Forum search & shortcuts

Ditching the lycra ...
 

UPDATE: Reviews section refreshed, redesigned, searchable: Go take a look

Ditching the lycra ... Well at least off-road ...

Posts: 4927
Full Member
Topic starter
 
[#13536041]

Probably coming up to ten years ago I forewent the baggies in favour of all out MAMIL.

There are now very few rides where I won't have bibs on (shorts or tights) and a lycra jersey etc.

I'm comfortable physically and aesthetically (ooh er Mrs) in lycra and just roll with there is no hiding.

Perhaps it's one too many Radavist articles but I'm thinking of ditching the lycra for off road and embracing a less restrictive approach to on bike clothing. I won't be taking a pair of scissors to any 501s though.

For road riding the lycra will stay.

Anyone ditched the lycra in such an instance and if so, what did you end up with?

 


 
Posted : 23/06/2026 11:53 am
Posts: 1499
Full Member
 

Whatever works for you. I find lycra more comfortable and prefer it overall especially in spring/summer. I do wear baggies sometimes though, family rides, some MTB group rides


 
Posted : 23/06/2026 11:58 am
lunge reacted
Posts: 15123
Full Member
 

Never have and never will wear lycra to ride a bicycle*

*apart from undershorts


 
Posted : 23/06/2026 12:05 pm
blokeuptheroad, Tracey, citizenlee and 1 people reacted
Posts: 890
Free Member
 

I could ditch the Lycra bib shorts and top for a pair of baggies and one of those long sleeve tops with no pockets but I couldn’t ditch the aero socks. No point giving up free speed. 


 
Posted : 23/06/2026 12:10 pm
jameso reacted
Posts: 3254
Full Member
 

I wear bib shorts even if im doing uplift days. They are just hidden under other stuff....!?!

You know it is possible to simultaneously be comfortable, and look cool in enduro pyjamas...


 
Posted : 23/06/2026 12:14 pm
nickc reacted
Posts: 9237
Full Member
 

The easiest way to quit lycra is to never start.


 
Posted : 23/06/2026 12:16 pm
blokeuptheroad, kernowgaz, Tracey and 1 people reacted
Posts: 9790
Free Member
 

Loosen your clothing and your attitude may follow ..

I don't wear lycra on the road either anymore. I think the final straw was the long tight aero sleeves trend. Just, no : ) Seems like there's an acceptable costume for going out for a leisure road ride yet most of us don't race, don't even ride in a road club. 

I have a few pairs of simple shorts (Giro, Cafe du Cycliste, Kalf), some looser or MTB style single colour LS tops, tech and merino Ts and LS shirts like the older Shimano Transit or Alpkit Woodsmoke. I swear by the Transit shirt for riding in the heat, beats trad roadie tops for sure. More comfortable overall ime.

Anecdotaly I'd say road riding is a calmer experience in the last 10 years that I've not been dressed as a MAMIL / wannabe Brad Wiggins or whatever non-cyclists think. No evidence but perhaps not looking like that stereotype roadie triggers the worst drivers less. 


 
Posted : 23/06/2026 12:18 pm
milan b. reacted
Posts: 8832
Full Member
 

MTB I'll always wear baggies over bib shorts, gravel it depends how much road there is and if the off-road is likely to be overgrown in places. Prefer ones like Rapha Trail Light and a similar Gore model (both from Sport Pursuit).

Tops I struggle a bit ditching lycra options so I can look a bit of a tit with baggy bottoms and a tight jersey, I don't really like flappy material though and a lot of MTB stuff lacks pockets.

Road I'm always just bibs and lycra top and try not to look in a mirror much


 
Posted : 23/06/2026 12:43 pm
Posts: 15575
Free Member
 

I'm Baggies on the MTB, Full MAMIL on Road and Gravel, Some seem to prefer the Lumberjack shirts and 'fitted' shorts look for Gravel bikes I've noticed, but I kind of feel like if you're going to embrace the curly bars you might as well just use the same kit you do for Road riding. 

Baggies on the MTB suit the way you tend to move about more on the bike (IME/IMO). 

Ultimately you can wear what you like, part of being comfortable and enjoying a ride is liking what you're wearing and if that means adopting a bit of a uniform to appear less conspicuous to strangers then I don't see the harm. 


 
Posted : 23/06/2026 1:09 pm
Posts: 891
Full Member
 

Thankfully nowadays we don't have to wear a lycra uniform, there are MTB clothes that are not far from "normal" clothes. Same as off the bike I wear trousers (even in summer, to keep off the ticks, brambles etc), a long sleeve top and a check shirt with trainer-like shoes. 


