Cycle to work schem...
 

[Closed] Cycle to work scheme - still worth it or not?

Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Looking at a new road bike, Ribble Sportive Bianco which will be ~£1000. As a higher rate taxpayer is it still worth doing C2W now (as I understand it), you don't get VAT off and final payment is likely to be £250?

Thanks for any advice


 
Posted : 30/09/2011 7:51 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Does an interest-free loan sound appealing to you or do you have the money available? If the latter, why not have this discussion with the shop and see what they say?


 
Posted : 30/09/2011 7:57 am
 Drac
Posts: 50558
 

You've never had VAT off and the final payment may be £250, I paid £120.

You still save some money depending on your tax level, the more you pay the more you save. It's about encouraging people to buy bikes to commute to work not about getting a cheap bike.


 
Posted : 30/09/2011 8:01 am
Posts: 27603
Free Member
 

It's worth remembering:

A) to pay cash for the bike you would have had to earn £1400, to have £1k to spend. This way then is effectively 40% cheaper

B) its an interest free loan, and tax free money

C) the final payment is scalable depending on how long you keep the bike without buying it from you employer, but even after year 1 it's £250 cheaper unless you can get that discount through your LBS. I think after year 4 it's a negligible amount.


 
Posted : 30/09/2011 8:07 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

My understanding is that HMRC had clarified some issue in the last week or so about VAT and C2W which ate in to saving. Also guidance for Market value of bikes over £5/600 is 25% after a year? I may be accused of abusing scheme as I already share commuting duties between roadrat and knackered giant OCR but am considering swapping OCR for something better - hence the Q


 
Posted : 30/09/2011 8:10 am
Posts: 17
Free Member
 

most companies have adopted the 3 year final option which extends the hire for a nominal fee to 3 years (no company ties etc) and reduces final payment to small amount. Cyclescheme website explains it fairly well.

As said above the money is tax free


 
Posted : 30/09/2011 8:28 am
Posts: 919
Free Member
 

I charge our C2W staff 5% after a year as a nominal fee to extend the agreement until the value is zero.

As others have said, you still save the tax and its an interst free loan. Ive also found most bike shops give me a 12% discount as we do the C2W paperwork, not them.

When I say paperwork, that actually means a simple form I got off the internet that the employee signs. There is not really any admin to do.


 
Posted : 30/09/2011 8:34 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The final value fee of 25% after 1 year's hire imposed by HMRC is only if you end the hire agreement and receive the taxable benefit (bike). If you increase the hire period the residual value upon which HMRC want £ for reduces accordingly. I've just extended the hire period for another 3 years for £70 instead of paying £250 to own my bike.

However, due to some fiddle some company has done the EU have ruled that these types of benefits are subject to VAT on the hire payments!

This should answer your questions [url= http://www.cyclescheme.co.uk/employers/employer-updates/cyclescheme-hmrc-vat-update-faqs ][/url]


 
Posted : 30/09/2011 8:47 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I read yesterday that it was HMRC looking at Rolls Royce scheme that led to VAT clarification/change


 
Posted : 30/09/2011 8:59 am
Posts: 6934
Full Member
 

The final payment seemed ok to me when I looked at it - the extra 3 years or whatever it is definitively did not. That's with cyclescheme though, maybe different with other set ups.
Riding a bike for 4 years that you don't own isn't that appealing to me - it's too long a time period to be committed for, particularly as you're talking about bikes under a grand so not major long term purchases.


 
Posted : 30/09/2011 9:44 am
 pdw
Posts: 2206
Free Member
 

I think the review of Rolls Royce lead to the final value guidance, not the VAT change.

The answer is that it can still be worth it but it depends on your scheme. If it's done through a commercial operator like Cyclescheme, they will take a cut from the shop which may limit your ability to get sale bikes, or a discount.

Also, the amount that the company charges you varies depending on the scheme. Most companies actually make money on the scheme as they don't have to pay employer's NI on the rental payments, but there's no reason why the rental payments can't be lower to take this into account.


 
Posted : 30/09/2011 9:58 am
Posts: 6
Free Member
 

Our lot do it through Cyclescheme and I took the "13th monthly payment to lease for another 3 years at which point it's yours at no extra (as HMRC will have valued it at bugger all" (to paraphrase). This seems to be the 'Scheme's fix for the valuation guidance HMRC issued.

However, I don't like the fact the bike remains the Scheme's and so, if HMRC change things again, I could have yet another set of "rules" applied where I might have to pay more.

Personally I'd rather have taken it as a BIK and paid the income tax on that. Not an option through our lot though.


 
Posted : 30/09/2011 10:23 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Is final payment salary sacrifice too or cold hard cash? - ie is £250 at the end of 12 months costing me £250 off take home or £250 of gross salary?


 
Posted : 30/09/2011 10:28 am