This is a perennial STW hot potato. We’re all a bunch of armchair experts on the subject, I wonder how many of us on here have a degree in particle physics or thermodynamics. I haven’t.
What I do understand is that nuclear power is a partial solution at best. Although it hasn’t killed anywhere near as many people as the hysteria would suggest, there’s a lot of distrust there because it’s seen as almost a dark science. We perhaps need to get over ourselves and discuss the safety features built into modern reactors. Before anyone says “Fukushima” or “Chernobyl” to me, we should remember that the Suffolk coast where they plan to build Sizewell C is not currently at risk of earthquake tsunamis and that the COMECON plants of the Chernobyl design lacked a great many rudimentary safety features of even 1960s western reactors. Like a containment roof over the reactor for example.
TJ has raised an excellent point – nuclear stations can’t be cranked up to eleven on a whim.
We needn’t be scared of new technology, I have high hopes that we’ll make thorium reactors feasible and perhaps one day fusion will be a reality. However, none of these technologies can be built en masse within fifteen years to replace fossil fuels without requiring a significant investment of fossil fuel energy as an overlap. To leave it to the last minute would be an unmitigated disaster.
Right, I’m off to gen up on my GCSE notes.