 
Posted : 23/06/2026 1:11 pm
Posts: 4577
Full Member
 

Functionally lycra is better whatever you are riding . It's comfortable and doesn't get in the way. Baggies are extra weight, extra friction, and more likely to get caught on undergrowth and saddles - no positives apart from the looks - and you still have to wear lycra underneath them unless you are particularly fond of chafing. 


 
Posted : 23/06/2026 2:14 pm
garethjw, Ogg and lunge reacted
Posts: 18172
Full Member
 

MAMIL (or rather OMIL) on road. Off road I keep the bibs and base layer with baggies over and loose fitting top.


 
Posted : 23/06/2026 2:19 pm
Posts: 15123
Full Member
 

Posted by: onewheelgood

and you still have to wear lycra underneath them unless you are particularly fond of chafing. 

I just wear a pair of SAXX boxers from Go outdoors


 
Posted : 23/06/2026 2:19 pm
Posts: 13612
Full Member
 

Posted by: onewheelgood

Functionally lycra is better whatever you are riding . It's comfortable and doesn't get in the way. Baggies are extra weight, extra friction, and more likely to get caught on undergrowth and saddles - no positives apart from the looks - and you still have to wear lycra underneath them unless you are particularly fond of chafing. 

This is my view, Lycra just works better. I know it's not a look for everyone, but from a functional perspective it works. If you don't want to wear it due to how it looks that's fine, just don't pretend it's for a functional reason. 

 


 
Posted : 23/06/2026 2:21 pm
scotroutes reacted
Posts: 3759
Full Member
 

Posted by: onewheelgood

Functionally, a thong is better whatever you're riding. It's comfortable and doesn't get in the way. Lycra is extra weight, extra friction, and more likely to get caught on your mangina - no positives apart from the looks - and you still have to lube your taint unless you're particularly fond of chafing.

 


 
Posted : 23/06/2026 2:36 pm
Posts: 9790
Free Member
 

Posted by: onewheelgood

Functionally lycra is better whatever you are riding . It's comfortable and doesn't get in the way. Baggies are extra weight, extra friction, and more likely to get caught on undergrowth and saddles - no positives apart from the looks - and you still have to wear lycra underneath them unless you are particularly fond of chafing. 

Disagree.. fwiw. Padded lycra shorts can be the cause of discomfort on longer rides and .. extra weight or getting snagged? They're not flares : ) 

You don't need the padded shorts under normal shorts, you just need a saddle that suits you and shorts + boxers that aren't cotton and don't have bad seams. They can breathe and vent better than padded shorts. A bit of chammy cream can help on a long ride like it does with pads, and I'd say the cream makes far more difference than any pads do. 

I mean, wear what you like - as always. But I don't think it's a good thing to perpetuate this myth that you have to wear lycra to ride, or that finding a decent combo of shorts and boxers is any different or less possible to finding padded shorts that work for you (apart from a fair bit cheaper).

 

just don't pretend it's for a functional reason. 

Except it is. My experience of long-distance riding says that a pad in shorts is what starts some of the discomforts on longer rides. Padding is for your saddle, let your skin breathe more.  Certainly I don't care much for the lycra look but I did it for years, can't say I ever liked it, I just did it because I was told it was necessary (lycra is one of the reasons more people don't cycle, imo).


 
Posted : 23/06/2026 2:51 pm
Posts: 1499
Full Member
 

Posted by: onewheelgood

no positives apart from the looks

Disagree, MTB clothing looks terrible as well


 
Posted : 23/06/2026 3:58 pm
Posts: 44152
Full Member
 

If anything, I'm heading back the other way, with lycra for all off-road, not just gravel. 


 
Posted : 23/06/2026 4:22 pm
Posts: 1010
Full Member
 

Posted by: jameso

wear what you like

😎

https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2026/jun/16/naked-cycling-ever-acceptable-rental-bike-nude

 

 

 

 


 
Posted : 23/06/2026 4:39 pm
Posts: 9790
Free Member
 

^ Skids are for kids .. 


 
Posted : 23/06/2026 4:43 pm
garethjw, roger_mellie, aide and 2 people reacted
Posts: 11599
Full Member
 

Posted by: jameso

I mean, wear what you like - as always. But I don't think it's a good thing to perpetuate this myth that you have to wear lycra to ride, or that finding a decent combo of shorts and boxers is any different or less possible to finding padded shorts that work for you (apart from a fair bit cheaper).

