Singletrack Podcast: What’s the point of bike tests?

by 5

For this episode, it was a question from a reader that sparked the conversation: they wanted to know ‘why don’t we test bikes to see which is the fastest?’. Hannah, Mark and Chipps navigate their way through this question, plus a whole pile of tangental bits of science, conjecture and anecdote. Could we figure out which bike is fastest? Is fastest bestest? What is the point of a bike test, or any product review, and is it all just marketing anyway?

Give this episode a listen, and if you’ve got things you’d like us to discuss, drop them in the comments. We can’t promise definitive answers, but we’ll likely have some interesting perspectives to debate!

Subscribe to
Singletrack Magazine MTB Podcast

Or subscribe with your favorite app by using the address below


Singletrack Merch

Beate Kubitz Classic Ride Print #98 Glen Sligachan

A classic picture, from our Classic Ride feature, mounted and ready to be framed. Gemma and Andy riding Glen Sligachan Limited edition giclée print Edition: 50 Print size: 16 x…

Singletrack Sponsored Features

Scottish Stag-Do – A YT Izzo UK Adventure

Amanda sets out to bag some Scottish Munros, returning instead with epic memories, incredible experiences and more than a few bruises. In association with… YT INDUSTRIES Words Amanda Photography Pete…

WildBike MTB Holidays

WildBike is all about rocks and summits and flow and wildness. And cake. Amid the most stunning scenery in the UK and further afield. WildBike was established in 2011 and…

Singletrack Full MembershipJoin us

If you like what we do - if you like our independence then the best way to support us is by joining us. Every penny of your membership goes back into Singletrack to pay the bills and the wages of the people who work here. No shareholders to pay, just the people who create the content you love to read and watch.


Comments (5)

    I found that podcast satisfactory. 😉

    I don’t normally listen to podcasts but I found this an interesting and honest discussion.

    I agree that if the reviewer loves 100mm bikes and is testing a DH bike then they have to put themselves in the shoes of a downhiller, and comment from that person’s perspective. I do think though that it is possible to comment on quality. Is the carbon frame from X better finished on the inside than the one from Y? And are the suspension bearings much better protected? That said, I sold bike X and bought bike Y and it’s a lot more fun to ride!

    One final thought; another site includes “recommended upgrades” in their tests. That seems to tell me a lot about the bike’s major weakness, and something about likely cost of ownership.

    Anyway, Happy Birthday!

    I suppose if you want “Clarkson” style bike tests there’s always GCN/GMBN…

    I think any (journalistic/consumer) test/comparison, should really come with a clear introduction where the use case the tester(s) had in mind is laid out.

    e.g. were you comparing ~130mm travel “Trail bikes” with aspiring #Enduroists or typical weekend warriors in mind?

    But yep I’m interested in people’s qualitative opinion and I would like that opinion from someone with some experience of other bikes, but not necessarily a racer.

    I wonder if it’s worth getting testers to fill out a pre-test questionnaire having only had sight of the marketing blurb: Who/what they think it’s aimed at, do they think any claims made are a bit dubious?
    Try and get them to acknowledge (and get past) any bias they might have. you may already do that, does it result in a more objective test?

    The recommended upgrades idea I like a lot. I shall make sure we discuss that.

Leave Reply