Viewing 38 posts - 321 through 358 (of 358 total)
  • The nasty party conference…
  • ninfan
    Free Member

    needs to appeal to the party faithful

    I would have thought that she told them exactly the sort of things they wanted to hear.

    You still don’t get it do you?

    ernie_lynch
    Free Member

    Well I get that May is still in the running to be leader if she has appeal within the party.

    I’m not convinced that she’s “signed her own death warrant” because she’s upset a few newspaper columnists.

    footflaps
    Full Member

    You can’t win elections by appealing to the party faithful!

    You can win Tory Party leadership elections though…..

    ninfan
    Free Member

    if she has appeal within the party.

    You can’t win elections by appealing to the party faithful – just what we have been saying all along about Corbyn.

    You can win Tory Party leadership elections though…..

    No, you can’t – unlike Labour, you can’t get to be party leader of the conservatives just by appealing to the party faithful, you need to appeal to the 1922 committee first.

    ernie_lynch
    Free Member

    You can’t win elections by appealing to the party faithful

    You said that she had “signed her own death warrant”. I can’t see the evidence for that is overwhelming. I’m not convinced that she is now less likely to become the next leader of the Tory Party than before. I always thought her chances weren’t particularly good anyhow.

    And if she does become leader she clearly wouldn’t have “signed her own death warrant” with her speech this week as you claim, whether or not she wins the next general election as leader is a separate issue.

    Anyway, I don’t know why I’m arguing with you.

    outofbreath
    Free Member

    May’s speech on immigration was met with polite applause. Gove’s speech on liberal prison reform got a standing ovation.

    Perhaps the Tory faithful are pretty liberal minded people.

    kimbers
    Full Member

    outofbreath – Member
    May’s speech on immigration was met with polite applause. Gove’s speech on liberal prison reform got a standing ovation.

    Perhaps the Tory faithful are pretty liberal minded people.

    or just assuaging their guilt at the cuts to the already struggling prison service, still I imagine that signed copy of the King James Bible for every prison library will fix things

    DrJ
    Full Member

    Gove’s speech on liberal prison reform got a standing ovation.

    Maybe he should send a copy to Dave’s pals in Saudi? Perhaps they’d appreciate the alternatives to crucifixion.

    DrJ
    Full Member

    still I imagine that signed copy of the King James Bible for every prison library will fix things

    Books were banned in prison, weren’t they? (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-30344867)

    There really is no overlap between what Tories say and what they actually do.

    DaRC_L
    Full Member

    I would have thought that she told them exactly the sort of things they wanted to hear.

    As long as their hearing aids were turned up 🙂 so what happens if the Tory Think Tank is right and all those Tory voting pensioners aren’t around come the next election?

    outofbreath
    Free Member

    Books were banned in prison, weren’t they?

    No.

    nemesis
    Free Member

    To be fair, DrJ, they didn’t so really there’s no overlap between what you say and what the Tories actually do 🙂

    DrJ
    Full Member

    Indeed. Prisoners were only banned from receiving books in parcels. So that’s ok then. Phew!

    footflaps
    Full Member

    As long as their hearing aids were turned up so what happens if the Tory Think Tank is right and all those Tory voting pensioners aren’t around come the next election?

    Yep, the Tax Payer’s Alliance have a very short sighted strategy, kill off all the people who vote for you, to save money…

    teamhurtmore
    Free Member

    nemesis AND DrJ +1 😉

    Double-edged one that!!!

    Austerity anyone?

    nemesis
    Free Member

    Well, FWIW, it sounds bloody stupid and it’s a good thing that they were told it wasn’t lawful but they still didn’t ‘ban books in prison’…

    mefty
    Free Member

    There seems to be a misunderstanding of how a Tory leadership election works. The Blonde Bombshell has a mountain to climb as today he wouldn’t get on the membership ballot. The Tory MPs elect two candidates to be put before the membership, so you first have to win over that constituency. Boris is weak here, he has not been in parliament to cultivate a following among MPs. Meanwhile Osborne has been using his extensive powers of patronage to create a large number of MPs who owe him a favour, likewise Tory MPs love Theresa May because she puts the hours in for MPs by speaking at their associations, Boris has only a few years to catch up and I can’t see it happening as he doesn’t have a reputation for being clubable.

