Arghhgahghghgg hghg...
 

[Closed] Arghhgahghghgg hghgh [arghhfrghghgafghg content]

Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

[img] [/img]

Qoroz Bikes: What a great looking frame.

??????????


 
Posted : 20/06/2011 12:11 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

bloody hell it's an early 90's Kirk magnesium resurected!


 
Posted : 20/06/2011 12:13 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Looks like a Kirk Revolution!

Edit: Beaten to it! I quite like it...


 
Posted : 20/06/2011 12:13 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

http://www.flickr.com/photos/cycleologist/432510568/

Can't get this to show for some reason...


 
Posted : 20/06/2011 12:14 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

Huh? That's not a Qoroz, that [i]is [/i]a Kirk, look at the components, nowt modern there.


 
Posted : 20/06/2011 12:14 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

How else are you going to carry that 5 litres of oil home?


 
Posted : 20/06/2011 12:15 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

We had a customer who regularly brought in a Kirk, truly horrible thing!


 
Posted : 20/06/2011 12:16 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Huh? That's not a Qoroz, that is a Kirk, look at the components, nowt modern there.

It was Qoroz bikes commenting on it on fb, it is a kirk. A precision first edition apparently. Hideous.

Also, now that the initial shock has worn off a little, bar angle?


 
Posted : 20/06/2011 12:17 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Did Kirk make road bikes?? I kind of like that, have always fancied adding a Kirk to my collection ๐Ÿ˜†


 
Posted : 20/06/2011 12:20 pm
Posts: 57275
Full Member
 

I've just been sick in my mouth


 
Posted : 20/06/2011 12:21 pm
Posts: 5938
Free Member
 

that saddle bag is way to small, you can only fit 24 inner tubes into it.


 
Posted : 20/06/2011 12:22 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Why is there a cordless vacuum cleaner on it?


 
Posted : 20/06/2011 12:29 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

It's no more hideous than a lot of current bikes festooned with garish colours and huge logos and stuff.


 
Posted : 20/06/2011 12:41 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I vaguely remember that there was a UK pro who road one back in the 90's, [i]very[/i] briefly.
A very rigid and unforgiving ride - you could ride over a postage stamp and tell whether it was 1st or 2nd class.


 
Posted : 20/06/2011 12:42 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I knew [u]psychlo[/u] would be interested ๐Ÿ˜€
Did you see the y-framed road bike on the US-bay?


 
Posted : 20/06/2011 12:43 pm
Posts: 19914
Free Member
 

you could ride over a postage stamp and tell whether it was 1st or 2nd class.

LOL! ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 20/06/2011 12:45 pm
Posts: 19914
Free Member
 

It's no more hideous than a lot of current bikes festooned with garish colours and huge logos and stuff

He has a point you know.


 
Posted : 20/06/2011 12:46 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

no he hasn't


 
Posted : 20/06/2011 12:59 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Half way down the uhhh....seat tube (I'll call it that, but not sure) there appears to be a lock of some kind?

Is it a lock or part of the [s]mecchano[/s] bike frame


 
Posted : 20/06/2011 1:50 pm
Posts: 16187
Free Member
 

It can't have been ridden much - or it would have snapped by now.


 
Posted : 20/06/2011 2:00 pm
Posts: 3853
Full Member
 

It's a lock. Someone is obviously worried about their fence getting nicked and used that "bike" as some ballast to hold it down.

Fugly bike and amazing to see an unbroken one.


 
Posted : 20/06/2011 2:00 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I used to have that exact same Campag lo-pro water bottle... Might still have it somewhere, it was pearlescent. Mmmmmm.


 
Posted : 20/06/2011 5:23 pm
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

i actually quite like that - i am being serious


 
Posted : 20/06/2011 5:49 pm
Posts: 25922
Full Member
 

so, is that the correct angle for a brooks then ? ooyah ! ๐Ÿ˜ฏ


 
Posted : 20/06/2011 6:20 pm
 D0NK
Posts: 592
Full Member
 

I had a Kirk MTB breifly, guess it was my first MTB (I did have a BSO "atb" before it) I liked it but nowt to compare it against. E-stay design quite a bit of give in it, certainly not harsh. Flexy and **** someone (who probably hadn't ridden one) at 6th form said.


 
Posted : 20/06/2011 6:57 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

He has a point you know.

no he hasn't

No I do look:

[img] [/img]

[img] [/img]

[img] [/img]

Gopping. Truly nasty. You'd think having spent all that money on R+D, they'd spend a few quid on getting someone with an actual sense of aesthetics to do the graphics.

Cooee bike companies! I'm cheap! ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 20/06/2011 7:11 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Gopping. Truly nasty. You'd think having spent all that money on R+D, they'd spend a few quid on getting someone with an actual sense of aesthetics to do the graphics.

