Forum menu
Frame advice for a ...
 

[Closed] Frame advice for a noob -- ragley blue pig or cotic bfe?

Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

these frames are not built for light weight - light steel frames are generally zingy and comfortable, alloy ones can be, at the heavier end I don't think feel is a priority.


 
Posted : 03/12/2009 9:57 pm
Posts: 7563
Free Member
 

We chose a 32mm top tube diameter on the Pig, with an externally butted section at the head tube for strength.

38mm downtube keeps the BB Tidy.

Nice.


 
Posted : 03/12/2009 10:04 pm
 ton
Posts: 24278
Full Member
 

stop talking about blue pig's....it is making me want another one........... ๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 03/12/2009 10:10 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Still don't get it cynic-al.

If the advantage of aluminium over steel is weight and stiffness, what is the advantage of steel over aluminium?

Okay, it's probably easier to work, and the tubes can have a smaller diameter. Got that. But there must be something in it for the rider as well, even at the burly end of the market. If not comfort, then what?


 
Posted : 03/12/2009 10:16 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I reckon is a bit comfier, but when you start using thick gauge oversized stays (like a BFe or Trailstar) it definitely isnt comfy.

I guess alot of it is down to the tube profile.

Steel is just far better cos its stronger and lasts forever


 
Posted : 03/12/2009 10:18 pm
 ton
Posts: 24278
Full Member
 

steel is deffo comfier than alloy........
it can be repaired easier
it bends rather than snaps without warning.

i like steel.


 
Posted : 03/12/2009 10:19 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

So whydiddja keep the mmmmbop? ๐Ÿ˜€


 
Posted : 03/12/2009 10:27 pm
 ton
Posts: 24278
Full Member
 

cos i am a serial bike swapper....................fact.


 
Posted : 03/12/2009 10:28 pm
Posts: 513
Free Member
 

yeah tony whats the mmmbop got over the pig (and what have they both got over the 456 ?)


 
Posted : 03/12/2009 10:29 pm
Posts: 6131
Full Member
 

Steel for that little extra give,

Not read the entire thread but I doubt you'll get much "give" on either of those frames, neither is light enough (ton is in a different of folk who weight tons).

Also if you are genuine about never having been off road I'd suggest you get something similar to what your mates ride, it will take time to get confident riding and you may be better sticking with something "known"...also these bikes are heavy, you may prefer a light xc thing as your first mtb. You're not going to be pinning tabletops in your first ride etc

Gotta disagree with you there cynic-al
As I have already said I have been riding an old school Bonty for 16yrs, they do not come much more skinnier and zingier than that.
The Pig on the other hand is stiff, but a good stiff, in all the right places. My first ride was in the Peaks which is hugely different from my usual stomping ground around the Stanes and Lakes, got on with it straight away hence I had no hesitation in buying a frame there and then. I had planned to test a P7, Genesis, Charge and various other new style steel hardtails.
The pig was just ace.
Given the bling that theye is fitting to any frame he gets the Pig will be anything but heavy. I was riding with a mate the other week who rides a 26lb Heckler and he struggled to keep up ๐Ÿ˜†

In what way would a newbie have difficulty riding one? Nothing to gauge his experience on therefore should be able to ride it no problem.

As for riding in the alps I rode my first full sus bike when in Verbier. Never riden a Kona Coiler or any of the trails and managed to keep up fine ๐Ÿ˜ˆ Wieght aint everything โ—

Another reason I like the Pig is the looks. There are no add-on bits like seat/chainstay braces to prevent the frame folding, no top tube/seat tube braces to stop them parting company etc. Granted it does look a bit odd having that big girder holding the head/top and down tubes together but I prefer that to some of the other gusseting solutions that move loads to other areas where bikes break(handjobs spring to mind)


 
Posted : 03/12/2009 10:29 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

sounds wonderful.


 
Posted : 03/12/2009 10:30 pm
 ton
Posts: 24278
Full Member
 

mick, the mm bop suits my 150mm forks, and they are both a bit more refined than the 456, which is made from lead lined gaspipe......... ๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 03/12/2009 10:33 pm
Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

Fair enough trekster just going on my experience of heavier HT's.

theeye I am not convinced you've been a bike enthusiast for 15 years if you don't know the pros and cons of steel v alu.


