[Closed] Cyclocross bikes - I've seen the light!

Thanks I'll check them out.

For all those saying a CX bike is faster on some terrain, exactly what terrain is that and why?

Basically a cross bike will be faster on tracks which aren't rooty or rocky because the combination of small fast tyres, long low position, light weight, higher gearing, bigger wheels and no suspension come together to make fast. Just watch some of the Belgian world cup race clips on YouTube etc to see quite how fast they go.

I nearly bought the Kona, but decided to splash and went for a Condor Terra X instead. I hope is worth the extra money!

I will post piccies and review in 3 weeks time, when it arrives! Can't wait...

cynic-al - Member
latter

Oh and I only have experience of sxc courses, which I understand are a bit more gnarly than the southern softy stuff.

I think my cross bike is faster up to the point where the trail gets technical and a proper mountainbike is needed to do the job properly (except for the riding gods). But for people like me with crap technical skills, picking up a light cross bike and running with it may be a faster option anyway 🙂

I even considered doing this years 'Puffer on mine, but the greater likelihood of punctures put me off that idea.

How do you get on with the narrow bars on these things?
Personally I love the precision and leverage you can get off wide riser bars.

It's a whole different ball game in terms of handling IMO. No doubt you can learn to ride them well off-road, for me at least that would have take time...and inclination that I did not have!

Never really found it a problem. Skinny tyres pumped up hard, pinging off things are what takes up my attention 🙂

This was from the Pentlands:

[img] http://images.fotopic.net/?iid=yqlcfk&outx=683&quality=70 [/img]

[img] http://images.fotopic.net/?iid=yqlcfl&outx=800&quality=70 [/img]

[img] http://images.fotopic.net/?iid=yqnm97&outx=800&quality=70 [/img]

Made it much more fun since a relatively untechnical area became so much more interesting - as clubber says, skinny tyres, pinging off roots and blasting through the singletrack.

Basically a cross bike will be faster on tracks which aren't rooty or rocky because the combination of small fast tyres, long low position, light weight, higher gearing, bigger wheels and no suspension come together to make fast.

I'll note a few points for you:
Typical CX wheels and tyres are only 3% bigger in diameter than a 2.1" tyre on a MTB wheel. About the same difference a 2.3 makes.
Studies have shown that high pressure in narrow tyres off-road has more rolling resistance.
Weight makes no difference on the flat (it's also possible to build a hardtail lighter than most people's crossers - there's little between my FS and my crosser!)
You can lockout suspension when you don't need it and unlock where it makes you faster.

Also worth pointing out that when they've done comparative studies of speed between hardtails and FS everybody always thinks they're going faster on the hardtail because the extra impacts make it seem faster, even when the FS has actually been faster.

I have just put some cx tyres on my drop bar dr dew, it flippin rules! fast and fun, not as sketchy on tech stuff as I thought, totally different to my summer season, not better, just different!

[IMG] [/IMG]

How about, I've been riding cross bikes since 1995, I've also been riding mountain bikes since 1987. On some of the riding that I do, I have done it on mtbs (full suss, front suss and SS), cx bikes and MTB tandems. Each of them do different things better (or worse).
I can tell you categorically that on some things the CX bike is faster.
However, you're not going to believe me anyway, so I don't really care anymore.

I can tell you categorically that on some things the CX bike is faster.
However, you're not going to believe me anyway, so I don't really care anymore.

I have a CX bike and I agree it is faster for a limited range of conditions, it's just that those conditions don't tend to be mentioned on threads like this (I don't think anybody has so far on this thread).

What kind of pedals are you guys using? SPDs??

The cheapo SPDs (M550s?) which came with it. If I upgraded it would only be to 520s which I use on the ST4 too.

aracer, what do you want to know? I was racing a cross bike which is probably not much lighter than my lightest, fully rigid mountain bike. Unfortunately, that bike was taken away from me so I had to then race on my mountain bike. I was consistently about 10-15 places down from where I was, and I was completely dead at the end of races. Gearing was the same on the mountain bike.
I did run some 26" CX tyres on it, but found these didn't roll well enough so I put some bigger semi-slick tyres on. I felt the wheels still didn't roll as well, were smaller and heavier. I guess the position on the mountain bike didn't help although I had this as low as I could.

On each acceleration, I would lose slightly and it was just killing me hanging on the back of fast groups.

I was glad to get another cross bike..

Oh, aracer - where did I say it feels faster? I wrote that it was faster.
If I could be bothered I could go and dig out some Garmin data with average speeds, HR etc, for my typical rides which tend to be about 4-8 hours, but TBH I can't as I'm just surfacing every now and then from reviewing and commenting upon stair run off distances on a project.

aP
Possibly meeting up with some of my old roadie mates in the next few weeks, I'll mail you but we'll probably head out of NW London to Amersham way'ish.
Other than that see you at the 2010 CX races 🙂

I had a very similar experience to Traildog in the last CX race I did. It was a tight twisty rooty course with lots of singletrack, partly mud, partly frozen, and I was suffering from a dicky shoulder so I though I'd try riding the MTB for a change. I managed to hang on to my usual mid-pack placing for about a lap, then I shot out the back like excrement through a goose. I don't normally excel at racing, but that time I got completely schooled.

