Altura winter cruis...
 

[Closed] Altura winter cruisers Vs Ron Hill Bikester DXB

Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

to wear under shorts for warmth and without the look of chicken legs

which is best and why?


 
Posted : 05/12/2009 8:53 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

If you're going to wear something like Ronhills - why put shorts over them?
Surely you'd be better off with Lycra under them?


 
Posted : 05/12/2009 9:00 am
Posts: 6581
Free Member
 

You'll look daft either way.


 
Posted : 05/12/2009 9:07 am
Posts: 24778
Free Member
 

just accept it, proper bibtights are perfect for winter, whether they look good or not.


 
Posted : 05/12/2009 9:14 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

NOT A ****ING CHANCE


 
Posted : 05/12/2009 2:44 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

so cruisers or ron hills - which ftw?


 
Posted : 05/12/2009 8:16 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Is this for your [road] hill interval training?

Anyway, just get either - it wont make any difference


 
Posted : 05/12/2009 8:19 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

no its for wearing so i stay warm and dry on normal mtb rides. How is it either when the alturas are fleece lined - are they not a warmer alternative?


 
Posted : 05/12/2009 8:23 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Have you got a Marin + beard ? ๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 05/12/2009 8:26 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I've never had cold legs regardless of what I've been wearing on them - i.e. thin bib tights work OK, as do fleecy lined keks


 
Posted : 05/12/2009 8:26 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

i have never had cold legs but i am sure warmer legs = warmer feet, therefore that is why i want some trousers


 
Posted : 05/12/2009 8:31 pm