 
Posted : 03/12/2009 10:33 pm
Posts: 513
Free Member
 

cheers tony i thought they were both rated for the same forks for some reason . its nice gaspipe tho and you knows it ๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 03/12/2009 10:35 pm
Posts: 6131
Full Member
 

Fair enough trekster just going on my experience of heavier HT's.

Cheers Al
There is no doubt that older heavy frames may not have been very efficient but I feel the Pig manages to put the power down whenever it is needed. I have been climbing hills in the middle ring that I used to drop into granny ๐Ÿ™‚
Running some cheap 130 Marz Bombers btw and a 70mm stem courtesy of a Saracen โ—
[IMG] [/IMG]

Must go and weigh mine out of curiosity ๐Ÿ˜ฏ


 
Posted : 03/12/2009 10:37 pm
 ton
Posts: 24278
Full Member
 

my new h/tail is pretty hefty........but fun...


 
Posted : 03/12/2009 10:38 pm
Posts: 7563
Free Member
 

For me, top tube diameter and section has always been key in a bike's ride. Hence the skinny top tube diameters and great rides on the early inbreds.

"squish" to me, never occured because of rear triangle design, though i could argue that the on-one welded wishbone was laterally stiffer - but vertically? stiff - sure - but stiffer than a 'normal' triangle? It's a triangle! they're triangulated in lots of planes - how can they flex???

for me, squish comes about from the wheels spreading under load. And the major defining characteristic there is top tube section.

with the blue pigs, I specced a 32mm top tube, with a thicker, flared, externally butted top tube to give the head tube area strength.

we then used a bigger than normal (38mm) downtube, to keep the frame tracking straight, add BB stiffness, and then put a box gusset to spread the load from the down tube to the top tube to help us with the tough CEN test.

result? great ride quality, but with massive headtube strength for impact and fatigue.


 
Posted : 03/12/2009 10:42 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Great spot Trekster!

Trying to decode Brant's last post... So keeping the Pig's toptube skinnier in the back allows a bit of "give", making the ride more comfortable, and the flare towards the front means that the headtube is staying attached to the frame. I think I have it.

So the steel Pig should be more comfortable than, say, an alu Stiffee, but both can rip down the mountain.
Which is what I thought, but cynic-al confused me.

cynic-al:

theeye I am not convinced you've been a bike enthusiast for 15 years if you don't know the pros and cons of steel v alu

Easy there, rider, no need to get snippy.

Enthusiast? Didn't say I was. Said I stayed on the road.
To and from work every day on my old-ass commuter, which was also my only mode of transport around London for many years. All, may I point out, on the road.


 
Posted : 03/12/2009 11:35 pm
Posts: 40432
Free Member
 

Great thread. Where else can you post asking for help deciding between two bikes and have both the designers weigh in with their opinions?

I don't have much to add, other than agreeing with the guy who dared to say you should go full-sus - and to suggest that if you're set on a steel hardtail, you might want to look at the Genesis Alpitude if you haven't already.


 
Posted : 03/12/2009 11:53 pm
Posts: 184
Free Member
 

ton - Member

stop talking about blue pig's....it is making me want another one...........

Sorry mate - you're not having your old one back - I'm enjoying it too much. ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 04/12/2009 12:20 am
Posts: 35021
Full Member
 

Chameleon.


 
Posted : 04/12/2009 12:23 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

The Chameleon is alu, no?
Sounds unforgiving...

The Alpitude is really nice, it's true... I looked at it a couple weeks ago, but discounted it for some reason, can't remember why. Probably something someone said on a forum somewhere, which of course should be taken with a grain of salt. But the Pig and BFe really had stellar reviews all the way through. Should take another look... But may not have the strength... aaaargh!

Yeah, full suspension...
My brain says full suss. My heart says hardtail. The dual suspension seems so technical and engineered and... well, vulgar, really... Probably will be sorry after, with my back in pieces, and it's a completely emotional decision, but there you go.


 
Posted : 04/12/2009 12:35 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Transition Trans Am is another to check out


 
Posted : 04/12/2009 12:42 am
Posts: 35021
Full Member
 

It's not unforgiving if you know what tyres and post and saddle. You want stiff, light, direct? Then Chameleon.


