Forum menu
Not once have i had that maxtorque
Only get that attitude on the road
The funny thing is, that these people who's days are "ruined" by hearing an engine are never found in the proper, wild, and still undertrod far flung places.
These proper, wild places. Scotland has made it's own arrangements, where are there any of them in England or Wales? I can't think of one, only the North Pennines and Northumberland would come close.
The counrty side is a working place , not just an attraction for those that don't live there
This is true, it's easy to assume that all 4WD/motorised access on these routes is recreational/greenlaners, when a fair bit of damage is tractors/permitted use.
Personally I think an opportunity has been missed by not taking a more holistic approach to the solution rather than simply banning thrm (and thereby pushing them onto fewer and fewer routes, increasing the damage, which in turn justifies a further Ben), the forestry Commission could have earned a fortune from paid 4WD
[i]So you've never been on your bike and been shouted at / challenged by walkers who want you off "their" paths (even the legal bridleways) because "mountain bikers always go too fast and are dangerous to walkers"?[/i]
In 15 years + maybe once or twice, but, being shouted at by grumpy a-holes is still a million miles away from the actual bodies which have authority banning you 'cause you do too much damage.
midlifecrashes
These proper, wild places. where are there any of them in England or Wales?
I'm not telling you! 😉
Seriously though, get an OS map, learn to read it, and there are thousands of places you can have the countryside to yourself still, often within 5miles of major towns and cities too! I can think of days i've spent walking/cycling on Dartmoor, Exmoor, Quantocks, Mendips, South/Mid/North Wales, even in the busy south / midlands where i've not even met a single other user on our rights of way network!
nickcIn 15 years + maybe once or twice, but, being shouted at by grumpy a-holes is still a million miles away from the actual bodies which have authority banning you 'cause you do too much damage.
I'm not going to suggest that riding a MTB is as an contentious an issue as driving a 4x4, but it's worth remembering the sort of people who have the time, inclination and money to kick up a fuss are often difficult to ignore by the councils and people responsible for our rights of way networks. Often retired, well off, and what you'd call "influential" people, they can cause enough of a fuss to make simply barring access for one user group look like the easy option for overworked, underfunded civil servants.
So 5 miles from a major town is proper wild now? OK. 😆
see up there my post about logical fallacies.
the Ramblers are all about making sure that existing ROW are open to them, and that their access rights are being widened, and below is a direct lift from their "Off road vehicles on footpaths" section
[i]4x4s, motorbikes and other off-road vehicles using footpaths, bridleways and other tracks is a problem in many parts of the countryside.
In places people are greeted with thunderous engines, deep ruts left by 4x4s, and have to jump out of the way when motorbikes whizz past. We feel this isn't just unpleasant, it's dangerous.
There are some laws in place to limit the damage caused by off-road vehicles. But it still represents a large problem for many walkers, [b]cyclists,[/b] horse-riders and other vulnerable users.[/i]
Ramblers are on OUR side
Hands up every english mountain biker that's never ridden a cheeky footpath.
Restrict motor vehicles to a very limited number of areas. Act surprised when those limited areas get too much traffic. Act surprised when some motor vehicles go outwith those areas, and use that to attack greenlaners in general. Mention that there are purpose built venues they can go to so kicking them off the bridleways won't stop them going offroad. Oh and observe that these roads weren't made for motor vehicles, and that the bridlway network is crowded.
There's no part of this argument that you won't also hear aimed at mountain bikes. Motorised access is a bit more controversial because of the noise and damage but the argument against always comes down to "I want to do my thing in the countryside and I want to stop other people doing their thing". The solution as for all trail contention is wider, better access.
midlifecrashes
So 5 miles from a major town is proper wild now? OK.
No, i'm not suggesting that there are places with the wilderness of say Alaska or Siberia just 5miles from a major UK town.
BUT, there are plenty of "wild" places you can have to "yourself" that are! You don't need to say follow the crowd to the popular over crowded tourist attractions of places like say Edale in the Peaks to find our own adventures!
