Forks:which of thes...
 

MegaSack DRAW - This year's winner is user - rgwb
We will be in touch

[Closed] Forks:which of these is the best?

15 Posts
7 Users
0 Reactions
88 Views
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

which of the following forks is the best guys, i am clueless...fox 32 f series rl 120mm or Rck Shox recon SL solo air ?

Cheers


 
Posted : 23/06/2010 5:31 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Why not wait & see what the new SID 120mms will be like?


 
Posted : 23/06/2010 5:33 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I maybe buying a Trek Ex6 or an Ex8 and they have these forks. Thats why i want to know.


 
Posted : 23/06/2010 5:42 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

By most metrics the Fox is far superior: lighter, and better damping, probably > £450 new. The RS is probably about £250 new, but is a reasonable fork, very easy to service, very reliable but lacking the finesse of the Fox.

Personally I'm a Rockshox fan (have Reba/Rev/Domain) but if you are buying a whole bike maybe there are more important considerations (price/condition?).


 
Posted : 23/06/2010 5:48 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

fox


 
Posted : 23/06/2010 5:48 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

My concern w Fox is rather unrealistic servicing intervals..Dont get me wrong I like them (I have a Talas 08) but Im switching to Rockshox..


 
Posted : 23/06/2010 5:53 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Sorry, should have said, the bike is new. What is the service interval on Fox?


 
Posted : 23/06/2010 5:58 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[url= http://service.foxracingshox.com/consumers/index.htm ]Fox tech centre[/url]


 
Posted : 23/06/2010 6:07 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Wiper seal needs a clean and re-lube every 15hrs which involves removing the lower forks legs....easy and quick (20mins) if you're not a ham-fisted ape!


 
Posted : 23/06/2010 6:09 pm
Posts: 6382
Free Member
 

20 minutes [b]if [/b] you're a hamfisted ape.

Don't understand all the fuss about this- folk lavish huge amounts of care, attention, time and materials on looking after their £15 chain, but can't be arsed spending 10-15 minutes looking after what is probably one of the most sophisticated bits of engineering on their bike.
Rockshox ask for the same service interval as well, don't they?


 
Posted : 23/06/2010 6:16 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

No Rockshox is about 50hrs & then all you have to do is look at them..literally look at them..Dont get me wrong I like Fox but with the amount of time I spend riding I want something that gives me a little bit more confidence that it isnt going to break on me..


 
Posted : 23/06/2010 6:18 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Sorry, wasn't aware it was a race!


 
Posted : 23/06/2010 6:20 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Easy boys..opinions not punch ups.


 
Posted : 23/06/2010 6:27 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Fight!


 
Posted : 23/06/2010 6:28 pm
Posts: 6382
Free Member
 

not hard for stuff to escalate round here, is it. 😳


 
Posted : 23/06/2010 6:34 pm
 tron
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Even the Fox guide is full of careful careful type stuff. I personally don't want to be chancing a £300+ pair of forks by poking a screwdriver around the stanchions pretty much every week or two.

It's not comparable to cleaning a chain - stick the chain cleaner on, hose it down, oil it. There's no risk of ruining anything expensive and I dont have to take anything apart. And the thing with a chain is that it's the best system we have at the moment for drive. With forks, you can choose to stick a set of open bath Marzocchis on and look at them once a year.

Whereas with the Fox I either go poking expensive things with a screwdriver or take the forks to bits, which means I need something to hold the bike up whilst I do that (workstand?).


 
Posted : 23/06/2010 6:35 pm