Viewing 40 posts - 1 through 40 (of 125 total)
  • The M5 crash last night
  • Cougar
    Full Member

    Probably caused by speed

    Could you put down your Daily Mail and tell me where you got that “fact” from, please?

    (Also, on a point of pedantry, it wasn’t this morning)

    molgrips
    Free Member

    Hmm, haven’t heard of a big pileup for many a year. Seems a little odd in this day and age. Foggy was it?

    paulosoxo
    Free Member

    Right speed for the conditions. If its safe to do 20, it’s 20. The biggest danger on the motorway comes from tailgaters and people concentrating more on their speedo than the flow of the traffic

    All in all, a bit insensitive since we don’t know what really happened yet.

    defydude
    Free Member

    [video]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xm77oqPvOG0[/video]

    Cougar
    Full Member

    why not just reduce the speed to 65mph the max for a coach.

    NSL speed limit for a coach it 70mph, incidentally.

    grantway
    Free Member

    yep was around 10 ish last night Motorway closed all day
    very sad for what i was hearing

    deadlydarcy
    Free Member

    Jesus project, you manage to twist many a story to suit your wailing and gnashing of teeth…

    Rain and fog Mol. Happened yesterday evening. M5 still shut.

    I guess some people won’t be seeing their loved ones this weekend, or ever. But ne’er mind, it gives project something to whinge about on a Saturday.

    EDIT

    Rain and fog Mol

    Seems there are conflicting reports about weather conditions. 😕

    paulosoxo
    Free Member

    So far the only fact the OP has right is that there was a motorway involved.

    bigG
    Free Member

    Did no one die when average speeds where lower then? Move on from your vintage idyll and come into the 21st century.

    It’s an awful incident for all involved.

    So why not stop being a dick about it and get on with something important?

    anagallis_arvensis
    Full Member

    Project is right though,I would bet my arse the major factor was inappropriate speed and following too close though!! The timing if this tragic event just highlights how daft increasing the speed limit is.

    I was watching someone defend the increase to an 80mph limit on the telly box a few weeks back, cant remember if he was a Tory or an RAC/AA type person. Anyway he said something like people are sensible enough to be able to choose if they go 80 or 70 or whatever. I doubt that bloe has ever driven if he thinks motorists either think for themselves or appear capable of making sensible decisions.

    Cougar
    Full Member

    Yet, he’s on TV taking about it, and you aren’t. Why d’you think that might be?

    br
    Free Member

    Probably caused by speed

    No, most probably caused by inappropriate speed and/or someone not paying attention.

    I went on a speed awareness course a few months ago, and even the ex-copper who presented it was careful to not use the ‘speed kills’ phrase – because its not true.

    why not just reduce the speed to 65mph the max for a coach.

    And 5mph will make what difference exactly?

    ernie_lynch
    Free Member

    I don’t like the thought of this tragedy being turned into a spectacle for discussion so quickly, when we know so little, and people are yet to told that their loved ones have died. But I’d just like to say that this comment is worthy of note :

    The biggest danger on the motorway comes from tailgaters

    I can’t see how 27 vehicles can be involved in one accident without it being a case of inappropriate distances between vehicles. It’s clear that on motorways, the faster vehicles travel, the closer they get to the vehicle in front. The biggest gaps between vehicles are always between the slowest vehicles – madness. Even if a driver keeps a sensible distance it is no guarantee against shunting. Hopefully one day there will be the technology to clock and fine drivers of vehicles which travel too close to the vehicle in front.

    I can’t imagine what the first responders had/are having to deal with.

    buzz-lightyear
    Free Member

    I’m ~20 miles away. There was a lot of water on the road. Then some fairly thick Fog formed very rapidly ~7pm and lasted until ~9pm when it completely cleared. I think the collisions happened at ~8pm.

    My GF returned from a visit to Musgrove Park Hospital in Taunton via that section of road, at ~5pm. It would have been horrific in A&E and MAU dealing with the 40 hurt peeps. Feeling very relieved she wasn’t caught up in it. My thoughts are with the 40 hurt peeps.