Which boxers don't have 'bad seams'?


 
Posted : 23/06/2026 4:53 pm
Posts: 11599
Full Member
 

Posted by: chambord

Disagree, MTB clothing looks terrible as well

It depends on the mtb clothing. Some of it just looks like regular 'clothing'. It's a bit like saying 'clothing looks terrible as well'. The contemporary middle-aged, slightly pudgy mountain biker looks pretty bad in anything. ymmv.


 
Posted : 23/06/2026 4:56 pm
Posts: 3759
Full Member
 

Posted by: BadlyWiredDog

Posted by: jameso

I mean, wear what you like - as always. But I don't think it's a good thing to perpetuate this myth that you have to wear lycra to ride, or that finding a decent combo of shorts and boxers is any different or less possible to finding padded shorts that work for you (apart from a fair bit cheaper).

Which boxers don't have 'bad seams'?

I've found the Zoo York pack of 5 from TK Maxx surprisingly good. 

There is also those pricey 7Mesh padded boxers and the lady equivalent. 

 


 
Posted : 23/06/2026 4:57 pm
Posts: 11599
Full Member
 

Posted by: relapsed_mandalorian

I've found the Zoo York pack of 5 from TK Maxx surprisingly good. 

There is also those pricey 7Mesh padded boxers and the lady equivalent. 

Thanks. I'm generally a convinced chamois user, but for aimless potters during hot spells, I'd happily wear something cooler. 


 
Posted : 24/06/2026 8:15 am
Posts: 15123
Full Member
 

These are the ones I use - SAXX Kinetic

 

image.png

image.png


 
Posted : 24/06/2026 8:33 am
Posts: 9823
Full Member
 

I always use bibs and technical base. Gravel or MTB I'll have baggies on the top and a slightly looser fitting road top. Road then it's road gear.


 
Posted : 24/06/2026 8:47 am
Posts: 4939
Full Member
 

I'm with STR - decent sports boxers where the seam is not in the middle.

A squidgy pad is unneccesary on a MTB with 2.5 inches of air filled tyres and possibly 4-7 inches of suspension. 

Shorts and tshirt in slightly stretchy, breathable material, bike specific ones means they are cut longer at the rear and possibly with the shoulders a bit forward.

If I really cared about performance especially in this hot weather - and cared nothing about my appearance - tri-suits might appeal.


 
Posted : 24/06/2026 9:21 am
Posts: 11599
Full Member
 

Posted by: TheArtistFormerlyKnownAsSTR

These are the ones I use - SAXX Kinetic

 

image.png

image.png

I actually have some Saxx ones - freebies - sat in a drawer somewhere, maybe two pairs. I should ferret them out for a try. Thanks. 

 


 
Posted : 24/06/2026 12:29 pm
Posts: 11599
Full Member
 

Posted by: ayjaydoubleyou

A squidgy pad is unneccesary on a MTB with 2.5 inches of air filled tyres and possibly 4-7 inches of suspension.

I guess the argument is that the pad isn't so much cushioning your interface with ground - at least under riding conditions - as minimising pressure/friction between your undercarriage and the saddle. Sure, some of that will be reduced slightly by having a bunch of cushion between bike and ground, but you will still be the same force acting downwards to an extent. Plus bike and saddle fit / suitability are also going to have a say. 


 
Posted : 24/06/2026 12:34 pm
Posts: 63
Full Member
 

Anyone else experience "penis trap" when wearing baggies?

I prefer snug lycra to hold everything in roughly the correct place. This is ruined when wearing baggies over the lycra: there always seems to be an occasion on the ride where my bell-end gets trapped by the rigid material of the baggies. I've tried snugger baggies, and looser baggies. Still happens... my tally-wacker gets nipped. 

I only wear baggies as an extra layer of protection when pushing it a bit. At all other times it's just lycra and a comfortable willy for me 🙂


 
Posted : 24/06/2026 1:07 pm
Posts: 17499
Full Member
 

The GRVL bib shorts have a lightweight slim outer attached and are my goto for gravel riding, Gore used to do something similar. No belts, no need to hike up the waistband etc. no pockets mind you. 


 
Posted : 24/06/2026 8:26 pm
Posts: 3330
Full Member
 

I've now ditched padded shorts for all mtb rides, I've got seamless bamboo ones for relatively cheap and I wear them with baggies. I'm heading that way for more recreational gravel biking but being slightly tilted forwards makes it a bit less comfortable. My preference is to more fitted baggy shorts anyway so they don't tend to get caught on the saddle nose.

