Stumpyjon wrote, "In the meantime I personally haven't seen any improvement in public services or the NHS and as we all know our society is in a mess."
What people fail to- or don't want to- understand about the NHS is that modern medicine is more expensive than 1970s medicine. The most expensive thing a hospital can ever do is keep someone alive, which they do more of now than ever before. Increased life expectancy, better cancer treatments, better disease treatments, all staggeringly expensive. Yet people look at waiting lists as if they're a sane way to judge the success of a health system. If you keep a cancer patient alive for another year, you don't get any impressive stats to present, in fact you get a longer waiting list than you would have had they just died. If you offer a treatment that you couldn't have last year, the same applies.
I feel a bit personally about this, since the only reason I can ride a bike is because the NHS rebuilt my leg using a cutting edge treatment which wouldn't have been available 5 years before, and which wouldn't have been paid for by most private insurance. I've seen some numbers and it cost about 5 times more than the traditional treatment on the day of surgery (not to mention the higher cost of training) and the post-op care ran to about 10 times more one-on-one physio than the prognosis for the older treatments would have justified.
But, to the headline writers and knee-jerkers, all that looks like is a longer waiting list, since if I'd got the older, inferior treatment they could have seen 10 more patients in the same time. They never get to say "Look, this guy can ride a bike and run for a bus- we did that."