Forum search & shortcuts

cynic-al's &qu...
 

[Closed] cynic-al's "oh no, we've run out of ideas, what can we sell now" award thread

 LoCo
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Jameso have you got a link to the Liteville different size wheel bikes please not on their website.


 
Posted : 05/09/2013 9:26 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

can i nominate 10speed?* - 8 and 9 were getting a bit over the top.

(and obviously 11speed)

also, 15mm axles.

i've been saying this for years: bikes, as an engineering problem, have been solved.


 
Posted : 05/09/2013 9:32 am
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Was there not a wee trend a few years back for 24/26" wheels? Seem to recall Spesh did it with the bighit?


 
Posted : 05/09/2013 9:32 am
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

Was there not a wee trend a few years back for 24/26" wheels? Seem to recall Spesh did it with the bighit?

Cannondale did it years before that.


 
Posted : 05/09/2013 9:33 am
 LoCo
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

My current FS bike bike is a 26" frame with 29er front and 650 rear 😉

quite liked the old bighit I had briefly, as long as there were no large holes around 😆


 
Posted : 05/09/2013 9:37 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Aracer, I must be thick, what is the similarly / IP you are referring to?

The Campag chainset I pictured or are you referring to something else I mentioned?

I'm surprised they're making such a big deal. My FSA K-Force cranks are 620g including rings and BB.

Is that real or quoted weight? Shimano (and Campag) do at least normally provide accurate claimed weights - FSA are notorious for being "optimistic". Good point mind you, the Campag Record pictured above is 670g all in, a SR titanium one 630g, so they're crowing about all this high tech allowing them to get close to the competition!

More lazy and feeble journalism.

Is it not just BR cutting and pasting Shimano marketing guff (though that of course is the very definition of lazy journalism)? I suppose I would actually expect better of Shimano marketing department though. The real sign that it's BS though is the mention of the strength of pro riders, when it's actually overweight biffers who put more force through their drivetrain.


 
Posted : 05/09/2013 9:39 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

29'ers tend to be ridden by middle-aged males, 'looking for something' (in their lives).

I know a few juniors (who'd thrash almost anybody on here on a mountain bike, up or down) who ride them - should I tell them they've got it all wrong?


 
Posted : 05/09/2013 9:44 am
 hora
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

This came up last time I said it- the majority of 29'er riders ARE middle aged.

aracer - they'd thrash us on 24" probably too. Before the cumulative effect of alcohol, bacon and the onset of fear all of us were faster.

I take it you own a 29'er and are middle-aged hence the rise? 😉


 
Posted : 05/09/2013 9:49 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Before the cumulative effect of alcohol, bacon and the onset of fear all of us were faster.

OK maybe I should have said they'd have thrashed most people on here on a mountain bike (up or down) when we were at our peaks. Oh and I almost forgot I also "know" (well she has coached mini-aracer on a bike and I've ridden with her a few times) somebody who beats the best in the world on the downs on a 29er.

I take it you own a 29'er and are middle-aged hence the rise?

Well yes, but given it's a unicycle (which teenagers appear to think is cool) that probably discounts both parts.


 
Posted : 05/09/2013 9:57 am
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

29'ers tend to be ridden by middle-aged males, 'looking for something' (in their lives).

What about serial swappers of frames that are too small?
Some folk like 29 ers what is the point calling them names?
Says more about you than them IMHO

That saddle is a solution to a problem that doe snot exist


 
Posted : 05/09/2013 9:58 am
 hora
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

What about serial swappers of frames that are too small?
Who says they are too small? I don't. I own one bike. Do you have a solution where I can own 3+ bikes like everyone else on STW?

Some folk like 29 ers what is the point calling them names?
Its observational.

Says more about you than them IMHO
I've no idea what you are on about.

aracer
They could beat all of us in our prime? Possibly. I know a couple of blokes who SHOULD be top drivers/top of their field but never had the parents/money/time behind them. My point is when you have realised talent you can beat an average Joe on basically anything within reason.

The '29'er can do it in this' argument gets my back up. I don't like seeing a manu/mag/paid rider extolling the virtues of [i]spending money[/i].


