- This topic has 108 replies, 63 voices, and was last updated 6 years ago by kimbers.
-
This 'critical threat' stuff
-
jambalayaFree Member
During the height of the”Troubles” and the IRAs campaign of murder Corbyn supoorted their objectives of a united Ireland and the withdrawl of British Troops as well as meeting senior members of Sinn Fein (and now known to be IRA terrorists). That’s consistent with him today supporting the creation of an Islamic State in Syria and Iraq (the Levant) and the end of military action against IS as well as inviting them to Westminster. That is before we get onto his legitimatisation of terrorist groups like Hezbollah amd Hamas.
Corbyn absolutely deserves every sentence of critism he is receiving over being a terrorist sympathiser. I posted right at the beginning of TeamHurmore’s Corbyn thread that these links would come to the fore during any election campaign.
JunkyardFree MemberI prefer it when you just bang on incessantly about how the EU is about to explode and Greece will kill the EZ rather than murder this point to death
I realise engaging your diatribes with facts is a futile but we have all heard it right from the start and no one is biting here
Use it on the hard of thinking will you as they might just buy your non fact s nonsenseEven a broken clock is correct twice a day and it outperforms you twice a day
kerleyFree MemberI posted right at the beginning of TeamHurmore’s Corbyn thread that these links would come to the fore during any election campaign.
Well, done. You predicted that the right wing media would make up crap on Corbyn to help the tories win.
The sad thing is you seem to be believing it.DrJFull Memberjamba hitting the cocktail cabinet a bit early today – usually he waits till around lunchtime.
bikebouyFree MemberJunkyard – lazarus
I prefer it when you just bang on incessantly about how the EU is about to explode and Greece will kill the EZ rather than murder this point to death
I realise engaging your diatribes with facts is a futile but we have all heard it right from the start and no one is biting here
Use it on the hard of thinking will you as they might just buy your non fact s nonsenseEven a broken clock is correct twice a day and it outperforms you twice a day
Agree with that.
DrJ – Member
jamba hitting the cocktail cabinet a bit early today – usually he waits till around lunchtime.POSTED 3 MINUTES AGO # REPORT-POST
And that.
kimbersFull Membermefty – Member
The Sun’s first edition on Tuesday indeed did lead with a story about Corbyn – but this was because they are not clairvoyant it was published before the bomb exploded.The Sun should be boycotted for the story, (did they also have it on their website, and remove it promptly?) seeing as the source for it is a self confessed liar who has admitted, in court, to making up stories to the (Murdoch) press before and taking money for it
he also claimed to have single handedly saved charles and diana from being blown up (His garda handlers didnt nelieve hime either)
the guy is a serial liar
you bet Theresa May has canned Levenson part 2 and the Tabloids continue to spread lies
We are in this shit in part thanks to Tony Blairs Sun & Tory backed invasion of Iraq
&
Camerons disastrous intervention in Libya (backed again by a tumescent Sun)and we are now told that the police were warned multiple times about the manchester bomber, weve now got the armny in the streets
if only the police had tried to warn us that cutting their numbers would affect our safety …..And our
Weak & WobblyStrong & Stable home secretary accused them of ‘crying wolf’[video]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t5pSoe_VoHE[/video]
grumpyscullerFree MemberAnd now we have people claiming it was a false flag attack organised by the Tories. After seeing this thread, I wondered if that idea would come up. SNP supporters on twitter do not disappoint.
kimbersFull Membergrumpysculler – Member
And now we have people claiming it was a false flag attack organised by the Tories.i think thats Alex Jones level of tinfoil hattery there!
epicycloFull Membergrumpysculler – Member
And now we have people claiming it was a false flag attack organised by the Tories. After seeing this thread, I wondered if that idea would come up. SNP supporters on twitter do not disappoint.Really? I doubt there would more of them saying that than there would be in the rest of the tinfoil community, but you could see how its convenient timing would lead them to think this.