Brief: We've built a bike that we believe to be the fastest available and it WILL win races. It's got lots of nice wide aero tube profiles, we'd like you to put our logo and corporate colours in as many places and a big as possible to reinforce our brand identity, because this baby is gonna get splashed across the front of all the cycling mags...

How exactly would you improve on that???


 
Posted : 21/06/2011 9:29 am
 D0NK
Posts: 592
Full Member
 

He didn't say those bikes don't do the job intended, he said they were gopping and he has a point


 
Posted : 21/06/2011 11:06 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

oh ok I take it back you do have a point, as a mountain biker I hadnt considered road bikes.


 
Posted : 21/06/2011 11:13 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

D0NK - Member

He didn't say those bikes don't do the job intended, he said they were gopping and he has a point

He said he could do a better job, I'm just wondering how.
I think they look ace, they do exactly what they're supposed to do very well...


 
Posted : 21/06/2011 11:15 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

He said he could do a better job, I'm just wondering how.

It woon't be difficult. TBH, most of the logos get lost in the mess of colours and stripes and that anyway.

I can understand that [i]you[/i] might not understand this, but anyone with a half-decent sense of aesthetics would. ๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 21/06/2011 11:22 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

My eyes, OH MY EYYYYYYEEESSS, IT HURRRRTTTTSSSSS


 
Posted : 21/06/2011 11:24 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

How exactly would you improve on that???

[img] http://billboards.typepad.com/.a/6a0120a5498222970c0120a5592054970c-pi [/img]

Simple, but effective.
Bit of a fail on the actual bike construction front though.


 
Posted : 21/06/2011 11:45 am
Posts: 54
Free Member
 

Had 2 Kirk MTBs, snapped them both at the steering tube ๐Ÿ™


 
Posted : 21/06/2011 11:47 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Elfinsafety - Member
I can understand that you might not understand this, but anyone with a half-decent sense of aesthetics would.

I suspect the brief put more emphasis on standing out like a sore thumb in magazines than being the suitable for using in pictures on the walls of babies' bedrooms.

I'd love to see your interpretation of the brief, given that you have such a refined sense of aesthetics... ๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 21/06/2011 12:06 pm
Posts: 27
Free Member
 

mmmmmmmagnesium
like :thumbup:


 
Posted : 21/06/2011 12:26 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

You can park your car on one or take the wheels off and use it as a Black and Decker Workmate.
http://forums.serotta.com/printthread.php?t=32112&pp=40


 
Posted : 21/06/2011 5:08 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Both the spesh and the scott look nice, considering that they are function first race machines, with logos all over.

I can understand that you might not understand this, but anyone with a half-decent sense of aesthetics would.

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 21/06/2011 5:13 pm
Posts: 620
Free Member
 

To the 'man in the street' or lads flicking through Shortlist those Specialized's and that Scott are gonna look amazing. The branding stands out amongst the paintwork and tube profiles and people are gonna see those and drool. I think Scott have done a sterling job combining the branding and also the corporate colours and graphics on that, although, like Elfin, I personally would prefer something a little more discreet but that is purely personal preference and I certainly couldn't come up with anything better myself if I had to fill that particular brief.
That Kirk though, christ. ๐Ÿ˜ฏ


 
Posted : 21/06/2011 6:07 pm
Posts: 5938
Free Member
 

I've seen that Scott tt bike up close and it is lovely. Something designed to go as fast as possible with no compromise. Brilliant bike, and good looking too. What task was the OPs bike designed to do best???


 
Posted : 21/06/2011 6:30 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Both the spesh and the scott look nice, considering that they are function first race machines, with logos all over.

The actual bikes are lovely; the graphics are gopping.

Anyway, bakacha:

[img] [/img]

Don't start giving it, sunshine. ๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 21/06/2011 7:03 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

There's clearly only one way to settle this.

www.hotornot.com

Anyway, I look good there, and you know it ๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 21/06/2011 7:07 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Heh!

๐Ÿ˜†

That's really quite disturbing, that site. ๐Ÿ˜ฏ

Anyway, I look good there, and you know it

You look gorgeous darling. ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 21/06/2011 7:09 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Fred, if I saw that staring back at me from the mirror every morning, I think I might have a rather distorted sense of aesthetics too... ๐Ÿ˜‰

Has anyone got any of that warping software where you can blend 2 photos together to find the perfect half-point? I just want to test a theory...

[img] http://images.pictureshunt.com/pics/p/pineapple-5535.jp g" target="_blank">http://images.pictureshunt.com/pics/p/pineapple-5535.jp g"/> [/img]


 
Posted : 22/06/2011 8:11 am
 D0NK
Posts: 592
Full Member
 

the mtb version didn't look quite as bad.[img] [/img]when I was 15 I thought it looked pretty cool.

(not mine, pic pilfered from retro bike)


 
Posted : 22/06/2011 9:12 am