I've also heard people making similar comparisons between cross bikes and light racey MTBs before. Thing is, to get a XC race bike that would be as in the same weight bracket as a cross bike while still keeping the advantages of suspension, you'd need to spend a lot more than the £6-700 you can get a decent beginner cross bike for. You wouldn't want to tour or commute on a blinged-out MTB either. Cross bikes win on the versatility front, every time. 🙂

Based on riding the HONC a few times on my CX bike (and other years on my mtb), it's noticeable where you're suddenly much quicker than mtbs that you were riding about the same pace as before.

Specifically fireroad type trails when climbing and grass in all conditions up, down and flat.

I have my CX bike set up with the bars, saddle, cleats, the whole position, set up similarly to my hardtail, and there's no mistaking that on most surfaces it kicks the MTBs bottom. I've yet to conduct a scientific trial of why exactly, but I dont worry about it, I just ride and accept it!

Made it much more fun since a relatively untechnical area became so much more interesting - as clubber says, skinny tyres, pinging off roots and blasting through the singletrack.

And many technical trails would be, I suspect, unrideable, or at least a lot slower.

[b]Yes, but why do you think those aspects make it fast?[/b]

For the same reasons a road bike is faster than an MTB on-road. Maybe there's not enough "Mountain" in yer' typical XC course/in the South to call upon the supposed advantages of a "Mountain Bike"...

many technical trails would be, I suspect, unrideable

That's when you pick it up and carry it, doye. 😉

cynic-al, that could be turned round the other way as well; On a typical mountainbike many less technial offroad distance routes would be 'absolute purgatory or, I suspect, at least a lot slower'
.
For me the few minutes that I might lose on certain downhills, or techy sections, are more than made up with by the speed elsewhere.

Exactly Mr Agreeable. That's the 'cross' bit. The cross in CX has a different meaning to the cross in xc, or am I drunk.

[i]Cross bikes win on the versatility front, every time. [/i]

Mr Agreeable has it in one. Sure there are situations where a MTB is going to be "better" (faster, easier to ride, whatever your definition of better might be) but there are also situations where a CX will be "better" (same definition).

I could do 20 road miles on mine out to an off-road area (trail centre or similar), do a lap of that and ride 20 miles home again without being completely dead. Try doing that on an MTB - you wouldn't, you'd just drive out to the trail centre.

Out of interest, Ive had my cross bike round Glentress black, and didnt find it bad, the climbs (with a non-purist wide ratio cassette :oops:) seemed easier in fact.
I've also had it on a few routes such as Glen Tilt, and the MTBers I was with were getting a bit annoyed at me pulling away all the time (trust me, this wasn't down to fitness)
BTW, oldgit, pished at this time of the day? I am liking your style 🙂

That's like the mixed bike event I did. For a while I was well up on guys I KNOW are quicker. Then we hit this section, like a mini Mangrove swamp and I just fell right back. It's the one thing you just can't do on a crosser, constantly having to hop stuff and stay fast. The guys on MTB's were just cruising through.
What crazy legs hinted at up there is how I train over winter, road/off road/road.

Yes, but why do you think those aspects make it fast? Out of those things you expend power on in cycling, which are you now expending less power on?

I'll note a few points for you:
Typical CX wheels and tyres are only 3% bigger in diameter than a 2.1" tyre on a MTB wheel. About the same difference a 2.3 makes.
Studies have shown that high pressure in narrow tyres off-road has more rolling resistance.
Weight makes no difference on the flat (it's also possible to build a hardtail lighter than most people's crossers - there's little between my FS and my crosser!)
You can lockout suspension when you don't need it and unlock where it makes you faster.

Also worth pointing out that when they've done comparative studies of speed between hardtails and FS everybody always thinks they're going faster on the hardtail because the extra impacts make it seem faster, even when the FS has actually been faster.

High volume, lowish pressure bald tyre (well worn RR for instance) is much faster on easy forestry track type stuff than a rock hard CX tyre IME. Much comfier too. Ive got a pair of Vittoria 32c, used once 😉 going cheap if anyone is interested.

That said, I do enjoy taking my old road bike with cow horns and touring tyres off road for all the reason people have mentioned above. It's [i]meant[/i] to be fun remember.

Bedmaker, I generally run my CX tyres at less than 50psi, thats not rock hard is it?
If a lightweight FS bike is so efficient, then how come they dont get used in races like Paris-Roubaix?

This isn't going anywhere is it. There are exceptions, but in general cross bikes are quicker in cross races and MTB's are quicker in XC races.
Put both types of bike in everyday non race situations and there isn't a lot in it.

Bedmaker. I remember a test being carried out at Sandwell park (the old MM venue) some class riders went out and did some laps on hardtails, then went out on short travel sussers (possibly NRS's or Sugars) they all said their first laps on the hardtails were quicker, but they weren't they were quicker on the sussers.

They did once. How it faired I don't know, clues probably in the word 'once'
[img] [/img]

Oldgit, I think that one broke halfway round.

My own feeling is that its the weight distibution/ ride position and drop bars of crossers that makes them faster, not the tyre or wheel size.