Am I the only one that thinks that you should have the land owners permission to ride a motorbike or 4x4 across their land? Might not be the legal position, but perhaps it should be. Not the same as walking, horse riding, cycling, and mobility scooter use at all… far more damaging and intrusive, no?
Ramblers are on OUR side
I would strongly disagree there, on the basis of the Ramblers having objected to every upgrade from Footpath to Bridleway or RB that I have seen in my local area, and having sat across from the RA regional rep at LAF as he made the exact same 'whizzing past at speed' 'forced to jump out of the way' and 'dangerous' comments about mountain bikers!
kelvin - MemberAm I the only one that thinks that you should have the land owners permission to ride a motorbike or 4x4 across their land? Might not be the legal position, but perhaps it should be. Not the same as walking, horse riding, cycling, and mobility scooter use at all… far more damaging and intrusive, no?
Pretty sure in Northern Ireland there are no ROW paths/bridleways so all access to/through some one's land requires permission from the land owner. Which with the liability concerns/claims these days, means it pretty much doesn't happen.
As for people complaining about the noise of engines in the countryside and ruts, I bet these people haven't heard the common noise of a 20 year old tractor with a duff exhaust or just a piece of pipe under load/working the land. Or that the reason a field or across road they are walking along is badly rutted is because due to restrictions put in place giving farmers small windows of time when they can spread slurry, meant that even though the land was still wet the farmer had to go out and spread the slurry on it, cutting up the ground in the process.
the argument against off roading is just hypocritical nonsense, they are arguing that you cant use these tracks for pleasure but you can if you live there and work on the land.
pure a holes all of them.
the banning wont stop people using the lanes, just make sure that when you ride them you dont stop and hang about, keep your number plate muddy and fek off anyone who gives you any grief.
Sancho - Member
the argument against off roading is just hypocritical nonsense, they are arguing that you cant use these tracks for pleasure but you can if you live there and work on the land.pure a holes all of them.
Having had the misfortune to live around one of Lancashire's mill towns and head up into the hills to find the locals think off roading on motorbikes etc. involves trying to ride up a boggy hill thrashing the throttle as hard as you can until the rut you create is bigger than the bike there is a massive difference between recreational and business use.
Some farm tracks are unsuitable for use during the year simply because excessive use would mean the land owner would need to rebuild, armour etc. rather than use an alternative. Who would foot the bill for sorting out the track? You can guarantee that the long term solution would be a long bland aggregate road in the style that STW likes to get all upset about. So perhaps that is it, the solution to green lanes are to surface them all properly making them both suitable for long term use and really dull (hence reducing traffic)
Ninfan is correct the ramblers are notorious for objecting to status change on footpaths to bridleways, the Byeways and Bridleways Trust fight for our collective rights to use these rights of way. No legal 4x4 or trail motorcycle go "off road" they use legal unsurfaced roads (these remain our legal right and constitute less than 1% of the public rights of way in England and Wales)
If anyone here thinks you are welcome in the countryside by the Ramblers association or part of their "team" crack on and enjoy your trail centre.
The damage argument is a load of b*******ks - when the ramblers destroy parts of the Pennines way they get tons of stone helicoptered in and duckboards by the mile.
A track fixed after damage by 4x4
[img] 
[/img]
Is that what you want?
It's terrible. if greenlaning is stopped there will be nowhere left for people to drive cars.
My opinion only, but...
When you drive about on Bridleways in your 20 year old Discovery with your family of over weight kids and wife with all your mates in similar vehicles in the name of 'enjoying the countryside' or 'getting out into the great outdoors' without leaving your vehicle but just milling the sides of the trail with the over sized tyres you fitted you look like a dick.
'One life, live it'. But don't do it sat on your fat arse in a truck that destroy habitat and restrict access to any other form of transport by rutting up the trails where you believe more power is the answer to everything. Did I mention, you look like a dick, at best.
No-one's answered the point that I see as: If you wreck the track so that others can't use it, you ain't going to be popular.
