[Closed] Cube Race Hardtail Carbon or Aluminium Frame

I have this same query....

The reviews on the Cube alu 29er frames normally say they're somewhat stiff and uncompromising race frames but I haven't ridden one.

I rode a carbon Cube 29er a couple of weekends ago and that felt pretty solid. More solid through the saddle than the carbon Scott Scale I also tried....

The man from Cube said they stiffness test each frame. If you crash it you can send it back and they can analyse whether its damaged by comparing the stiffness recorded at manufacture with the stiffness post-crash. He also said they exceed the required European impact standards (?) by about a factor of 3 or 4.

tis true, cube carbon frames are tested to 4 times the euro impact standards.

Check availability before setting your heart on one. Cube tend not to make a whole load of these.

A friend that I race with recently purchased the Reaction GTC SL 29 which is the high end model (altho I believe its the same carbon frame on the cheaper models too)and has managed to severely crack the frame under the bottom bracket after a few months of riding. It might just be a freak accident but I don't think an alu frame would ever crack in that way.

i've got a cube carbon reaction in carbon, it's a beauty.

I've got a carbon reaction and I love it. Its very stiff, direct, accelerates easily and carries the speed. It climbs really well (for me) which is my weakest area of riding and hence is probably my fastest overall bike. With regard to strength, I am about 108kg and am pretty hard on my kit usually, but having ridden it more as a trail bike, rather than for pure XC, I have not had any problems with it, despite clattering through wrong lines. Because it is so stiff, you always know when you have ridden it as there is a bit of dull back ache, but it's worth it for the sensation of speed and how quick it covers the ground compared to my other bikes, for which you sacrifice some comfort. You won't be disappointed, if you want an responsive, racy ride.

How long have you had the bike?
I thought that he point of carbon was that it should usually be lighter. But in this case as the 2 models weight the same I'm undecided. Did you choose the carbon for the stiffness?
Cheers

Did you say the forks and brakes were different? There could easily be enough difference in those components to cancel out the weight saving of a carbon frame.

Would have thought the alu version will have better components?

Carbon won't necessarily be stiffer but it seems easier to make carbon frames stiff yet generally more absorbtive of general trail buzz.

the alu frame is £100 cheaper and comes with a reba air srung fork and magura mt4 brakes. the carbon frame comes with a Manitou Marvel fork and shimano deore am16 brakes. otherwise the bikes are identical...

+1 I have the Cube GTC carbon.

Lovely bike. Mine is now 9kg (albeit rigid).

Tempted by a GTC Pro 29er frame here. People still liking theirs? Makes for a good XC race bike? Any reason to avoid?

I have a Reaction GTC SL 650b carbon, really great bike to ride, stiff but comfortable and handles really well, been racing mine for the last year so it's been through various terrains and conditions and crashed a couple of times and is still as good as new. I have nothing negative to say about it.

Thanks. Seen reports of a few breaking, but guess that's much the same with any frame.

Quick bump for the morning crowd. Reaction GTC anyone?

I'm trying to decide between the carbon GTC SL and the Aluminium HPA SL - mainly fire roads, etc and a bit our touring planned. Any thoughts on either?