Yet the big story is the nuclear plant…..
That’s because the nuclear plant is an ongoing story – the earthquake and tsunami were last week’s stories…..that’s how news works.
The other reason a story makes the headlines is how “expected” it is. Everyone, to an extent, expects earthquakes in Japan. An earthquake half the magnitude in Paris, would have got much more coverage – no one expects earthquakes in Paris…….that’s how news works. The same goes for tsunamis, which unsurprisingly, is a Japanese word.
Contrast that, to the fact that no expects nuclear power stations to go tits up…..what do you expect to make the news headlines ?
The other thing which concerns people, again unsurprisingly, is how much a news story effects them, eg, 60 people getting blown up by a suicide bomber in Baghdad will not get anywhere near the same coverage as 6 people getting blown up by a suicide bomber in London will get.
Yeah, sure, many have died due to the earthquake/tsunami story, but the nuclear story is more likely to affect people in Britain who feel unsure whether or not nuclear power is a good idea – they can’t do much about earthquakes or tsunamis, but they can oppose or support nuclear energy. There’s a perceived “need to know” element. Which is basically why you are so interested in the story aracer.
News provision might not always seem very “fair”, but the sheer quantity available means that individuals need to ration what they take in. And they also need to emotionally detached themselves to an extent, from a great deal of the more horrific tragedies – submerging yourself in sorrow and preoccupation does not necessarily help the victims or yourself.