    HoratioHufnagel
    Free Member

    Even if its not *caused* by speed, speed makes it worse.

    TheFlyingOx
    Full Member

    Wasn’t there a fireworks display right next to the motorway when this happened? If so, I reckon that could have contributed as much as how close people drive to each other.

    BenHouldsworth
    Free Member

    I can’t see how 27 vehicles can be involved in one accident without it being a case of inappropriate distances between vehicles

    I think this hits the nail on the head, we’ve got a family friend who is a traffic officer who says they are far more likely to pull you for tailgating than speeding, its all about the stopping distance.

    Speed doesn’t kill, proximity does.

    anagallis_arvensis
    Full Member

    Yet, he’s on TV taking about it, and you aren’t. Why d’you think that might be?

    because he was a politician/lobyiest? Do you seriously think the majority of drivers make sensible and rational dcisions regarding speed and distance.

    Oh and speed does kills you fools its simple physics, if your going faster the the forces in crashes are higher. Having appropriate safety margins can prevent the crashes of course, but the majority dont use them. All this **** about with inappropriate speed crap is all well and good if the mjority of drivers had any **** clue about what they were doing, but most dont.

    Cougar
    Full Member

    I don’t like the thought of this tragedy being turned into a spectacle for discussion so quickly,

    Hear hear.

    without it being a case of inappropriate distances between vehicles.

    Yup. This is a fundamental problem generally. Many people drive at speed with the same braking distance they’d have around town. It’s not enough.

    I’m ~20 miles away.

    OH was brought up in Taunton. It was a bit difficult last night.

    anagallis_arvensis
    Full Member

    Speed doesn’t kill, proximity does

    bullshit, you can be very close if in a traffic jam and the chances of death are low, each view boiled down the the basics is stupid.

    TheFlyingOx
    Full Member

    Info from someone on Pistonheads who claims to be involved in the aftermath:

    The incident appears to have been caused by a vehicle travelling too slowly to merge safely just pulling out from the sliproad and onto the motorway, causing the vehicle behind (an HGV) to brake/change lanes and setting off the horrific chain of events we’re now discussing.

    Cougar
    Full Member

    because he was a politician/lobyiest?

    Was he? You thought he was might’ve been from the AA a minute ago.

    Do you seriously think the majority of drivers make sensible and rational dcisions regarding speed and distance.

    No, I don’t. But that’s a wholly different point.

    All this **** about with inappropriate speed crap

    Yes, it’s crap, well done, you’ve got us there. We should all drive round on the motorway at 40mph irrespective of road conditions. That’s a much better idea.

    yunki
    Free Member

    there were certainly some impenetrable banks of patchy fog in the South West last night..
    I imagine this was a major factor in producing the conditions needed for this sort of event to occur..

    Cougar
    Full Member

    you can be very close if in a traffic jam and the chances of death are low, each view boiled down the the basics is stupid.

    You can be driving at 200mph on an empty motorway and the chances of death are low, each view boiled down the the basics is stupid.

    Cougar
    Full Member

    The incident appears to have been caused by a vehicle travelling too slowly

    BenHouldsworth
    Free Member

    bullshit, you can be very close if in a traffic jam and the chances of death are low, each view boiled down the the basics is stupid.

    Stop being an argumentative prick, I’m off to ride my bike

    anagallis_arvensis
    Full Member

    You can be driving at 200mph on an empty motorway and the chances of death are low, each view boiled down the the basics is stupid.

    Tell that to that little fella on top gear.

    Was he? You thought he was might’ve been from the AA a minute ago.

    Could of been but they are a very big lobbying/pro car group.

    Do you seriously think the majority of drivers make sensible and rational dcisions regarding speed and distance.

    No, I don’t. But that’s a wholly different point.

    How? We could get rid of all speed limits everywhere, if we think drivers should determine the speed they travel at? You’ll need to explain your point here, I’m not sure I get it.

    All this **** about with inappropriate speed crap

    Yes, it’s crap, well done, you’ve got us there. We should all drive round on the motorway at 40mph irrespective of road conditions. That’s a much better idea.

    Dont understand this point either, you seem a bit confused to me.

