Forum menu
142x12 conversion o...
 

[Closed] 142x12 conversion on a Yeti ASR5 - is it worth doing ?

Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#6713525]

Hello STW
As the list title says.... Thinking of converting my ASR5 to 142x12 at the back, (can't afford the new SB5c without selling at least a kidney) but is it worth doing?

Thanks in anticipation


 
Posted : 17/12/2014 9:21 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Bump......
Any experiences or advice?


 
Posted : 18/12/2014 12:24 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Just doing it at the moment so will tell you in 2 or 3 weeks.


 
Posted : 18/12/2014 12:29 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yes definitely, makes a difference.


 
Posted : 18/12/2014 1:41 am
Posts: 52609
Free Member
 

I find it much simpler on all the 142x12 bikes I own to use than qr.


 
Posted : 18/12/2014 4:16 am
Posts: 48
Full Member
 

Definitely worth it


 
Posted : 18/12/2014 7:34 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Well worth doing, I've got a full chip kit in my spares box. Used but all in good working order. Could do you a deal on it if you fancy?


 
Posted : 18/12/2014 8:18 am
Posts: 2884
Free Member
 

robbonzo - Member
Yes definitely, makes a difference.

How and why?


 
Posted : 18/12/2014 8:28 am
Posts: 2884
Free Member
 

Spikey, I'm definitely interested in the chip kit - does it include the maxle/skewer & how much do you want?


 
Posted : 18/12/2014 8:30 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yep has shimano axle. There £83 on yetifan. Wat about £40
Posted. Give me your email address if your interested and can sort
Something out. Cheers.


 
Posted : 18/12/2014 8:53 am
Posts: 2884
Free Member
 

mark2404 AT icloud DOT com


 
Posted : 18/12/2014 9:56 am
Posts: 6859
Free Member
 

I've got it on my ASR5, but no real experience without it for a fair comparison. It seems nice and stiff though, and as above it's much easier / more convenient.

I doubt it's really a game-changing upgrade though, and at £83, I'd put the money towards something else, personally. For £40 you might as well.


 
Posted : 18/12/2014 10:06 am
Posts: 77
Free Member
 

I went for the bolt through option when my rear triangle failed (a couple of years ago now) with a QR installed. My personal thoughts (and could well be totally wrong) is that with the QR there is more stress put on the hanger/rear triangle joint, so by using the bolt through there is less twisting movement thus load. UK distributor have been great and replaced my rear triangle within a few days and I havent had any probs since. Also find with bolt through the dropouts dont need as much fettling.


 
Posted : 18/12/2014 10:22 am
Posts: 1611
Full Member
 

Converted my carbon-ended 575 to 142x12 and can't say I noticed much of a difference. Wheel better secured perhaps. Money better spent on getting the RP23 Pushed in my case.


 
Posted : 18/12/2014 12:20 pm
Posts: 7630
Free Member
 

Has anyone genuinely ever noticed the difference between a QR back end and a Maxle on anything other than an Orange Five (and I ran one of those with a QR and couldn't give less of a chuff about it).


 
Posted : 18/12/2014 12:24 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

I noticed it was stiffer with the bigger axle but I'm over 13 stone. It isn't essential anyway.


 
Posted : 18/12/2014 12:28 pm
Posts: 1059
 

Spikey - if Mildred changes their mind, can I have that kit?


 
Posted : 18/12/2014 12:30 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Mildred YGM

Justin yep no worries.


 
Posted : 18/12/2014 1:47 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yeah I wouldn't say it's 'essential' but I did notice a difference with the chip lot installed. Just a touch more solid and stiff.


 
Posted : 18/12/2014 11:13 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

It definitely makes a difference. Well worth it I'd say.


 
Posted : 18/12/2014 11:49 pm
Posts: 3676
Full Member
 

I'm only 10-and-a-bit stone and I'd say it was worth it, I noticed a real difference in the rear end stiffness. Granted, when I changed from QR to 142x12 I also changed wheels, but they were both a similar spec, conventional (no carbon or fat spokes) wheels.


 
Posted : 18/12/2014 11:58 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Thanks everyone - seems I was too slow to get the used chipset and axle.

Is Yetifan my best bet for the kit, or is it cheaper we elsewhere?


 
Posted : 19/12/2014 12:56 am
Posts: 2884
Free Member
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Just puzzled how this new found 'stiffness' manifests itself, considering you've got a 26 -29" flexible disc and about 2.5" of squidgy rubber between the axle and the ground?

I'm suspicious this is another of those 'benefits' invented by the marketing guys that we persuade ourselves we can notice - like stiffer cranks, better Q factor, reduced seal stiction... 😀

Now, ease of re-fitting a wheel and getting it in exactly the right place so you don't have to adjust the brakes - that's a benefit I can appreciate!


 
Posted : 19/12/2014 1:44 pm
Posts: 718
Free Member
 

Variflex - what do you mean that dropouts don't need as much fettling?


 
Posted : 22/12/2014 12:24 am
Posts: 6859
Free Member
 

Just puzzled how this new found 'stiffness' manifests itself, considering you've got a 26 -29" flexible disc and about 2.5" of squidgy rubber between the axle and the ground?

I'm suspicious this is another of those 'benefits' invented by the marketing guys that we persuade ourselves we can notice - like stiffer cranks, better Q factor, reduced seal stiction...

If you ever go from a very flexy frame to a pretty stiff one, you can definitely notice less twang in the rear end of the bike. I.e. it goes where you point it slightly more accurately. Whether that's enough to give you a real-world speed increase probably depends on loads of factors especially confidence level.

It's one of those things like posh dampers, good coffee and expensive hifis that you can train yourself into understanding, and you forever [i]need[/i] to spend more money on.


 
Posted : 22/12/2014 1:50 am