    DrJ
    Full Member

    Well, FWIW, it sounds bloody stupid

    Thing is, it’s not just “bloody stupid”, it’s something that you absolutely could never consider doing if you actually believe what Gove and CMD say they believe. The act of banning books in prisons exposes the hollowness and cynicism of their words.

    DrJ
    Full Member

    [Boris] doesn’t have a reputation for being clubable

    Oh, I don’t know …

    binners
    Full Member

    Love him or hate him, Osborne is also the brains that delivered the first Tory majority since 1992. And Tory MP’s love that! And they’ll be the ones voting. What have Gove, the bumbling one, and the low rent Thatcher wanabee done to compare to that? Unless he ****s up big time, he’s a shoe in

    outofbreath
    Free Member

    Well, FWIW, it sounds bloody stupid and it’s a good thing that they were told it wasn’t lawful but they still didn’t ‘ban books in prison’…

    I think they banned parcels because stuff was getting sneaking in in parcels.

    If people want to describe banning one method of book delivery as “banning books” they could equally say “books are banned” because prisoners can’t download books from the internet in their cells or walk down to Waterstones to buy then.

    The Prisons Minister at the time specifically reversed the ban on Fifty Shades in Prison Libraries because he wanted to encourage reading.

    mefty
    Free Member

    Unless he ****s up big time, he’s a shoe in

    If the World Economy blows up, entirely possible, and completely outside his control, he will be in difficulties too.

    Oh, I don’t know …

    Good to see existing levels of “deep thought” maintained.

    binners
    Full Member

    I personally think that Osborne is the shrewdest political operator we’ve had since Blair. Even if that happens I can see him somehow turning it to his advantage.

    mefty
    Free Member

    He has certainly become quite a substantial politician, despite the diet.

    konabunny
    Free Member

    The bumbling good egg shtick may play well to a receptive audience of Londoners, it looks very different from outside

    This is Binners’s traditional parochial talking point where he implies all Londoners are Chateauneuf-swilling Drones Club members and everyone outside London is a plain-talking hard-grafting spade identifier like he is. It is, as always, completely wrong.

    kimbers
    Full Member

    true dat , last time, borris only just scraped past geriatric, lame duck Livingston, that even the guardian had turned against, despite bozza having all the London papers and most of the national ones behind him.
    Binners is forgetting that heir to the third baronecy of whatever Gideon is was elected as an MP just down the road from Manchester

    footflaps
    Full Member

    This is Binners’s traditional parochial talking point where he implies all Londoners are Chateauneuf-swilling Drones Club members

    You mean you’re not? How awful for you…..

    Junkyard
    Free Member

    and you are forgetting that they have not parachuted Boris into a safe Northern powerhouse seat

    Tom-B
    Free Member

    …..and by ‘just down the road from Manchester’ you mean rural Cheshire…..a Tory stronghold forever!!! I teach in Gideons constituency, and used to teach in Manchester…..worlds apart/20 miles apart at the same time.

    teamhurtmore
    Free Member

    Chateauneuf? Dear, dear, wrong part of the river.

    mefty
    Free Member

    Chateauneuf? Dear, dear, wrong part of the river.

    …and the Drones are frightful bores, what?

    aracer
    Free Member

    In the same way that JC didn’t have a hope? I agree with your suggestion about him having the brains, but a lot can happen in the next 3 years. Nobody had even heard of JC 3 years ago.

    mefty
    Free Member

    Nobody had even heard of JC 3 years ago.

    Speak for yourself I have been aware of him for 30 years.

    aracer
    Free Member

    Well I was speaking for the general public, or even the majority of people who ended up voting for him. What % of the general public had heard of him 3 years ago?

    outofbreath
    Free Member
    teamhurtmore
    Free Member

    Thank goodness for the media, aracer!!

    They create then destroy….

    ernie_lynch
    Free Member

    aracer – Member

    Well I was speaking for the general public

    Who elected you then ?

    Stoner
    Free Member

    Who elected you then ?

    Its amazing what £3 gets you these days…

Viewing 38 posts - 321 through 358 (of 358 total)

The topic ‘The nasty party conference…’ is closed to new replies.