Forum menu
Changing cages on a...
 

Changing cages on a rear derailleur?

Posts: 1992
Full Member
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Do short and longer cage mechs, of the same type, use different parallelogram geometry?

In my case, R8000 series Shimano Ultegra; I've got a R8050-SS but want lower overall gearing so wanted to replace the cage with that from a R8050-GS (the parts are available and detachable so theoretically it's possible).

Was discussing this in my LBS when the mechanic mentioned that the parallelogram geometry on the SS and GS may be different...

Firstly, does anyone know if this is true? Can't see anything specific in the Shimano documentation...

Secondly, even if it is, what impact will it actually have on shifting?

Thirdly, he said adding a longer rear cage is designed for increasing FRONT derailleur capacity, not REAR derailleur capacity, which confused me. Is he right?


 
Posted : 27/02/2023 6:29 pm
Posts: 3064
Free Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

A. Not true
B. None
C. And not right


 
Posted : 27/02/2023 6:52 pm
Posts: 3064
Free Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

The cage is purely to take up slack off the chain when the chain is longer cage needs to be.
The parallelogram is the same as it moves across the same space/cogs


 
Posted : 27/02/2023 6:53 pm
Posts: 13862
Free Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

vlad_the_invader

Thirdly, he said adding a longer rear cage is designed for increasing FRONT derailleur capacity, not REAR derailleur capacity, which confused me. Is he right?

Sort of - the rear mech has to take up all the slack, so capacity needs to account for (Biggest-smallest at front) + (biggest-smallest at back)


 
Posted : 27/02/2023 7:00 pm
Posts: 1992
Full Member
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

The parallelogram is the same as it moves across the same space/cogs

The mechanic was saying that the arc that some derailleurs moves through is/can be different if the derailleur is intended to be used with a close ratio cassette vs a wide ratio cassette, which sounds plausible but maybe he's thinking "marginal losses"!

Anyway, he said not all derailleurs are optimized like this...so I have no idea whether it's a problem for my derailleur or how to confirm one way or another, and I have no idea whether I'd even notice...

(For the record, I'm not a racer nor a particularly clumsy rider so not likely to make hurried gear changes under my full, awesome power 😄)


 
Posted : 27/02/2023 7:52 pm
Posts: 120
Free Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I've done this on R7000 105 and it worked fine. SS to GS cage.


 
Posted : 28/02/2023 12:08 am
Posts: 1992
Full Member
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I’ve done this on R7000 105 and it worked fine. SS to GS cage.

Interesting...

Did you put a wider range cassette on, or change chainrings (or both)?


 
Posted : 28/02/2023 12:47 am
Posts: 6932
Full Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Thirdly, he said adding a longer rear cage is designed for increasing FRONT derailleur capacity, not REAR derailleur capacity, which confused me. Is he right?

Front mechs have a capacity of up to 17 teeth, dictated by the geometry between the inner and outer cages - go bigger and you’ll have problems getting a clean, reliable shift. Different/modified rear mech won’t make a difference.


 
Posted : 28/02/2023 8:11 am
 mos
Posts: 1588
Full Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

The top jockey wheel is placed slightly further away from the point at which the cage rotates on a larger capacity cage/mech. This means that when the chain is pulled tighter, the wheel moves further away from the sprockets so that it doesn't clash. I've swapped cages on a GRX & Force AXS mech recently & its not that hard.


 
Posted : 28/02/2023 9:33 am
Posts: 8902
Free Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Thirdly, he said adding a longer rear cage is designed for increasing FRONT derailleur capacity, not REAR derailleur capacity, which confused me. Is he right?

Sounds like he is talking about when road bikes came with double or triple chainsets. Back then the cage length on the rear mech was matched to the chainset. Short cage (SS) for double, medium cage (GS) for triple.


 
Posted : 28/02/2023 10:40 am
Posts: 120
Free Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I’ve done this on R7000 105 and it worked fine. SS to GS cage.

Interesting…

Did you put a wider range cassette on, or change chainrings (or both)?

Neither - I had a crash and the derailleur cage took the brunt of the impact. I wanted to be able to use an 11-34 cassette so bought the GS parts and it worked fine. I've not needed a new cassette since then so still using the old one, and I've had no issues.


 
Posted : 28/02/2023 11:09 am