However a bit of thought is all that’s needed to dismiss the likelihood of a young muslim extremist agreeing to blow himself up to assist in the election of who he sees as his enemy’s leader.
The sheer horror of children being targeted has brought home to many the realisation that this is what our govt’s bombing is doing daily to children in the middle east. Just imagine a Manchester every day. How can you multiply horrendous?
pictonroadFull Member2nd page of this thread is a brilliant post by Wobbliscott.
It will get lost in the morass but if you missed it and you’re reading this, go back and read it.
kimbersFull Memberpictonroad – Member
2nd page of this thread is a brilliant post by Wobbliscott.it was very good, though i didnt agree entirely with his comments re Saudi etc
gobuchulFree MemberDuring the height of the”Troubles” and the IRAs campaign of murder Corbyn supoorted their objectives of a united Ireland and the withdrawl of British Troops as well as meeting senior members of Sinn Fein (and now known to be IRA terrorists). That’s consistent with him today supporting the creation of an Islamic State in Syria and Iraq (the Levant) and the end of military action against IS as well as inviting them to Westminster
That’s consistent with complete and utter bollocks.
How does a Democratic United Ireland compare with a fascist, murdering death cult?
nickcFull MemberFrance has seen 5000 troops on its streets.
…And mass arrests of Muslims, and possible human rights abuses
https://www.hrw.org/news/2016/02/03/france-abuses-under-state-emergency
I don’t want “collective” punishment on my streets, thanks
FunkyDuncFree MemberLate to this party but:
He couldn’t have built a bomb in isolation so valid concern that another attack possible until all caught.
The NHS is getting preparedness to a level I haven’t seen before, even after 9/11 or 7/11.
The bringing of troops in I read to mean, we have got rid of that many Police we are now too pushed and need the army in to take up the shortfall
epicycloFull MemberFunkyDunc – Member
Late to this party but:He couldn’t have built a bomb in isolation so valid concern that another attack possible until all caught.
Agree. These days the difficult bit would be getting hold of the explosives. A trip to Libya probably sorted that.
A timer and detonation device would be quite simple. With modern technology you can buy for £5 a quite sophisticated wee computer in the guise of a Raspberry Pi Zero or similar, and it’s really like electronic Lego. Just a few add on boards and you’re set.
However I’m sure UKIP’s suggestion of a death penalty for suicide bombers will deter them, so no need to worry anymore. 🙂
mooseFree MemberLate to this party but:
He couldn’t have built a bomb in isolation so valid concern that another attack possible until all caught.
From what I’ve read and know, most likely HME, you’d be surprised how easy it is to make, most likely ingredients stolen or a wide network to acquire them, so not to raise suspicions.
The bringing of troops in I read to mean, we have got rid of that many Police we are now too pushed and need the army in to take up the shortfall
Valid, however, putting us on duty at places they’re unlikely to attack means cops with guns are free to protect members of the public.
I wouldn’t be too happy at having to engage a target with my weapon, we don’t have the rounds the police do, the risk of over penetration is a real risk. In fact, lets just hope nobody has to shoot anyone, there’s been enough death already this month. Well, I’m not sure I mean that. I wouldn’t cry if one of his associates or like minded individuals were put down with a few rounds to centre of mass. Maybe I should be more liberal, who knows. Potato, potato.
Ironically these aresholes won’t attack the military who are in ‘their’ countries, at least the IRA had a pop at us too. Instead they have almost solely focused on civilians, cowards of the highest order, which is why I give their stated aims and reasons zero credibility. Apart from the attack at Westminster and Fus Rigby, they’ve not tried to attack the establishment once.
Sad thing is, even if we stopped doing all the things they claim, dumped billions in aid, they would still find the reasons and motivation to murder civilians. this problem is never going away, their’s no political wing to do back room deals with. Sad, very sad.
RustySpannerFull MemberAnyone listen to the interview on PM yesterday with the young Mancunian of Libyan descent who knew the bomber?