Road and fast gravel I will go for lycra and padding but that's as much for the aero gainz.


 
Posted : 24/06/2026 9:15 pm
Posts: 3330
Full Member
 

Posted by: Samadhi

Anyone else experience "penis trap" when wearing baggies?

I prefer snug lycra to hold everything in roughly the correct place. This is ruined when wearing baggies over the lycra: there always seems to be an occasion on the ride where my bell-end gets trapped by the rigid material of the baggies. I've tried snugger baggies, and looser baggies. Still happens... my tally-wacker gets nipped. 

I only wear baggies as an extra layer of protection when pushing it a bit. At all other times it's just lycra and a comfortable willy for me 🙂

No but I have to be careful it doesn't get caught in the chainring.

 


 
Posted : 24/06/2026 9:17 pm
Posts: 4939
Full Member
 

No but I have to be careful it doesn't get caught in the chainring.

if mine scrapes on a technical trail feature does it count as a dab?


 
Posted : 24/06/2026 10:23 pm
Posts: 46652
Full Member
 

Posted by: chambord

Disagree, MTB clothing looks terrible as well

I think a fair bit does look rather 'unique'.

I think personal choice plays a lot in this view. 

But around that venn diagram I have found a few brands and pieces that are OK. Usually without logos or hugely random bright patterns.

 


 
Posted : 25/06/2026 6:16 am
Posts: 7976
Full Member
 

I never wear Lycra, chamois anything like that. On road or off. Admittedly I don’t ride on road much. I don’t get chafing wearing ordinary baggies - Dharco or Endura - and my normal underwear.


 
Posted : 25/06/2026 8:21 am
tractionman reacted
Posts: 4577
Full Member
 

Shortly after I bought my first mountain bike (1989) I entered the Birmingham to Oxford charity ride. The day after, I was in the bike shop asking about a new saddle. They said no, you don't need a saddle, you need some proper cycling shorts. Since then, I have worn proper cycling shorts and I have never had any issues - or needed chamois cream.


 
Posted : 25/06/2026 9:32 am
Posts: 9790
Free Member
 

The day after, I was in the bike shop asking about a new saddle. They said no, you don't need a saddle, you need some proper cycling shorts. 

Would I rather be on a 12hr ride with the right saddle and no padded shorts, or the wrong saddle with padded shorts?

100% the former ime. No shorts can make up for a saddle that is the wrong shape or width, but the right saddle can be used w/o padded shorts. Just my experience though and that's likely to be related to the type of discomfort I get (or used to get). 

The main thing is it all works for you of course, saddle/short discomfort is caused by different things for different people (pressure, heat, chafing, a combo of two / all, etc)

 


 
Posted : 25/06/2026 10:11 am
Posts: 9347
Free Member
 

I recently had a brief spell of wearing lycra shorts on road but didn't find a great benefit and felt like a tit basically riding around in tight pants. Also the pad makes it feel like I'm wearing a big nappy. Could just be that my cheap Halfords padded shorts are rubbish though, the pad barely reaches my sit bone area but if I go the next size up they'll be loose around the waist. As a result I'm basically riding around on about 1mm of lycra between my sit bones and saddle.

I currently ride everything in bamboo boxers with fairly flat/smooth seams, and normal "outdoorsy" material shorts that aren't too baggy or long (Dare2B). It's fine for a couple of hours but wouldn't mind trying something with some light padding, maybe the Alpkit undershorts would be a good place to start!


 
Posted : 02/07/2026 4:28 pm
Posts: 1245
Full Member
 

I've recently taken to just getting on the bike and riding. whatever I'm in I ride in. jeans and t-shirt - small rucksack.  If I can be bothered to chuck on a jersey that's in the shed - stuff that's in the small rucksack goes in back pockets.  Sure, my arse hurts a bit more than usual, I sweat a bit more...but I'm out and on the bike. No faffing looking for the shorts I want etc.

That's how I rode when I was 12 and that's when cycling was the most fun 🙂


 
Posted : 03/07/2026 12:41 pm
Posts: 958
Full Member
 

When commuting and for rides under 20 miles I just wear Decathlons own brand breathable boxers under my shorts / trousers. 

For longer rides I now always wear bibs with sewn in baggy outer (Sports Pursuit currently have Silvini ones on offer). I can wear these for 80+ mile rides without issue. 


 
Posted : 04/07/2026 11:19 am