 
Posted : 05/09/2013 10:00 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Anything "enduro specific".


 
Posted : 05/09/2013 10:09 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

can i nominate 10speed?* - 8 and 9 were getting a bit over the top.

(and obviously 11speed)

I've seen the Shimano 14-speed patents.

It's the classic maturing market problem. When no-one had MTBs, the job was to convince people that MTBs were cool and hip and happening. Now most people who want MTBs have them, the job is to convince them that the MTBs they have are rubbish and they need a new one.


 
Posted : 05/09/2013 10:15 am
 hora
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

On a basic level -I saw an ad on STW 'new knuckle-box system with weapons-grade aluminium'.

Jesus wept its a single pivot alu frame.


 
Posted : 05/09/2013 10:20 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

My point is when you have realised talent you can beat an average Joe on basically anything within reason.

Yes, but my point is that as extremely good riders racing at the sharp end they [b]choose[/b] to ride 29ers.

I'll join in with the rest of you at being rude about [s]marketing men's wet dream[/s] 27" bikes, but despite not owning a bike with 29" wheels myself you're all wrong about those not having any useful purpose.


 
Posted : 05/09/2013 10:24 am
Posts: 715
Free Member
 

The 29er specific saddle is an absolute joke.

The prolonged hot weather we are having has gotten to people's heads; Where is Radio Raheem busting out 'Fight The Power' when you need him?


 
Posted : 05/09/2013 10:28 am
Posts: 803
Free Member
 

Yes, but my point is that as extremely good riders racing at the sharp end they choose to ride 29ers.

except at the WCDH 😆


 
Posted : 05/09/2013 10:38 am
Posts: 43969
Full Member
 

So - that Rapha jacket...

Warm and lightweight [b]down[/b] jacket for cyclists

Warm, lightweight jacket [b]using PrimaLoft® ONE[/b] insulation


 
Posted : 05/09/2013 10:43 am
 hora
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

at the sharp end they choose to ride 29ers.
Again at risk of making a sweeping generalisation, are you talking for all pro riders here? Pro riders are paid.

Yes it'd impact on their performance if they rode the wrong bike but I wonder in history how many pro riders were PAID to ride bikes they really didn't like?


 
Posted : 05/09/2013 10:50 am
Posts: 9238
Free Member
 

Is that real or quoted weight? Shimano (and Campag) do at least normally provide accurate claimed weights - FSA are notorious for being "optimistic".

That's weighed on my (probably not totally accurate but not THAT inaccurate) kitchen scales. I went a bit special when I was building my Chinese carbon bike and weighed everything until I got to the cables and outers and bar tape then I gave up.


 
Posted : 05/09/2013 11:05 am
Posts: 9616
Free Member
 

loco, just a picture I took at Eurobike sorry, filed in the Eurobollocks section )

(not saying the bikes won't ride ok and liteville / syntace generally get a big thumbs-up for good kit)


 
Posted : 05/09/2013 11:11 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Again at risk of making a sweeping generalisation, are you talking for all pro riders here? Pro riders are paid.

Er, did you miss the bit in my original comment about these riders where I referred to them as juniors?


 
Posted : 05/09/2013 11:14 am
Posts: 9616
Free Member
 

I know I've said it before but 29'ers tend to be ridden by middle-aged males, 'looking for something' (in their lives).

I'm looking for something, aren't we all? but I doubt my wheel choice expresses it )

'projectionism'?


 
Posted : 05/09/2013 11:15 am
Posts: 40432
Free Member
 

I was gonna nominate Liteville for their odd-wheel-size bikes.

Why carry one spare inner tube on a ride when you can carry two?

Apparently there's a new trend (or marketing push) in the US for "gravel road" bikes. I suppose "fire road mincers" doesnt sound so intrepid...
[url= http://www.bikeradar.com/mtb/gear/article/trail-tech-defining-the-gravel-race-bike-37582/ ]
http://www.bikeradar.com/mtb/gear/article/trail-tech-defining-the-gravel-race-bike-37582/ [/url]


 
Posted : 05/09/2013 11:22 am
Posts: 3384
Free Member
 

loco, just a picture I took at Eurobike sorry, filed in the Eurobollocks section )

(not saying the bikes won't ride ok and liteville / syntace generally get a big thumbs-up for good kit)

Madelk (liteville distributors in ireland) have some stuff on their facebook page about it and piccies too.