Or if they have, I've missed it.
And it wasn't just The Ridgeway. I didn't have an opinion until a convoy of 17 (yes, seventeen) four by fours passed me in Stockton Wood near the 303. The ruts made that track unuseable.
If they came back later with picks and shovels I missed that too.
All I want is for the Nibthwaite Descent to get restricted so I don't have to wait behind a train of 'Kankku' offroad tourists every single bloody time I try to go down it! 😀
Otherwise it's good to have the buffer of motorised vehicles in between us and fur-hat lady from countryfile. If a complete ban was every implemented, she'd have to find someone else who was ruining her enjoyment of the countryside.
My local green lane was repaired last summer.
This is how it looks now
[URL= http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h82/Paul_Fulford/05057BD9-C641-49E6-A10E-5BE79E3DD1B7_zpszyeqdqix.jp g" target="_blank">
http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h82/Paul_Fulford/05057BD9-C641-49E6-A10E-5BE79E3DD1B7_zpszyeqdqix.jp g"/> [/IMG][/URL]
[i]If a complete ban was every implemented, she'd have to find someone else who was ruining her enjoyment of the countryside.[/i]
Why do people keep saying this, as if it's some sort of fact? Are we all so afraid of our own shadows? Mountain biking is a pretty established part of the countryside "scene" now, no-one bats an eyelid at us anymore (even if they ever did way back when...)
Does anyone know of any examples where once there have been traffic orders put in place to restrict 4x4's the next thing was a downgrading of the status of the BW to footpath so that MTB was banned as well?
Surely there is a middle way here? I'm completely against the idea that certain groups shouldn't be allowed to enjoy the countryside because of their chosen way of enjoying it.
Something like Scotland's laws of "access with permission" would make sense. Or even a halfway house of their open access laws- if you aren't going to damage the track in its current condition then go ahead. The Roych, Chapel Gate, probably the Roman Road- all can stand up perfectly well to the limited amount of motorised traffic they will get. Common sense applies, if a ranger catches you on a track that's sodden and liable to get ripped to bits then a large fine can be imposed.
IME horse riders are particularly bad for not applying common sense to their use of trails- several near me are ripped to shreds because they insist on keeping taking their horses along them in the wet and now they're impassable with any sense of enjoyment by anyone other than a horse rider.
[quote=munrobiker ]IME horse riders are particularly bad for not applying common sense to their use of trails- several near me are ripped to shreds because they insist on keeping taking their horses along them in the wet and now they're impassable with any sense of enjoyment by anyone other than a horse rider.Indeed - and there's a 100 mile horsey event taking place through the Cairngorms later this year that will leave some very soft tracks in a complete mess for ages to come.
Thin end of the wedge....?
Nonsense.
I think we need to make a clear distinction between what recreational use of countryside rights of way is for: non-motorised enjoyment of the landscape through clean air and relative peace.
And what it is not for: neanderthal idiots marauding along 2km long isolated stretches of badly eroded 'green lane', motorised access to which is simply an anachronism - and impinges enjoyment of the countryside for the majority of other recreational stakeholders.
There isn't a 'thin end'. Combustion engines simply shouldn't belong on rights of way. They can't ever be used in ways that don't severely affect other recreational users of the countryside. The same can't be said for bikes, or pogo sticks, or horses, or fatbikes, or whatever.. 🙂
"There isn't a 'thin end'. Combustion engines simply shouldn't belong on rights of way"
And you call others "neanderthal"! Your user name seems apt.
I guess that would make you quite special then.
We can resort to name calling if you like, but perhaps a more nuanced approach might be to describe how someone controlling >1 tonnes of >100hp metal down an unsurfaced road, prone to erosion, and used by others largely seeking enjoyment from clean green space is somehow being considerate to other users of the countryside.
Explain your point of view in a nuanced way, please. Please genuinely do. I am intrigued to know what the appeal of it is, from a 4x4 perspective.
I hate the bikes me. Every now and again we get a swarm of them here, up to 30 bikes taking over the road making a right racket. They came past me on our road once and made my son cry in his buggy.
