Forum search & shortcuts

engineering help pl...
 

[Closed] engineering help please ( cynic-AL-POCALYPSE content)

Posts: 41395
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#2767622]

I bought a jump frame to do this to an old Jamis HT I have lying around (thanks for the idea taki):

[url= http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4023/4641090341_94c3987844_z.jp g" target="_blank">http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4023/4641090341_94c3987844_z.jp g"/> [/img][/url]
[url= http://www.flickr.com/photos/takisawa2/4641090341/ ]21032010287[/url] by [url= http://www.flickr.com/people/takisawa2/ ]pten2106[/url], on Flickr
I aim to "build" the utility bike as above, and bolt/CF glue a humoungous rack on it (thinking old bar roof rack sawn in 2?)

My Q is how best to attach the top-tube of the rear bike to the seat post of the front. My suggestions are:

1. Drill the top tube (difficult to do accurately) and leave metal in front of the hole, possibly add a slot at the back and a bolt/nut to tighten.
2. Drill it and cut away the front (easier to get an accurate shape), leaving a bit on each side and a hole through which a jubilee clip could go to secure it.
3. Erm I had thought of 3 but I've forgotten.

Any suggestions?

[url= http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2536/5735823331_8228a984c0_z.jp g" target="_blank">http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2536/5735823331_8228a984c0_z.jp g"/> [/img][/url]
[url= [/url] by [url= http://www.flickr.com/people/7693620@N05/ ]alan cole[/url], on Flickr


 
Posted : 19/05/2011 9:06 am
Posts: 30656
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 19/05/2011 9:09 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Cant you just glue it?!! 😀


 
Posted : 19/05/2011 9:10 am
Posts: 41395
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I want it to be remove-al-able...though I did think of a CF reinforced clamp, I reckoned it might encourage the thread to co off-topic, and I am genuinely looking for ideas.


 
Posted : 19/05/2011 9:11 am
Posts: 16383
Free Member
 

Something like this:

[img] [/img]

eg [url= http://uk.rs-online.com/web/search/searchBrowseAction.html?method=browseSuperSection&N=4294962138#Steel%20Tube%20and%20Aluminium%20Structural ]http://uk.rs-online.com/web/search/searchBrowseAction.html?method=browseSuperSection&N=4294962138#Steel%20Tube%20and%20Aluminium%20Structural[/url]


 
Posted : 19/05/2011 9:14 am
Posts: 1014
Free Member
 

leave the top tube long. drill hole for the seat post. clamp both top tubes together. with jubilee clamps or similar.


 
Posted : 19/05/2011 9:15 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm not an engineer but how about modding the frame with some sort of a clamp from a kids trailer bike OR modding a clamp from a seatpost rack.
[img] http://bike-bags.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/130.jp g" target="_blank">http://bike-bags.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/130.jp g"/> [/img]

But it is not enough of a niche bodge to be considered, however always an option.


 
Posted : 19/05/2011 9:15 am
Posts: 3508
Free Member
 

Was thinking a Fork/steerer star nut type thing, but it won't help with lateral stability.

(nips off to put kettle on)


 
Posted : 19/05/2011 9:17 am
Posts: 41395
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Miezsko - this is LOOOOOOOOOW budget!

nick - ta but sorry, top tube is square!

thom - sounds good, I reckon drilling it accurately enough would be difficult to impossible with the equipment I have though.

carlos - ? Lateral stabilty will come from the BB of the rear frame being bolted into the dropouts of the front frame, so it's not a big issue I don't think.


 
Posted : 19/05/2011 9:17 am
Posts: 4202
Full Member
 

Something like this knocked up by your local machine shop?

[url= http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5143/5735847913_2a25b0afa1.jp g" target="_blank">http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5143/5735847913_2a25b0afa1.jp g"/> [/img][/url]
[url= http://www.flickr.com/photos/35894025@N02/5735847913/ ]clamp[/url] by [url= http://www.flickr.com/people/35894025@N02/ ]robbo1234biking[/url], on Flickr


 
Posted : 19/05/2011 9:18 am
Posts: 16383
Free Member
 

nick - ta but sorry, top tube is square!

Then use a square one and make a bush for the seatpost (bit of wood/plastic with a hole drilled in it)

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 19/05/2011 9:23 am
Posts: 3008
Full Member
 

[img] [/img]

Hmmm, I may even know of a machine shop 😉


 
Posted : 19/05/2011 9:23 am
Posts: 4202
Full Member
 

Modified for square!