    TheFlyingOx
    Full Member

    Nah, he was doing 288mph. Ultimate proof that it’s speed that’s dangerous.

    ernie_lynch
    Free Member

    The incident appears to have been caused by a vehicle travelling too slowly to merge safely just pulling out from the sliproad and onto the motorway, causing the vehicle behind (an HGV) to brake/change lanes and setting off the horrific chain of events we’re now discussing.

    Yup, I can imagine how that could have been a cause of the accident. The question is how did 27 vehicles become involved ?

    trailmonkey
    Full Member

    i don’t think it’s about speed, it’s about safe distance.

    everyone could be travelling at 200 mph and there wouldn’t be a pile up if safe distances were applied.

    either way it’s horrific stuff.

    anagallis_arvensis
    Full Member

    Stop being an argumentative prick, I’m off to ride my bike

    Have fun

    oldnpastit
    Full Member

    Easy there with the clever remarks. Real people have died.

    TheFlyingOx
    Full Member

    The question is how did 27 vehicles become involved ?

    The 27 vehicles came to be involved for a multitude of reasons.
    These may include, but are not limited to:

    Travelling too close to the car in front
    Not concentrating on the road and events ahead
    Poorly maintained vehicles
    Tyres with too little tread
    Inappropriate speed for the conditions
    Sheer, utter bad luck 🙁

    MrNutt
    Free Member

    My thoughts are with the families, If I’d have stayed in Cornwall for the extra night that I was considering I’d have been passing that junction at about the time it happened!

    That stretch of motorway seems to be an accident blackspot, several times I’ve been held up around Bridgewater, one time I ended up having to divert adding 4hrs to my journey home.

    It’s also worth noting that Bridgewater had flash flooding yesterday, that amount of water, heavy rain (it seems to be raining there more than anywhere else on the m40/A30, it’s bit of a micro climate there) and thick fog, couple that with folk who will have been driving for around 2hrs+ coming up from the south. Its a worry given I drive that route a hell of a lot.

    Cougar
    Full Member

    Tell that to that little fella on top gear.

    Which motorway was he on when he crashed his rocket-powered car, then?

    How? We could get rid of all speed limits everywhere, if we think drivers should determine the speed they travel at? You’ll need to explain your point here, I’m not sure I get it.

    Well, you essentially seemed to be saying “there was an expert on TV talking about this, I know more than he does.”

    I’d love to be able to get rid of speed limits. I think the majority of people would drive sensibly. However, a good chunk wouldn’t, which is why limits are necessary. In an ideal world we’d have variable limits everywhere, but that’s impractical.

    Dont understand this point either, you seem a bit confused to me.

    Seems one of us is.

    higgo
    Free Member

    I don’t like the thought of this tragedy being turned into a spectacle for discussion so quickly, when we know so little, and people are yet to told that their loved ones have died.

    and

    Easy there with the clever remarks. Real people have died.

    anagallis_arvensis
    Full Member

    Well, you essentially seemed to be saying “there was an expert on TV talking about this, I know more than he does.”

    I’d love to be able to get rid of speed limits. I think the majority of people would drive sensibly. However, a good chunk wouldn’t, which is why limits are necessary. In an ideal world we’d have variable limits everywhere, but that’s impractical.

    So politicans and procar lobbyiests are experts on road safety are they?

    Do you really think most people drive sensibly? I’m stunned anyone would think this after a short trip around our roads.

    Dont understand this point either, you seem a bit confused to me.

    Seems one of us is.

    so clear, thanks

    TheFlyingOx
    Full Member

    Or, we could be adults and accept that nasty things happen and discussing them is one way of learning how to prevent them happening again, or lessen their impact.

    trailmonkey
    Full Member

    So politicans and procar lobbyiests are experts on road safety are they?

    i’m sure that traffic experts are employed by the pro lobby yes.

    if you’re trying to suggest that the anti lobby will be any more objective than the pro lobby then yours is an argument built on sand.

Viewing 40 posts - 1 through 40 (of 125 total)

The topic ‘The M5 crash last night’ is closed to new replies.