genesis fortitude v...
 

[Closed] genesis fortitude vs high latitude geometry question

Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I know the fortitude frames are rigid specific, based on a 445 a-c length fork. Looking at the geometry for the high latitude, it is exactly the same as the fortitude with a 69.5 degree head angle and in every other respect. The only difference is the high latitude is based on, presumably, a sagged 100mm fork.

If you did pop suspension on the fortitude, decreasing the head angle by approx 1 degree, would it really make a huge difference?

I have no real intention of doing this, but am curious.


 
Posted : 26/04/2015 9:38 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Bump?


 
Posted : 27/04/2015 7:06 pm
 sv
Posts: 2815
Full Member
 

Certainly didn't lift easily on any climbs I did on it (Fortitude SS). Great bike.


 
Posted : 27/04/2015 7:11 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Do you mean you tried it and it became harder to lift the front end up? Sorry I didn't fully understand what you meant


 
Posted : 27/04/2015 8:08 pm
Posts: 3817
Full Member
 

I've got both bikes.
High Lat with a 490 rigid fork is similar to the Fortitude with a 445 fork. Longer fork on Fortitude would ruin it (for me). Not so much the head angle, more the bar height, the BB height and reduced reach from jacking up the front end.


 
Posted : 27/04/2015 8:09 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

SV I think I just understood what you meant. What forks did you try on it?


 
Posted : 27/04/2015 8:14 pm
 sv
Posts: 2815
Full Member
 

Sorry, it was standard steel forks. Yes I meant at 445 a2c the front wasn't at all light on the climbs/easily wheelied although nice and slack, similarly a2c sagged sus forks should work IMO.


 
Posted : 29/04/2015 10:55 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Bump in case anyone else has experience of the above


 
Posted : 05/05/2015 9:49 pm