So on the basis that I don't like them and I live in the country, then surely an outright ban is the only possible conclusion?
Last year I rode around Staveley, I was on the top of a big hill when about 20 motorbikers appeared on the Moor making their own tracks towards the path.
They caught up to us at the gate which was locked. They proceeded to destroy the barbed wire fence so they could get over it.
Then at the bottom of the hill had to hide from the rangers as they knew they were in the wrong.
Personally I don't mind motor vehicles out and about but follow the rules, leave only footprints etc. Don't fubar it for the rest of us who like to enjoy the routes kindly left open by the land owners
I think we need to make a clear distinction between what recreational use of countryside rights of way is for: non-motorised enjoyment of the landscape through clean air and relative peace.
So, where do you stand on mobility vehicles/electric tramper buggies?
How about E-bikes?
combustion engines simply shouldn't belong on rights of way
E-motorbikes and hydrogen fuel cell powered motorbikes OK then?
[img] 
/revision/latest?cb=20130625234800[/img]
[img] 
[/img]
[img] 
/revision/latest?cb=20130626001025[/img]
[img] 
[/img]
They came past me on our road once and made my son cry in his buggy.
Your son needs to MTFU.
Seriously though, lots of things make children cry but that doesnt mean pandering to irrational fears/phobias and banning them.
FFS live and let live people.
The reason so many bikes and/or 4x4s congregate on the same trails and 'destroy' them is exactly because of restrictions put in place...the more you take away Byways Open To All Traffic the more use the remaining ones will get.
Go down the Scotland route of open access and spread the load so to speak, there is enough green countryside out there for horse riders, cyclists, ramblers, green laning etc to take place without being on top of each other....people just need to stop being so mean spirited about their particular hobby and stop trying to ban others from enjoying theirs.
"Go down the Scotland route of open access and spread the load so to speak, there is enough green countryside out there for horse riders, cyclists, ramblers, green laning"
NO NO NO this is wrong.
In scotland you cannot take your vehicle off the highway. Your motorbike or your 4x4 on "green lanes" without explicit permission from the owner is not allowed.
Organised events , trail days etc are run "fairly" responsibly and with owners permission to cross the land.
Any other use of 4x4s and motorbikes for recreation on scottish hills is not allowed and if your lucky the gamie will give you a warning shot across the bows.
Our system works specifically for this reason. it promotes responsible land access and not tearing up the hillside in your 4x4 for no apparent reason.
(and thats from someone who would like to take his 4x4 off the beaten track more / outside of competitions and organised days.... how ever ill come down to england and bother you guys for that :D)
Go down the Scotland route of open access and spread the load so to speak, there is enough green countryside out there for horse riders, cyclists, ramblers, green laning etc to take place without being on top of each other....people just need to stop being so mean spirited about their particular hobby and stop trying to ban others from enjoying theirs.
That would be the Scotland where 'Green Laning' is banned without the landowners permission? [edit beaen too it]
The difference between 4x4's and mountian bikes is that the 4x4 does a huge ammount of damage by a small number of people, mountainbikes, even if we collectively did as much damage to a track that's hundreds/thousands of MTB'ers buying cake and talking rubbish in the pub Vs one tubby guy in a battered TD5 from Stoke-on-Trent.
*which I'm fairly sure we don't, even the busiest, muddiest track at Swinley pre the makeover weren't 8ft wide and 2ft deep rutts (maybe 8ft wide though!)
I've seen The Ridgeway mentioned in this thread a few times. I walked the length around 20 years ago when vehicles were permitted to use it, I found it incredibly sad that what was believed to be Europe's oldest road was trashed to such an extent that it was a case of walking two steps forward then taking one step back. My progress was extremely slow.
Am so pleased that it has been restored and that many more folk are able to enjoy this historic and beautiful trail.
Your son needs to MTFU.Seriously though, lots of things make children cry but that doesnt mean pandering to irrational fears/phobias and banning them.
