My mate bought some Fox 36 RC2 and found they blew through the travel too easily…
I’ve had an RC2 on my SX Trail for two seasons and haven’t had any issues. It took me a while to balance all the adjustments (high-speed & low-speed compression and rebound) and I found that the fork works better with a few PSI less air than Fox recommend (same with all Foxes, methinks). I still feel that the fork could do with less brake dive, but in terms of travel from hits it’s very nice indeed. If somebody was blowing through on an RC2, I’d look at set-up and technique before I condemned the fork.
I’ve had an ’11 RLC (which is what carbon337 was actually referring to) on my Orange SubZero for a few weeks now. It’s less sensitive to dive than the RC2 (at the same PSI) and I don’t miss the high-speed compression adjustment. I only use a couple of clicks of low-speed compression, three or four of rebound (if I remember correctly) and the fork is a pleasure to ride. Tracks beautifully and is, dare I say it, coil-like in its plushness.
I came to it from an ’07 Marzocchi 66 RC2X (on the Orange) and I am entirely satisfied. The RC2X was a hard act to follow and I even refrained from selling it until I’d had some time on the RLC. The RC2X is now bolted to somebody’s bike in Germany and the front of my SubZero is at least as plush and, like my wallet, is now considerably lighter!