 
Posted : 05/09/2013 11:26 am
Posts: 551
Free Member
 

i've been saying this for years: bikes, as an engineering problem, have been solved.

+1
apart from 2 glaring omissions.....
Gearboxes
long travel single crown inverted forks (although X-fusion have a nice looking prototype)

after this bike companies - your work is done.
So no more hollow, 29in saddles please as I have enough already.


 
Posted : 05/09/2013 11:31 am
Posts: 66127
Full Member
 

mudsoul - Member

Anything "enduro specific".

That does nark me... Half the reason enduro is so popular is that it's just the sort of riding lots of people want to do, on the bikes we already own. "Rnduro specific" is just a prick's way of saying "Normal stuff for normal riding"


 
Posted : 05/09/2013 11:32 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Companies trying to improve products to increase profits shocker...struggling to understand why this is so difficult for everyone to comprehend, regardless of wheel size or any other innovation (even a .000001% increase is an improvement)...no one is forcing you to buy it

Also...unlikely a marketing bod is going to say 'Well it does make a difference but not a lot'

Wake up a smell the roses chaps...if someone wants to but it all then let them crack on it is their money


 
Posted : 05/09/2013 11:36 am
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

.no one is forcing you to buy it

Are you new here?

Can I have an orange 5 26 er please?


 
Posted : 05/09/2013 11:38 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I must admit to having a little chuckle at this thread; if anyone wanted to know what to sell to middle aged men, this site would be an ideal starting point. From kitchen knives, coffee makers, coffee, beer, shoes, wellies, and on into the minutiae of bicycle design, it's a bloody gold mine.

To then sit and read folk criticising the latest attempts to sell you stuff is ironic in the extreme.

Basically, this is a monster we/you've created; it's not aimed at people buying cheap bikes from Halfords or a supermarket, it's all for you. 🙂


 
Posted : 05/09/2013 11:53 am
Posts: 6834
Full Member
 

Can I have an orange 5 26 er please?

Yep, Drakes Cycles in Leeds have a few in, they're even discounted. 😉

http://www.drakescycles.co.uk/m1b114s1p3511/ORANGE_Five_Pro_Kashima_-_Neon_Orange_%282013%29


 
Posted : 05/09/2013 11:53 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Posts: 9238
Free Member
 

Apparently there's a new trend (or marketing push) in the US for "gravel road" bikes. I suppose "fire road mincers" doesnt sound so intrepid...

Basically it's a cross bike. Or a road bike with bigger tyres.

The result - according to a growing number of companies - is that it is once again time to increase the clamp diameter to bolster the interface between the stem and our rangy handlebars

Something is making me think the industry is just looking for new and increasingly desperate ways to part us with our cash. I'm cynical by nature though


 
Posted : 05/09/2013 12:24 pm
Posts: 27
Free Member
 

there's a new trend (or marketing push) in the US for "gravel road" bikes

isn't there a race series in the US for gravel road bikes?
is the UK equivalent 'bridleway bikes' or 'fire road bikes'?
I thought that's what 29ers were for?

the industry is just looking for new and increasingly desperate ways to part us with our cash. I'm cynical by nature though

that's not cynicism, that's stone cold fact.


 
Posted : 05/09/2013 12:45 pm
Posts: 40432
Free Member
 

Basically it's a cross bike. Or a road bike with bigger tyres.

No, they couldn't possibly work. People need to buy another new bike instead.

35mm Bars

Yes, I thought Easton had quietly dropped this daftness but then in the Eurobike pics there's loads of them.

🙄


 
Posted : 05/09/2013 12:50 pm
Posts: 8841
Full Member
 

is the UK equivalent 'bridleway bikes' or 'fire road bikes'?

As an aside, I don't know where the idea that bridleways are all unchallenging comes from...


 
Posted : 05/09/2013 12:55 pm
Posts: 40432
Free Member
 

I don't know where the idea that bridleways are all unchallenging comes from

Neither do I, because nobody said that.