I'll tell him but he's only 1 so not sure he'll get the gyst.
You however need to lighten up and learn to spot sarcasm.
I think he may have - somewhat sarcastically - been ignoring yours.
HTH 🙂
Segregation of one type of trail/path/person from another is not the way forward IMO.*
Common sense, human decency and mutual respect for other users is the way forward.
(* though in the modern world, it unfortunately is - any excuse for more rules and regulations!)
cinnamon_girl
I've seen The Ridgeway mentioned in this thread a few times. I walked the length around 20 years ago when vehicles were permitted to use it, I found it incredibly sad that what was believed to be Europe's oldest road was trashed to such an extent that it was a case of walking two steps forward then taking one step back. My progress was extremely slow.Am so pleased that it has been restored and that many more folk are able to enjoy this historic and beautiful trail.
Sorry, but that^^ pretty much is exactly my point! The Ridgeway is a very old road. Roads are used to move people, goods and livestock around. Had you been alive in 1650, you would have found the same Ridgeway, with even more mud, and the same difficult walking conditions. It has not been "trashed" and "restored", it has been "surfaced" and "upgraded". We only see nice, clean, stone/gravel roads as "restored" because that fits our quaint modern day take on the countryside, as seen on thousands of calendars and chocolate boxes!
This is what most of our (working) countryside actually looks like:
[img] 
[/img]
However, the Farmers and Landowners has spent a lot of money, time, and effort surfacing (generally with non "native" infill) such tracks so that they look like this:
[img] 
[/img]
Contrary to popular belief, it is the second picture in which the natural ecosystem has been "trashed"!
I don't get the green laning hate.
A muddy track gets made more muddy by motorbikes and 4x4s, so what?!....it's not like these vehicles are being driven through fields of crops and across areas of special scientific interest.
Oh no, you can't ride your MTB down it anymore, boo-flipping-hoo....ride somewhere else like you're telling green laners to do!
Deviant, you can drive your Land Rover 4x4 through a SSI, as long as youre the land owner or someone employed by the land owner in fact its ok to quarry, mine, and do what you like as long as youre the land owner, and as all farmers are slim and have slim children its ok for these slim athletes to ride on a track in a 4x4 but fat families from the city are not as they destroy the place.
We have hardcore tracks on ilkley moor that you can drive a 4x4 across as long as youre shooting birds, but you cant ride a bicycle on them as they scare the birds and its an SSI, the country access debate is a mess with self interets everywhere,
I also laugh at the suggestion that motorbikes are tearing about the place, yes they do, but these are illegal, and always have been so the last change in the law didnt stop them, but that's because the police arent doing anything about them. They do enjoy taking their BMW x5 up a track and waiting all day to stop half a dozen legal riders and then do their best to get them for something, typically a small number plate or a light out. But the police are there as a private police for the wealthy landowners who dont want anyone up there other than paying customers.
joke all round.
Had you been alive in 1650, you would have found [u]the same Ridgeway[/u], with even more mud, and the same difficult walking conditions
Please cite your sources. I'm not quite sure how multiple >1 tonne 4x4s, with >100bhp are equivalent to 100s, or even 1000s of sheep and cattle passing over a trail three centuries ago.
it is the second picture in which the natural ecosystem has been "trashed"!
As an academic working in ecological science at a leading university, my mind boggles at this statement. Again, please give your reasoning behind this and cite sources..
Nice primroses though 🙂
/\ /\ /\
Really 😯
I appreciate that people want to ride motorised transport in the countryside, don't have a problem with that. What I do have a problem with is showy offy types on mx'ers who think it's fun to intimidate an old girl riding a bike on her own when there's not enough space to share. It's not clever to buzz me and generally act selfishly by splattering me. They're supposed to give way to me, horse riderists, walkerists etc.
There are people who will never share the countryside and that also includes mountain bikers, walkers and horse riders.
Edit: will say again that if only motorised transport users would come to a complete stop when they've finished a section of trail, take a look at the state of it and decide whether they're making it worse for other users.