Bear with me a mome...
 

[Closed] Bear with me a moment, Dialled Alpine as a fully rigid? - opinions

Posts: 5121
Full Member
Topic starter
 

Considering trying this fully rigid thing, did think about putting a rigid fork on my Cotic Soul, but my Alpine is hanging on the wall and not getting used too much (a bit heavy compared to the Soul).

so.........

What about a 29" rigid fork on that. The 29" on-ones are 470mm A-C and appear to have very good reviews. I was wondering if to stay with the std 26" wheel or move to a front 29" one.

The 470mm fork is about 25mm less than the bike is currently at with the 140mm 66's on and 30% sag.

My opinion is that the 26" 440mm fork will be too short when used with a 26" wheel.

The other option is of course to try the 44mm 26" fork with a 29" front wheel. This would mean a new wheel, which i'm trying not to have to do.

anybody else tried this with long travel hardtails?

and opinions on the idea or which way to go (with associated pro and con's) welcome.

and by the way try to keep the p1$$ taking down to a minimum please. ๐Ÿ™‚

Mike, your opinion would be ideal if your logged on.


 
Posted : 30/12/2009 9:06 pm
Posts: 6480
Free Member
 

Is it April 1st already?


 
Posted : 30/12/2009 10:14 pm
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

Personally dont like rigid for off road .... you MUST post up pics if you do this though


 
Posted : 30/12/2009 10:20 pm
Posts: 8
Free Member
 

Brave buddy, nae heed.


 
Posted : 30/12/2009 10:27 pm
Posts: 5121
Full Member
Topic starter
 

I thought you were in bed with man flu John?


 
Posted : 30/12/2009 10:42 pm
Posts: 66083
Full Member
 

I just stuck a 120mm-corrected Exotic carbon fork on my Soul... Doesn't take long to swap forks after all, I'll keep the revs usually but it's nice to have options. And it's ace, I doubt "the kids" would like it but it's like getting back to where I came from, only with the benefit of modern kit. It does take a bit of getting used to though...

The Alpine seems like the wrong choice though, since it's built for hammering and hammer is less on the menu with rigids. Though I'm sure it can be done, just not by me ๐Ÿ˜‰ For me half the point is the light weight...


 
Posted : 30/12/2009 10:42 pm
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

yes but footie on radio and wireless laptop ๐Ÿ˜†
Are you also ill?


 
Posted : 30/12/2009 10:44 pm
Posts: 5121
Full Member
Topic starter
 

Are you also ill?

by the opinions on here to this idea, it would seem yes, I am.

The Alpine Frame is only just a pound heavier than the soul BTW


 
Posted : 30/12/2009 10:46 pm
Posts: 66083
Full Member
 

Yup, but a lb isn't too far off the difference between a rigid fork and a lightweight suspension fork. I reckon the Soul's on the heavy side for this sort of silliness tbh, that's why I'm eyeing up a Scandal. Though if I do that, I've ****ed up with the fork length I think, ah well.


 
Posted : 30/12/2009 10:50 pm
Posts: 7357
Free Member
 

Alpine + rigid fork?

Wrong, wrong, wrong...


 
Posted : 30/12/2009 10:52 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Chucky, a couple of Prince Albert owners have done this and used Surly Karate Monkey 29'er forks.

You're correct that 440mm rigids will be too short for a Prince Albert or Alpine.


 
Posted : 30/12/2009 11:45 pm
Posts: 5121
Full Member
Topic starter
 

did they use 29" or stick with the 26" wheels.

and more importantly, did it work OK?


 
Posted : 30/12/2009 11:55 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I should imagine it was sh*t


 
Posted : 31/12/2009 12:25 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Chucky, they just used the 29'er forks to get a more acceptable a-c. They still used 26" wheels on them.


 
Posted : 31/12/2009 10:40 am
Posts: 5121
Full Member
Topic starter
 

cheers Mike, got to be worth a punt I rekon.

watch this space for some 2nd hand Karate Monkey 29" forks ๐Ÿ˜†


 
Posted : 31/12/2009 2:32 pm
Posts: 30656
Free Member
 

*shakes head at thread*


 
Posted : 31/12/2009 2:45 pm
Posts: 5121
Full Member
Topic starter
 

Now't ventured, now't gained Jamie

๐Ÿ˜†


 
Posted : 31/12/2009 2:59 pm
Posts: 66083
Full Member
 

Any particular reason for that fork?


 
Posted : 31/12/2009 6:45 pm
 Olly
Posts: 5260
Full Member
 

go for it, slackish angles will still make it a more stable bike at speed, and over the rough, woull just get battered around more.
not at all the same as a "normal" rigid bike.

dunno about length, but other wise, go for it.

praps even with a 29" front wheel to help it over things?


 
Posted : 31/12/2009 6:55 pm
Posts: 5121
Full Member
Topic starter
 

Any particular reason for that fork?

it's the axle to crown of around 470mm and it's a lot cheaper than the on-one. (which is also 470mm BTW)


 
Posted : 31/12/2009 7:32 pm