 riders riding up to 70 miles

Might have been that many riding that far if the weather had been good (in which case what damage would have been caused?), but in the conditions there were about half that number with the majority riding no more than a couple of laps. A significant proportion of which was over fireroad or surfaced trail.


 
Posted : 03/05/2010 11:30 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

All the worst bits were definitely fireroads, most notably the first couple of miles, which I wouldn't bother to do on a social ride, as they basically serve to drag the field out a bit and add some distance, which was my point about the GPX track!


 
Posted : 03/05/2010 11:32 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

"Let's be honest, it would be a lot better if no one did any mountain biking in wet weather, that's when the trails get trashed."

Swinley can handle day to day use, but races do too much damage. It’s not what I think all weather means. It should say all weather for the first lap and if it rains crap for the next 6 weeks. But hay it’s up to you to race and for the rest..... Can’t think how to end that sentence.


 
Posted : 03/05/2010 11:35 pm
Page 1 / 2