• This topic has 30 replies, 19 voices, and was last updated 13 years ago by br.
Viewing 31 posts - 1 through 31 (of 31 total)
  • why didn't MTB tyre & rim manufacurers go down the TUBs route for MTB tubeless ?
  • qwerty
    Free Member

    i accept it would require dedicated rims

    would it be better?

    [sits back] slurps tea [/sits back]

    ourmaninthenorth
    Full Member

    Dunno. Would they be more likely to roll off the rims than road-sized tubs?

    Sam
    Full Member

    You can get MTB tubulars, if that’s what you mean by ‘TUBs’

    [img]http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4136/4909632649_d06a35b1bc.jpg[/img]

    They roll very fast, offer great grip and allow you to use very light rims, but in case of puncture you are pretty much screwed. I guess that’s why they don’t really get used outside of racing.

    ourmaninthenorth
    Full Member

    Ooh. Those Dugasts are rather lovely.

    ac282
    Full Member

    And rims
    http://www.wheelbuilder.com/store/edge-composites-26-xc-tubular-mtb-rim.html

    They are light but expensive and hard to fix on the trail.

    cynic-al
    Free Member

    It was tried out in the early 90s too IIRC (& bombed).

    FuzzyWuzzy
    Full Member

    As you say probably a lot to do with requiring a big change in rims rather than allowing people a ghetto option. Tyres would likely cost more and they’re more of a pain to repair. I’m assuming you’re talking about tubs with sealant in them to? If so if would depend on how long the sealant lasts, would need to be a long time for most people as presumably you couldn’t replace the sealant so would be new tub time.

    qwerty
    Free Member

    cool

    ok, so they are available – all be it in bling format

    whats the pro’s / cons against tubeless

    and why hasn’t the industry taken this path mainstream?

    shaggy
    Full Member

    Just this second I emailed Chipps a review of the Reynolds MNT-T wheels for the next issue:-)

    Tubs are available for CX aren’t they ?
    It wouldn’t be too much of a leap of technology to go from a heavyweight, wide CX rim & tyre to a lightweight, narrow 29er XC rim & tyre.

    ourmaninthenorth
    Full Member

    and why hasn’t the industry taken this path mainstream?

    They’re not *that* mainstream in the world of roadbikes, really only finding themselves on race bikes. I certainly would ride tubs on a training ride – easier to change a tube than put a spare tub on.

    aP
    Free Member

    I rode on Sunday over “those 3 hills” on tubs. No punctures, plenty of grip and feel – shame I’m not very fast. I used Tufo Flexus Cubus tubs with one scoop of Stans in each on Ambrosio Nemesis rims on Record hubs. The wheels are noticeably lighter than the Neutrons with Crossblasters I used last year.
    Tufo make 26″ tubs for mtb so it’s quite do-able.

    Sam
    Full Member

    Tufo, Dugast, Geax, FMB, Challenge. Plus I’ve seen prototypes from Schwalbe and Continental. They are definitely becoming more popular.

    shortcut
    Full Member

    Tubs are pretty old had. Been around for years on the road and fell out of favour in the early 80’s. Because people had to carry spare tyres around. they were messy to repair (lots of sticky tape or glue.

    They are expensive to repair (needing a needle and thread).

    If the tub rolls off the rim it hurts on tarmac and isn’t much better for off road.

    I can think of 2 good reasons to have them – weight (negated by need to carry a couple of spare tyres) and rolling sweetly.

    Punctures, rolloff, messy, expensive, impractical are the reasons not to bother.

    nickc
    Full Member

    I thought the ‘evidence’ for them rolling faster was mostly heresay anyway.

    Sam
    Full Member

    nickc – Member
    I thought the ‘evidence’ for them rolling faster was mostly heresay anyway.

    Depends what you are comparing. On a like for like comparison across modern road tyres it’s true there is little difference, and there is also a constant effect of glue increasing rolling resistance. However high thread count clincher mtb tyres simply don’t exist. The highest TPI I’ve ever seen for an MTB tyre is 120. Most tubless rated tyres are 60. Tubulars are usually around 300. This does make a noticeable difference. To the best of my knowledge no empirical test has be done comparing rolling resistance over rough terrain between tubeless mtb tyres and tubulars. However my personal experience on a subjective level is that they feel noticeably faster.

    ac282
    Full Member

    Tubs didn’t do too well at the worlds this year though. Lots of top names punctured.

    leggyblonde
    Free Member

    A well glued tub won’t roll off a rim. My aching thumbs on saturday after spending an hour removing 2 cyclocross tubs can attest to this….

    In fact, one of the reasons cyclocross riders and trackies use tubs is that the tub stays stuck to the rim in the event of a puncture and is rideable just enough to get you out of trouble. It is almost impossible to ride a punctured clincher as the bead flops out so you are more likely to crash with a blowout

    matthewlhome
    Free Member

    perhaps because MTBers like to change their tyres a lot? Having to re glue tubs every week because the conditions have changed is not going to be fun.

    It will be interesting to see how well road tubeless takes off in the next few years. The tubeless system seems to be the best compromise of ease of use and puncture resistance etc.

    For comparison, how many cars on the roads run tubs and how many are on the equivalent of UST? (i must admit i know nothing about motorbikes though, which would be the best comparison)

    fontmoss
    Free Member

    anyone using a reflec tub rim offroad? set of hubs im interested in are attached to reflex rims and initially I said i just wanted the hubs but now im kind of tempted to try them (guy has grifo tyres too)

    leggyblonde
    Free Member

    fontmoss, for CX? they’re great and very popular

    LS
    Free Member

    Reflex rims are fine offroad. I use 28s for racing with no bother.

    fontmoss
    Free Member

    ok now im properly tempted 🙂

    Sam
    Full Member

    Do NOT use Reflex rims with MTB tubulars – anyone got that pic from SSEC?

    fontmoss
    Free Member

    it’d be grifos – i remember seeing your wheel at SSEC, was that a reflex?

    Northwind
    Full Member

    matthewlhome – Member

    “Perhaps because MTBers like to change their tyres a lot? Having to re glue tubs every week because the conditions have changed is not going to be fun.”

    Makes sense, even changing with tubeless is enough of a pain in the baws.

    skidsareforkids
    Free Member

    Bontrager are working on a system too apparently…

    Sam
    Full Member

    it’d be grifos – i remember seeing your wheel at SSEC, was that a reflex?

    Yep…

    Billy-Whenman
    Free Member

    does any one want to buy some TUBULAR mtb wheels ?? im selling a brand new set of Reynolds, carbon fibre tub wheels….never used still in the box….2010 model ?

    £1100 in shops. i want £550 o.n.o..

    07530192197

    billy whenman

    whyte racing

    cynic-al
    Free Member

    try the classifieds.

    br
    Free Member

    For comparison, how many cars on the roads run tubs and how many are on the equivalent of UST? (i must admit i know nothing about motorbikes though, which would be the best comparison)

    The vast majority of motorbikes are ‘UST’, with only some off-road and/or little ones running tubes.

Viewing 31 posts - 1 through 31 (of 31 total)

The topic ‘why didn't MTB tyre & rim manufacurers go down the TUBs route for MTB tubeless ?’ is closed to new replies.