 
Posted : 04/12/2009 12:42 am
 wors
Posts: 3796
Full Member
 

i'm too pissed to relpy a proper answer but what Brant said, yeah! Its ****in great!


 
Posted : 04/12/2009 12:50 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Sounds like a Cove stiffee would be a good bet for you. Alloy frame though. But steel versus alloy for comfort is not such a big deal that people would have you believe! As said above when you start using thick tubes for long travel forks, the steel is real thing falls flat on its arse. I have had a Genesis and its not forgiving!

Or as said before a 456 offers what the others have but at a cheaper price. The stiffee offers a bit more class over BFe or Blue Pigs if you are going to spend more money IMO


 
Posted : 04/12/2009 12:50 am
Posts: 6985
Free Member
 

buy something popular on here so you can sell it easy enough when you dont ride it more than twice.


 
Posted : 04/12/2009 12:55 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Damn.
Was hoping for more clarity, but am getting more confused.

Almost bought an ex-demo stiffee a couple of weeks ago, comparable setup to what I'm thinking about for the Pig, but started thinking about steel being softer. The stiffee would have cost a grand, and to build up a new Pig I'm looking at around 1,500.

Now I'm hearing steel doesn't make much difference on bikes like these. Aaaaaaaargh!


 
Posted : 04/12/2009 1:15 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

And thanks for the advice SOOBalias! Not thinking that way now, obviously.


 
Posted : 04/12/2009 1:16 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Go back tomorrow morning and buy the Stiffee for a grand! Job done and dusted. Save 500 quid and have a far more classy bike! Ride bike and enjoy!

PS clarity is one thing you can be certain of not ascertaining on here!


 
Posted : 04/12/2009 1:24 am
Posts: 66105
Full Member
 

Theyeye wrote,

"Nope, haven't ruled it out. But I don't want to buy it just because it's cheap."

456s aren't just cheap, they're cheap and very good- they'd be worth buying at twice the price IMO. They're also a relatively middle-of-the-road, versatile frame, which is definately an advantage in your position. I'm not sure I'd buy one now but when I was still figuring out what I wanted from a mountain bike something like that would have been perfect.


 
Posted : 04/12/2009 2:38 am
Posts: 49
Free Member
 

How about getting a frame of each and trying them both if money aint a great issue? Whichever you don't like sell on the classifieds ๐Ÿ™‚

I love my Soul and am keen (when I have a secure job) to get a BFe because I love the geometry.

Definately go Hardtail though - Full Sus is great but does make you lazy.


 
Posted : 04/12/2009 8:24 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I ain't about the material per-se. It's about what the designer does with it. HT now for the skills, FS in 2 years. Everyone [b]needs[/b] two mountain bikes anyway. BTW if you're keeping up with FSers, you'll need a good fork.


 
Posted : 04/12/2009 9:14 am
Posts: 40432
Free Member
 

Anyway, whichever bike you get you'll probably love it - because you won't know any different and you'll be riding in fabulous mountain terrain.


 
Posted : 04/12/2009 11:43 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Brant -- sorry to be a pain, but I'm a bit confused with people saying that in these kinds of bikes steel doesn't have any comfort advantage over alu... If that's so, I still don't understand why anyone would buy steel.

It would be really great if you could explain in plain english what the Pig has over the mmmbop on the trail...

I understand that the mmmbop has weight, wider choice of forks with the bigger headtube (since you can throw in 1.125 as well as 1.5), and a bigger seatpost...


 
Posted : 04/12/2009 11:50 am
Posts: 7563
Free Member
 

There's a definite difference between the mmmbop and the blue pig. The sizes of steel we use build a more compliant frame with more twist and splay to it which feels softer going through stuff. The alloy frame is more precise but is harsher.


 
Posted : 04/12/2009 12:07 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

A bigger seatpost feels stiffer than a narrower one.


