anyone xc race with...
 

[Closed] anyone xc race with a Turner flux?

Posts: 3509
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Anyone raced a Turner flux? hows it compare to other FS race bikes you've raced.

100mm forks and light gear can easily see them low 20's weight wise.

frames around 5.5lb I think

http://forums.mtbr.com/turner/09-flux-dwl-setups-speccifications-453883.html


 
Posted : 09/02/2012 11:23 am
Posts: 54
Free Member
 

Hello
Not raced one but have seen a medium built with bling kit and the owner claimed it was 23 lbs.
Not confirmed but it was a lump lighter than mine-a large at 30lbs ๐Ÿ™

Cheers
Steve


 
Posted : 09/02/2012 2:29 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

Well if the frame weighs 5.5lbs you'd be able to get it to within 1.5lbs of the lightest FS bikes basically!

You'll see a bigger discrepancy between frames of the same size than you will a medium to a large, people get too hung up on that!


 
Posted : 09/02/2012 2:56 pm
Posts: 2597
Full Member
 

Mines around 25.5lbs with xtr kit and AM classic /stans wheels and light-ish tyres - including pedals.

Caveat for all the pedants: I haven't independently verified the accuracy of the scales, and the weight is just an estimation.


 
Posted : 09/02/2012 3:00 pm
Posts: 3509
Free Member
Topic starter
 

what do you reckon the elite FS race bikes weigh in at?


 
Posted : 09/02/2012 3:06 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

medium dw frame is 6lbs

mine is 25lbs with

Hope Pro 3-Stans Crests/Middleburn Duo chainset/XTR cassette-shifters-deraileurs/Thomson masterpiece seatpost/slr saddle/hope xc stem/controltech scandium risers/Look 4x4 pedals/SID Team 100mm forks/Maxxis Ignitor LUST 2.2/Avid BB7 brakes and ultimate levers/Gore rideon cables.

The brakes and pedals could be lighter, and maybe the cables could be lighter.

So I think it would be a bit of sweat to get it really light - but the suspension design is really efficient which probably would offset a lot of the weight.


 
Posted : 09/02/2012 3:42 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

what do you reckon the elite FS race bikes weigh in at?

Varies, some are incredibly light, some less so.

Christophe Sauser is very anal about weight, his 26" Epic was c19lbs. Others are less fussed, Adam Craig has been on QR15 forks for a couple of years, think his Anthem Advanced is about 22. There are Scalpels knocking around below 19lbs, they're about the lightest, but more like soft tails than true FS.

Edit: [url= http://www.bikeradar.com/news/article/pro-bike-adam-craigs-giant-anthem-x-advanced-sl-25368/ ]23.63lbs[/url] with single ring etc.


 
Posted : 09/02/2012 3:46 pm
Posts: 3509
Free Member
Topic starter
 

lets see a pic Turner guy ๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 09/02/2012 4:14 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

The brakes and pedals could be lighter, and maybe the cables could be lighter.

Everything on there [i]could [/i]be lighter ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 09/02/2012 4:17 pm
Posts: 1748
Free Member
 

I'd be replacing those:

Maxxis Ignitor LUST 2.2

Big, heavy and draggy, not to mention un-needed with Crests. Just get some 2.1 eXception series Ignitors ๐Ÿ™‚

PS. Do they even make a 2.2? Isn't it 2.1 or 2.3?


 
Posted : 09/02/2012 4:25 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

lets see a pic Turner guy

its on that mtbr page, near the end.

Just replacing the sids with some magura durins...


 
Posted : 09/02/2012 6:13 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Big, heavy and draggy

I meant 2.1 XC Ignitor Lusts:

http://www.chainreactioncycles.com/Models.aspx?ModelID=17346


 
Posted : 09/02/2012 6:16 pm
Posts: 1748
Free Member
 

I meant 2.1 XC Ignitor Lusts

Yep - that's a pound in weight you could save if you went to standard eXc versions...

Depends if you fancy thinner sidewalls, and are not the type of rider to bang against sharp things.

Still those LUSTs are 700g - which is pretty darn heavy for an XC tyre.


 
Posted : 09/02/2012 8:01 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Still those LUSTs are 700g - which is pretty darn heavy for an XC tyre.

you're not wrong - I just weighed one!