I found his views on the causes of radicalisation quite eye opening.
Link. From approx 47 minutes.I hope someone was listening to him.
mooseFree MemberI doubt it, we’ll continue on ill-advised foreign policy and push on with the ever growing socioeconmic gulf and see where that takes us.
ninfanFree MemberThe bringing of troops in I read to mean, we have got rid of that many Police we are now too pushed and need the army in to take up the shortfall
the issue isn’t just ‘police’ though is it? Its armed police for key point protection
I believe the ‘home office’ police have about 1000 less armed officers than 2010 – but speaking to an ex-police firearms trainer about this he says the headline numbers are deceptive, as some of those armed roles have moved to ‘other’ police forces like MODP, CNC, BTP, SSG etc. While some other roles have changed as armed police have become more specialised – due to immense pressure from the public after incidents like Mark Duggan.
JoeBonesFree MemberSome absolute cobblers on here. No shortage of offended lefties too.
May isn’t perfect but she is a hell of a lot better a chance for the United Kingdom at sorting the economy (and terrorists) than that lefty, economy wrecking, terrorist apologist Corbyn. And thats before you get to the human rights brigade.
Remember what Labour did to the construction/housebuilding industry, never mind apologising for the IRA.
Im looking forward to seeing him getting binned at the next election.
kimbersFull MemberMay isn’t perfect but she is a hell of a lot better a chance for the United Kingdom at sorting the economy (and terrorists) than that lefty, economy wrecking, terrorist apologist Corbyn. And thats before you get to the human rights brigade.
Yeah coz whilst May was busying voting to stir up the hornets nest(she supported Blair in his war voting 5 times with him in the )
Corbyn was predicting the future
[video]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=16BtpSCufU0[/video]sadly all you right wingers were too busy fapping yourselves silly to the Suns headlines to worry about consequences
and more recently helping create more misery in the middle east…
not to mention her cuts to the police
[video]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2R5Q1DHi5kk[/video]still you think that corbyn is the dangerous one 🙄
JoeBonesFree MemberBlair was a complete idiot too.
Anyway, the problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other peoples money.
epicycloFull MemberJoeBones – Member
Blair was a complete idiot too.Anyway, the problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other peoples money.
The problem with capitalism is you never run out of other people’s money.
CountZeroFull MemberI believe the ‘home office’ police have about 1000 less armed officers than 2010 – but speaking to an ex-police firearms trainer about this he says the headline numbers are deceptive, as some of those armed roles have moved to ‘other’ police forces like MODP, CNC, BTP, SSG etc. While some other roles have changed as armed police have become more specialised – due to immense pressure from the public after incidents like Mark Duggan.
Not sure just how much credence to give it, but I’ve read some reports that it’s becoming increasingly difficult to recruit armed police officers due to concerns about being charged with unlawful killing, or some such charge, in the same way troops were being hit with law suites brought by scumbag legal teams touting for business.
Under normal circumstances I doubt very much that this country could field anywhere near enough armed police, irrespective of cuts or whatever, there isn’t the call for large numbers of such officers, and our police are not routinely armed, and we don’t have a paramilitary force like many European countries do, like France, Spain, the US, etc.
It makes perfect sense to utilise the military, freeing the police to carry on being police and dealing with regular crime.wilburtFree MemberExcellent question time this evening most notably for me the young Muslim lady who said the Saudi funded Mosques need to be closed for starting this anti west narrative that ultimately ends up as extremism.
Please go watch it before you post the usual “its not about religion” stuff.
kimbersFull Memberyoung Muslim lady who said the Saudi funded Mosques
indeed the Saudis use repressive Wahabism to keep themselves in power but have to bomb the crap out of Yemen when jihadists want to take their doctrine to the next step
Not that we’d dare upset them, the West will keep paying them billions for oil and selling them weapons, ignoring their human rights abuses, treatment of women etc etc
The topic ‘This 'critical threat' stuff’ is closed to new replies.