Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
  • What are the merits of cheap carbon over high end alloy frames?
  • mudsux
    Free Member

    Particularly for road bikes actually but since on-one are doing carbon mtb frames now – could be for MTB as well.

    RealMan
    Free Member

    Low quality carbon can often be heavier then high end aluminium. Stiffness and vibration damping will be negligible usually, so all you're really getting is the ability to say "my bikes carbon".

    steve_b77
    Free Member

    Cheap carbon can be flexy and rubbish to ride, but then again so can expensive alloy.

    mudsux
    Free Member

    the boardmans seem to review ok.
    some mixed comments on the planet-x.
    not read anything about ribbles or the evans pinnacle.

    cynic-al
    Free Member

    Price!

    foxyrider
    Free Member

    Ribble Sportive Carbon rider here – Love it 🙂 Had a Allez B4 which was fast but harsh 🙂 Just did 174 Km Sportive on it and was 142 out of 800 riders so that's my recommendation (sorry not bragging just showing you don't need boutique bikes to be up the front) 🙂

    BTW: MudSux

    Hairychested
    Free Member

    I'd prefer a Trek 1.5 to a Claud Butler Torino. Plastic might be pretty but I dislike plastic frames.

    bommer
    Free Member

    none

    HTTP404
    Free Member

    Ribble do a carbon Evo model that can be specced for under £1000.
    However, I don't know how they compare to say a Cannondale CAAD9 alloy frame who everybody seems to rave about.

Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)

The topic ‘What are the merits of cheap carbon over high end alloy frames?’ is closed to new replies.