Still, they seem fine and with tubeless I think I prefer a little robustness and air retention - I just went out to the garage and the Bonty MudX's on there at the moment are flat ๐Ÿ™

Gives me a chance to test out my new Topeak Mountain pump which is supposed to shift enough air volume for tubeless inflation.


 
Posted : 09/02/2012 8:49 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Gives me a chance to test out my new Topeak Mountain pump which is supposed to shift enough air volume for tubeless inflation.

let us know if that works, stopped using tubeless because don't have garage nearby with compressor that fitted/worked


 
Posted : 09/02/2012 9:22 pm
Posts: 1748
Free Member
 

Turnerguy - may sound daft, but are you using sealant with your tyres?

I've found the bonty tyres required a couple of days of swashing the sealant around the tyre for them to seal fully, especially around the bead....

I'm on XR4s at the moment, as I'm enjoying hacking the bike downhill and chilling out on ascents, rather than storming about everywhere - so the thicker sidewalls and more grip is preferable to my bonkers light RoRos.


 
Posted : 10/02/2012 11:51 am
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

let us know if that works, stopped using tubeless because don't have garage nearby with compressor that fitted/worked

Choose your tyres better! I've got about 8 sets of tyres, two sets of wheels and a track pump, all work!


 
Posted : 10/02/2012 11:57 am
Posts: 3509
Free Member
Topic starter
 

got tubeless ready nobbys and have never had a problem in 1year.

(apart from a flat - but just put some new sealant in and bang fixed)!

for the first few weeks they'd lose pressure over a few few days but they seem fully sealed now

track pump did mine no worries too


 
Posted : 10/02/2012 12:04 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Turnerguy - may sound daft, but are you using sealant with your tyres?

yes - stans - but I haven't ridden that bike for a while (was trying to avoid dog incidents messing with my ski preperation) so maybe the length of time and cold have got to them.

The Ignitors go on with a normal track pump - the MudX's needed a CO2 cartridge.


 
Posted : 10/02/2012 12:43 pm
Posts: 27603
Free Member
 

got tubeless ready nobbys and have never had a problem in 1year.

(apart from a flat - but just put some new sealant in and bang fixed)!

for the first few weeks they'd lose pressure over a few few days but they seem fully sealed now

track pump did mine no worries too

+1 with Standard NN's Snakeskin with Stans rims/juice.


 
Posted : 10/02/2012 12:49 pm
Posts: 98
Free Member
 

Hi,
Yeah,did the Friday nite summer series last year on one.It a 2011 running Hope/Stans/Pro 3 ,Easton carbon kit and running 1x10.It is a large and last year weighed 23.5 lbs with XT gear.Recently put some XTR on so should be lighter.Will have to get some new photos up!
Thanx Max


 
Posted : 10/02/2012 1:21 pm
Posts: 3509
Free Member
Topic starter
 

thats really light!

what forks mate?


 
Posted : 10/02/2012 1:36 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Is that 23.5 with the pedals on? What pedals?


 
Posted : 10/02/2012 1:46 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

thats really light!

Not really. If you hung all the parts off my Fuel on a Flux it'd be about 21.5lbs, and you could go lighter!


 
Posted : 10/02/2012 2:35 pm
Posts: 3509
Free Member
Topic starter
 

thats light in my book ๐Ÿ˜†


 
Posted : 10/02/2012 2:38 pm
Posts: 98
Free Member
 

Fork's are Sid's.A lot of weight was lost with the Supersonic x Kings ran tubeless! Took a lot of patience to seal! Yeah,i think it is light enough!
[IMG] [/IMG]
Thanx Max


 
Posted : 10/02/2012 7:08 pm
Posts: 98
Free Member
 

As i said it now has XTR M980 cranks and rear mech.Will be ordering a Easton EC90 layback post soon too! Currently got mud rubber on so will post a picture of it again with the summer rubber on.
Thanx Max


 
Posted : 10/02/2012 7:11 pm
Posts: 98
Free Member
 

Sorry,its an XL! The pedals were Crank Brothers single Ti's when i weighed it.Favoured Candy SL,s recently though.
Thanx Max


 
Posted : 10/02/2012 7:15 pm