True, they are good – granted. At the top end. But they are not as fast as men up the hills. The ‘chart’ is wrong. They have not got the watts/kg of men – only up to a a cat 1/2 level I’d say. If you stuck lizzie armistad in with a a bunch of cat 1/2’s I think that she may hang on in the climbs, but in in the pro ranks – not a chance.
Just an observation, on where they stand and the ideas as to the reasons why, smaller lungs, hearts etc? Just curious as when you look at Paula Radcliffe, she’s not far off the men, but women road riders are a big chunk lower. Just wondering why, tis all.