Forum menu
Another car/bike cr...
 

[Closed] Another car/bike crash. Who was at fault here?

Posts: 3394
Full Member
 

sbob yes you are right, best not to make yourself look stupid, but i'm affraid you've done the damage already.

if you read the post you'll see.... oh well.

white lines - overtaking, solid don't, broken do.
the pics show a broke line so they don't preclude overtaking.

still can't beat MSM thou. that is the most basic of all.


 
Posted : 12/02/2013 6:43 pm
Posts: 36
Free Member
 

That's in 130,000 miles.

Ive been driving for over 20 years, probably about 250,000+ miles, cycled in London every week for the last 15 years and had.....0 incidents, 0 points.
But then Im super. ๐Ÿ˜€

*frantically touches wood now*


 
Posted : 12/02/2013 6:48 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

My inner raging biker would have wanted to storm down the outside of the line of traffic as you did... sooo satisfying.

But experience (sounds like you have had more experience than me) should have made you take the reasonable course of losing 30 seconds off your journey time and not falling victim to the 'expected' side swipe.

Whilst out on a bike I try to think like a lazy, fat, distracted, agressive motorist whenever I can. Also sometimes 'would I do this in a car or on a a motorbike?' helps too...

Sorry if it doesn't sound very sympathetic, glad you're not badly hurt.

#couldbedead


 
Posted : 12/02/2013 6:56 pm
Posts: 28593
Free Member
 

*frantically touches wood now*

You're taking the self-congratulation a tad too far with that.


 
Posted : 12/02/2013 7:01 pm
 sbob
Posts: 5581
Free Member
 

Speshpaul - Member

sbob yes you are right, best not to make yourself look stupid, but i'm affraid you've done the damage already.

if you read the post you'll see.... oh well.

white lines - overtaking, solid don't, broken do.
the pics show a broke line so they don't preclude overtaking.

still can't beat MSM thou. that is the most basic of all.

You are spectacularly missing the point.
The problem highlighted was one of attitude, which you exhibit again, in the above quote.
I'll have another go at explaining it:
What does a 30 sign mean?


 
Posted : 12/02/2013 7:35 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Upshot seems to be that the OP was in the wrong.

http://www.access-legal.co.uk/legal-news/accidents-involving-filtering-what-the-law-says-lu-2811.htm

When the most recent case quoted is the well know A40 u-turn one in which the motorist was found to be completely to blame, how do you work that one out? Whilst that article mentions a variety of cases, I'd suggest the conclusions are wrong - those cases where the filtering rider was held largely to blame were a long time ago, since when the law has moved on to considering motorists emerging from junctions to be at fault if they hit a filtering bike even if they are flashed out by another driver. If we're arguing legal liability the A40 case is extremely relevant - that laid the blame totally on the motorist (though this case is slightly different, so the same conclusion might not be reached) http://www.claimssolicitoruk.co.uk/injury-claim-success-stories/motorcycle-filtering-legitimised.php

I still lay some of the blame on the OP, however that does not absolve the driver from being mostly responsible.


 
Posted : 12/02/2013 8:36 pm
Posts: 823
Free Member
 

Reverse this accident, you're at the front of the queue on your bike and have indicated as you slow down. Drivers behind you have seen this and stopped so you've returned your hands to the handlebars to move off. Car a few behind doesn't see you indicate and overtakes. Wipes you out as you turn right. Would you blame yourself for not checking in this situation or the driver for overtaking? The one overtaking every time.

When turning right the indicator should be on, but it could just have packed in, it could have just self cancelled, it could have been smashed by the last cyclist who hit him. The driver should have looked behind, but whether on a car or bike when turning across oncoming traffic your attention is going to mostly be forward.

I strongly suspect if this had been much less fortunate and the police did get involved and appoint blame the driver would have got a very small part of it.

Stay safe and hope you have a less incident packed trip tomorrow ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 12/02/2013 11:15 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

OP utterly nuts IMO. Unfortunately, I have done same myself...human nature, innit.


 
Posted : 12/02/2013 11:22 pm
Posts: 806
Free Member
 

Regardless of the legalities, my logic. has always been to never overtake, undertake or squeeze through slow moving/stationary traffic. The law and my legal rights are completely irrelevant to me if I end up dead, brain damaged or crippled.

Wait 2 minutes in the queue. Ride as if you are driving, I.e. think of car size gaps. If you wouldn't do a manouvre in a 1 ton safety cage, then definitely don't do it on a bike.......


 
Posted : 13/02/2013 8:48 am
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

OP is clearly at fault. If you are overtaking you are taking responsibility for the consequences.

So I am with PetePoddy on this.


 
Posted : 13/02/2013 9:07 am
Posts: 54
Free Member
 

Glad to know you are ok, I don't understand why it is considered par for the course
1) to overtake in a junction
2) or change lanes in a junction

(I moved here from North America and it is a big NO-NO....)

However as someone said car drivers don't tend to look in their mirrors at such places( I often am guilty of the same when I am suddenly startled by a motorbike that comes hurtling down the side in standstillor crawling traffic.

Still glad to know it ended amicably... hope your shoulder heals fast


 
Posted : 13/02/2013 10:17 am
Posts: 8753
Full Member
 

Driver should have been indicating but you've got to be mental/have a deathwish to filter on the outside approaching a junction with a right-hand turn.


 
Posted : 13/02/2013 10:26 am
Page 2 / 2