Well the 10year old version of me would pick the typhoon. But that’s only because I remember my fighter planes book and my favourite back then was the Saab Viggen. The typhoon has a passing resemblance to the viggen in that it is also a delta.
Yes, I’ll take one of those, please.
As a child >9 , I lived opposite a scrapyard which had a Lightning cockpit and fuselage section. Owner was ok with us climbing in, taking off and saving the world.
I used to know someone who had one. As far as I recall it was no longer required and it was just a case of take it off our hands please. It was back in the 70’s when it was all rather different. He had some other plane he acquired as well though I can’t recall what that was. He also had an impressive collection of WWII parts he’d dug up as well. I was most impressed by the Spitfire gun sight he had. My dad told me a few years later he’d also shown him a .5 Browning he had stashed at the back of a barn.
Aesthetically I’m not a huge fan of the F-35 (odd proportions) or the Typhoon (mainly the low wing and the air intake I think). On that basis my favourite RAF fighter from my lifetime may be the Jaguar:
Otherwise, PJM1974 made the most relevant point:
Depends what you want to do with them?
For out and out speed the Typhoon wins and it’d probably also win for air superiority. For air to ground it’s closer and would go in the Lightning II’s favour if there’s an appreciable SAM threat or similar.
The F-35 should be more future proof, but will still no doubt have plenty of teething problems to iron out. And if you need STOVL (or any sort of carrier capability) then the Typhoon is out of the running immediately.
Come you masters of war
You that build all the guns
You that build the death planes
You that build all the bombs
You that hide behind walls
You that hide behind desks
I just want you to know
I can see through your masks