[url= http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2743/5735860665_af0aee2615.jp g" target="_blank">http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2743/5735860665_af0aee2615.jp g"/> [/img][/url]
[url= http://www.flickr.com/photos/35894025@N02/5735860665/ ]clamp[/url] by [url= http://www.flickr.com/people/35894025@N02/ ]robbo1234biking[/url], on Flickr


 
Posted : 19/05/2011 9:26 am
Posts: 41395
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Nice but I think I'd prefer to save any machine shop favours for non-shite projects!


 
Posted : 19/05/2011 9:29 am
Posts: 4742
Full Member
 

The top tube will collapse if you try to clamp it unless you fully support it or put an insert in it, so something like has been drawn above is the way to go.


 
Posted : 19/05/2011 9:34 am
Posts: 41395
Free Member
Topic starter
 

It's a 7lb 13" jump bike, I expect the topp tube to be fairly thick!

Option 2 or something similar winning for me despite lack of support!


 
Posted : 19/05/2011 9:38 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Don't stop there Al, bolt on a third bike! 🙂


 
Posted : 19/05/2011 9:39 am
 GW
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

something like has been drawn above is the way to go.
Macmerry is the way to go 😉


 
Posted : 19/05/2011 9:39 am
Posts: 4202
Full Member
 

I dont think youll get enough clamp load like that. THe hoseclip is trying to do two things and will end up loosening and sliding up and down the seatpost.


 
Posted : 19/05/2011 9:41 am
Posts: 4742
Full Member
 

It's a 7lb 13" jump bike, I expect the topp tube to be fairly thick!

Yes but the wall thickness isn't enough on it's own. It's strong because it's a tube. (strong meaning stiff, robust and able to withstand wear.)


 
Posted : 19/05/2011 9:44 am
Posts: 41395
Free Member
Topic starter
 

But the top tube is pressing against the seatpost from behind, what other loads are there to accommodate?

EDIT - I know rich, but it would just be resisting tearing forces from the jubilee clip?


 
Posted : 19/05/2011 9:45 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

PaulGillespie - Member
Don't stop there Al, bolt on a third bike!

A real bike centipede 😉

Al if it's really LOOOOOOW budget than a piece of string is enough! what's the worst that can happen?

[STW expert mode]
For me option 1 looks stronger then option 2 and because I'm studying accountancy and have no idea about engineering it must be.
[STW expert mode]


 
Posted : 19/05/2011 9:46 am
Posts: 3008
Full Member
 

The lateral movement of you pedaling?


 
Posted : 19/05/2011 9:46 am
Posts: 4742
Full Member
 

It's drilling thro' the tube to fix the jubilee clip that concerns me. Any movement will cause the screw to wear away metal so before too long it will be a large oval shaped hole, just before it fails.
Edit. OK, I see the whole Jubilee clip passes thro, the tube, but the same applies.


 
Posted : 19/05/2011 9:50 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[url= ]Holy ......[/url]


 
Posted : 19/05/2011 9:50 am
Posts: 18
Free Member
 

I'd also be worried about the rear dropouts on the GT. You're asking them to take a load they were never designed for.


 
Posted : 19/05/2011 9:52 am
Posts: 16383
Free Member
 

How about something like a USE seatpost

Put a bar with a couple of holes in it through the top tube

[img] [/img]

Then put a u bolt around the seatpost
[img] [/img]

Stronger than a jubilee and much stiffer


 
Posted : 19/05/2011 9:56 am
Posts: 1681
Full Member
 

Any decent flapjack recipe, and bake it on.

I'm trying to work out if I'd prefer to sit at the front or the back... 😯


 
Posted : 19/05/2011 9:58 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'd also be worried about the rear dropouts on the GT. You're asking them to take a load they were never designed for.

+1

It's the joint between the dropouts and the bottom bracket that I would be worried about, can't really see how you could make that strong enough, either vertically or laterally.

Brilliant idea though and make sure you get a video of the first ride.


 
Posted : 19/05/2011 10:03 am
Posts: 7874
Free Member
 

I wouldn't pi$$ about with connectors, they'll probably shear unless you make them really chunky. I'd lash something up out of thick ally tube and/or channel picking up the two top tubes. Rotate the back bike clockwise a bit to line the top tubes up and then bodge away.

Now you've completed your POC rear disc brake mount, can we expect to see another black scab/cutlery combo on this bike? 🙂


 
Posted : 19/05/2011 10:07 am
Posts: 251
Full Member
 

one of these;

[img] [/img]

[url= http://www.winstanleysbikes.co.uk/product/39107/Adventure_Pre_2011_Trailer_Bike_Hitch ]http://www.winstanleysbikes.co.uk/product/39107/Adventure_Pre_2011_Trailer_Bike_Hitch[/url]

with a solid 6" rod of solid metal inside the cut off top tube to spread the load where the pin goes through.