 
Posted : 05/09/2013 1:03 pm
Posts: 1754
Full Member
 

Cheered my lunch break up no-end

Maybe we should run a STW betting syndicate on what the next big thing will be?

I must admit - i didn't see 650bollox coming

11 speed was inevitable

35mm handlebar - WTF?

How about a 'extendible stem' - a bit like a dropper post, but it gets longer to climb and shorter whilst descending?

Folding handlebars, so when everyone is running 1050mm wide bars, you can get between the trees?

Left sided powertrains - I bet Shimano are cooking that one up to take on Sram and their fat/thin chainrings!!

What else is in the pipeline???


 
Posted : 05/09/2013 1:09 pm
Posts: 9616
Free Member
 

Apparently there's a new trend (or marketing push) in the US for "gravel road" bikes. I suppose "fire road mincers" doesnt sound so intrepid...
There's fire-road mincing and there's US 300-miler endurance style gravel road riding. Fast bunch racing on 32Cs on loose gravel anyone? 'Gravel bikes' are something I can see a point in, the marketing side of it is that it's got popular and the products are getting more refined. imo a road bike with room for 38-42C makes more sense for a lot of us than a 'race' bike limited to 25C. Most of us don't ride gravel or race..

Basically it's a cross bike. Or a road bike with bigger tyres.
sort of, but in the middle - like the difference between an 'XC' hardtail and a 'trail' HT? Could be same thing but some would say it's an important distinction. CX bikes BB's are too high anyway.


 
Posted : 05/09/2013 1:11 pm
Posts: 40432
Free Member
 

OK so I may have been overly critical.

The way I heard about it (via The Spokesmen podcast) was that bike companies were pushing the bikes for recreational rides on unpaved roads.


 
Posted : 05/09/2013 1:41 pm
Posts: 9238
Free Member
 

Well that's definitely what they're pushing. The number of people who can do long endurance races is tiny compared to the cost of developing the bikes.


 
Posted : 05/09/2013 2:05 pm
Posts: 21002
 

Can I have an orange 5 26 er please?

If you really wanted one, you'd have bought it by now/before they were discontinued.


 
Posted : 05/09/2013 2:17 pm
Posts: 43969
Full Member
 

[quote=chakaping ]OK so I may have been overly critical.
The way I heard about it (via The Spokesmen podcast) was that bike companies were pushing the bikes for recreational rides on unpaved roads.
A bit like CX bikes over here then?


 
Posted : 05/09/2013 2:17 pm
 hora
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Can I have a product that has 'on the fly' adjustment?

This way I can feel like I've been pimped by a 70's style woman-beater.


 
Posted : 05/09/2013 2:19 pm
Posts: 9616
Free Member
 

Atlaz, I think what they're doing is promoting bikes under acceptably 'racy' or cool imagery for people to take notice, then people think ooh, a bike for pootling on traffic-free roads.. nice. Blame minimal attention spans or background noise, I don't know.

I must admit to having a little chuckle at this thread; if anyone wanted to know what to sell to middle aged men, this site would be an ideal starting point. From kitchen knives, coffee makers, coffee, beer, shoes, wellies, and on into the minutiae of bicycle design, it's a bloody gold mine.

To then sit and read folk criticising the latest attempts to sell you stuff is ironic in the extreme.


Likewise maybe, there's fresh goods friday and there's all the interest in what's new for 2014, and there's 'why change anything' or 'it's all marketing' and the ideal is somewhere in between. Except no consumers or brands will ever settle on agreeing to only promote new stuff that's passed some kind of 'totally-needed and relevant' test via consumer group.. they can't win, it's a new-shit rat race or it's a world of steady evolution and innovation, you decide.. 90% of mountain bikes are a fashion product based mainly on wants not needs, just how it is. Opt out and celebrate with a rigid SS or embrace the choice and accept the need to market stuff that makes no real odds to most of us anyway. Added gears, droppers, discs, suspension, strip the riding experience back to what it is for many and there's no real need for most of the 'new' stuff out there imo.


 
Posted : 05/09/2013 2:19 pm
Page 2 / 5