 
Posted : 04/12/2009 12:13 pm
Posts: 2554
Free Member
 

John you have sold your soul ๐Ÿ™

Ton - How can someone who has never spent more than 5mins on any one bike ever hope to pass comment on how a bike handles?

theyEye - Why not pass a bit more comment on what you expect the new frame to achieve. Tell us if you are wanting to progress to long distance xc riding or had 'gnarly' freeride type riding. With your current background i would have expected you to have lots of miles in your legs so surely a more xc orientated rig would suit. Are you expecting the suggestiongs of Soul/456/etc etc to fold under you or something? I am sure i have seen pictures and mention from Cy that the soul is an amazingly strong frame. Bearing in mind its made of higher spec tubing, the fact it is lighter doesnt asume that it is weeker. Unless i have missed something you have jumped from road riding to heavy duty frames, designed primarily for heavy hitting dh with the ability to climb rather than considering what you actually want from the frame. Should we start discussing what full face you want to wear around glentress etc now or should we just jump straight to spine protectors? Brant & co will spin their current line of what suits you without actually considering that one of their older designs will suit you better. Its what feeds their marketing hype.


 
Posted : 04/12/2009 12:13 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

TheLittelestHobo: Yeah, my background is road distance, but that's kind of the point -- want to do something diametrically opposite. So 'gnarly' is definitely the direction, on a full-on frame straight away 'cause I tend to buy a bike and keep it forever. I'm aiming for it to be right now, and right in 5 year's time as well. Hopefully I'll know a thing or two by then. Knowing nothing about this type of biking now may mean that I'm wrong in my choice, but so be it, just trying to take the best shot I can.

And might as well get to know the end-goal bike from the beginning. The price advantage of going with a more 'normal' frame isn't all that much anyway... The Soul, for example, is more expensive then either the Pig or the BFe.

So that's the story.

Brant: Thanks. Asking you may have been like asking the wolf to watch the sheep, but throughout my research I've come to pretty much that conclusion.

So I'm done. Blue Pig, here I come!


 
Posted : 04/12/2009 1:28 pm
Posts: 1
Free Member
 

Me thinks you should try before you buy.

I like the steeper head angle on the BFe.
More direct steering, better through singletrack.
It's also a relatively light frame for a burly HT.


 
Posted : 04/12/2009 1:44 pm
Posts: 11937
Free Member
 

There's a definite difference between the mmmbop and the blue pig.

Which one was more braaaaaaap?


 
Posted : 04/12/2009 2:19 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

old thread resurection!

Looking at the thread doing some research for what might be a blue pig purchase and wondering if theeye bought the pig.
and if it was the orange one i saw up at Sestola in the summer?

Really cant believe there would be 2 in the same area out there.


 
Posted : 05/12/2010 7:07 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

That WAS me! Madness!!!
Really happy with the pig, even if the italians all think i have a screw loose.
Wouldn't trade it for anything.

Wild guess ivan- grey five?
Do you live around here?


 
Posted : 05/12/2010 12:03 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

White 5 this year but a grey one for the previous 3 years.

I semi-live in Italy, 2 weeks there and 1 weekend back. Although that has changed this year since the baby has come and at a year still only sleeps about 4hours a night, makes it difficult to be away for more than 3 nights as the missus is back working full time.

I am working up near Carpi designing tractors, will hopefully be out there still this time next year but things are getting tighter so as the last english engineer I may get the chop at some point.

I seem to remember being on the lift from Sestola and you nearly lost it big time as you were passing underneath it, I remember thinking that taking the 5 and not the hardtail this summer was the best idea although it was about 30 days on the road to 1 day in the hills.

How long have you been out there for? I met another english guy 2 weeks ago who had been there for 27years, he owned the whitedog brewery which makes some proper beer in the hills above Modena. Have a look at the website, mega.

Have you found the cracking descent from Cimoncino down to Fanano which was part of the old percorso 1 route? (those were the only tracks when I first started going up there)

I have just added a BP to my stable of bikes so there may actually be 2 out there next year. Although nothing is better than mullering the DH guys on the more pedally routes (skinny shark etc) on the 5, quite often they like to stop for a chat to pretend they were taking it easy. Having said that the level of skill is growing every time I go up, mine is decreasing due to too much baby and flying!

Do you know of other riding out there?, I used to go upto Garda a bit and got over to Febbio a few times. Have also seen another bike park is now open in Abetone but never gone.


 
Posted : 06/12/2010 5:55 pm
Page 2 / 2