 
Posted : 19/05/2011 10:07 am
Posts: 151
Free Member
 

I like it, but it lacks ambition. 😉
[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 19/05/2011 10:12 am
Posts: 2432
Full Member
 

You know, I do enjoy your postings, Al.

It's the heady combination of being quite possibly the cheapest man in Scotland coupled with a wonderful attitude that ensures you never let common sense and experience get in the way of a bad decision!

Chapeau! 😀


 
Posted : 19/05/2011 10:18 am
Posts: 41395
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I stil don't see that the upper junction is under significant stress -the only force is pushing it together.

I hadn't calcualted the forces on the dropouts (what would they do anyway?) but here goes (Using 16" chainstays and a 24" front centre):

Dropouts....designed to take the vertical load of 3/5 of a rider's bodyweight, say 100kg, i.e. 60kg - off road?

With the new weight distribution, I calculate with my 80kg, the force on the rear hub will be, 3/7 of that i.e. 36kg (+shopping etc). The force on the front dropouts i.e. dropouts will be ~72kg? Road use only? Seems OK to me.

WW not sure what you mean, no need for a pivot there.


 
Posted : 19/05/2011 10:27 am
Posts: 3508
Free Member
 

Still thinking it'll twist some under pedaling and the drop outs are designed for stuff to ..err drop out of, where as a wheel will be pushing upwards into them so that coulkd be an issue.

Cut the top tube & down tube keeping the steerer attatched and re-weld it back on allbeit a shorter inverted one that the seatpost will then simply fit through. To clamp it cut a vertical line top to bottom of the steerer and clamp with jubilies.


 
Posted : 19/05/2011 10:40 am
Posts: 41395
Free Member
Topic starter
 

carlos, draw it out and think it through rather than guess!

And I cannot weld.


 
Posted : 19/05/2011 10:45 am
Posts: 251
Full Member
 

al - not for the pivot, more a convenient way to get a bracket that would fit a seat post easily.


 
Posted : 19/05/2011 10:52 am
Posts: 3508
Free Member
 

Not a guess Al, if the inverted top tube/steerer is welded on at the same angle (it could be welded at pretty much any angle)as the seat tube I don't see why it won't work. Obviously the down tube would be trimmed right back to the steerer tube.

Maybe I'm just $h1t at explaining things, can't do pic's as no facilities at work.

Meh, but if you can't weld


 
Posted : 19/05/2011 10:57 am
Posts: 41395
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Ah I see WW.

Missed this gem:

Now you've completed your POC rear disc brake mount, can we expect to see another black scab/cutlery combo on this bike?

It's getting re done. I suspect there may well be some carbon attaching the rack to the bike for you to flame.

Oh hang on, the disc mount on my forks is still working fine 🙄

EDIT carlos, this is where you are guessing:

Still thinking it'll twist some under pedaling and the drop outs are designed for stuff to ..err drop out of, where as a wheel will be pushing upwards into them so that coulkd be an issue.

Your solution also attempts to clamp a 30mm ID tube, supported on 1/3 of it's surface by the top and down tubes, around a 27.2 tube - I presume you are thinking of a shim?


 
Posted : 19/05/2011 10:57 am
Posts: 18
Free Member
 

The rear dropouts might be OK but just imagine that the seatstays and chainstays of the rear frame are several metres longer to understand the leverage they are exerting at the dropouts. It isn't the dead weight that's the issue, it's the leverage that's roughly doubling the load. Also a wheel would be pushing upwards but this will be pushing about 45° backwards. I'm not saying they'll fail as they are, just that I'd be more concerned about this than connecting the top tube. Depends hugely on your weight, the loads you are carrying and the bumpiness of the terrain though.


 
Posted : 19/05/2011 11:04 am
Posts: 7874
Free Member
 

I'm not flaming you CA, I'm joking. You are sensitive about your lovely creations aren't you? 🙂


 
Posted : 19/05/2011 11:05 am
Posts: 41395
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Iain have a look at my calcs - if they are wrong pease let me know.

boblo, I'm doing stuff that no one else is and it's working, it just gets a bit tedious to get flamed for that alone, I don't flame folk when they are being constructive.


 
Posted : 19/05/2011 11:09 am
Posts: 39750
Free Member
 

ever ridden a tandem - that joint is under twist


 
Posted : 19/05/2011 11:28 am
Posts: 41395
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Tandems not nearly as stiff, more weight (which is pedalling) on the back too.


 
Posted : 19/05/2011 11:35 am
Posts: 91178
Free Member
 

Reinforce it sideways. Otherwise it'll fold at the dropout.


 
Posted : 19/05/2011 11:38 am
Page 1 / 2