Forum search & shortcuts

D'oh! Why did ...
 

[Closed] D'oh! Why did expect the X12 standard to be standard?

Posts: 0
Full Member
Topic starter
 
[#4211788]

Does anyone know if there is any reason why a Shimano x12 QR should not work with a Cannondale Jekyll x12 frame?

I bought a Shimano axle but on first pass the thread doesn't seem to fit the Jekyll frame. Didn't want to force it but wondered if anyone knows of a difference - or is just a case of paint overspray reducing the dia of the frame thread?

Cheers


 
Posted : 31/07/2012 9:27 am
Posts: 7984
Free Member
 

I think there are two x12 threads. The axle needs to match the frame.

A bit like how a maxle won't fit a fox fork even though they are both 15mm


 
Posted : 31/07/2012 9:29 am
Posts: 251
Full Member
 

I'd get an appropriate tap and run it through the frame to make sure it's clear.


 
Posted : 31/07/2012 9:29 am
Posts: 8859
Free Member
 

If you mean X-12?, then it's Syntace/DTSwiss.
possibly 3 companies doing their version of the 142mm x 12mm standard now, if that's what you mean?
Syntace/DTSwiss is X-12 [url= http://www.syntace.com/ ]http://www.syntace.com/[/url]
Syntace do a reasonably cheap after market axle that requires an allen key to fit. DT do a tool free axle which is expensive
[IMG] [/IMG]

Shimano also do a 142mm x12mm axle
Sram appear to also do a Maxle 142mm x 12mm axle
As I understand it (might be wrong) neither of these are 'X-12' standard, but some sort of alternative take on 142mm x 12mm.


 
Posted : 31/07/2012 10:42 am
Posts: 8859
Free Member
 

This is from the Jekyll specs:
Extras
High Pressure Shock Pump, DYAD Remote Lever, Syntace X-12 142 mm rear axle.

So, if you haven't got one, you need to find a Syntace X-12 axle or a DTSwiss X-12 axle (as pictured above).


 
Posted : 31/07/2012 10:51 am
Posts: 8859
Free Member
 

looks like DT do a cheaper option now the standard has become more common
[url= http://www.chainreactioncycles.com/Models.aspx?ModelID=81163&gclid=COqA2IbVw7ECFbMJtAodYRoAxA ]http://www.chainreactioncycles.com/Models.aspx?ModelID=81163&gclid=COqA2IbVw7ECFbMJtAodYRoAxA[/url]


 
Posted : 31/07/2012 11:07 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The "standard" is the dropout spacing and the diameter of the axle. How it secures to the frame varies. Axle needs to match frame, but actual hubs are interchangeable.


 
Posted : 31/07/2012 11:23 am
Posts: 251
Full Member
 

[i]How it secures to the frame varies.[/i]

What is it about the bike industry and standards?

Publishing the technical specs of a proprietary (sp?) system does not make it a bloody standard!


 
Posted : 31/07/2012 5:00 pm
Posts: 21655
Full Member
 

That's the best thing about standards; there's so many to choose from.


 
Posted : 31/07/2012 7:00 pm
Posts: 251
Full Member
 

[i]there's so many to choose from. [/i]

and even then theyseem to feel the need to produce a new one.

FSA now produce a double sided A3 poster for headset standards.

It can't be good for sustainability etc when every manufacturer is off doing their own thing and producing bespoke components.


 
Posted : 31/07/2012 7:02 pm