The biggest advance...
 

[Closed] The biggest advance in MTBing in the last decade...? Discuss...

 mboy
Posts: 12647
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Was sat down earlier pondering (for some reason) what the biggest advances to MTBing in general (and to the way I ride myself) were in the last 10 years. It was about 10 years ago I first found this very forum, and started actually riding "properly" you might say.

First I thought it must be suspension travel. Then I realised back in 2002 I was riding around on a 5" travel Specialized Enduro that wouldn't look out of place now really. And there were many longish travel full sus bikes out there that could still be ridden all day too, and a number of hardtails were already being designed for 5" travel forks too. Whilst shock technology has moved on, I think suspension on the whole had its biggest improvement from about 98-03, since then it's been evolution not revolution IMO.

Next I thought about disc brakes... Well in 2002 I was riding around on Shimano 4 pot XT discs. To this day, a well setup set of 4 pot XT's with decent pads will embarrass many current offerings. Disc brakes may have got lighter, but on the whole again it's minor evolution not revolution.

So what about gears? Well I was on 9spd XT/XTR back in 2001 even, I only switched to 10spd (which again is minor evolution) last year and whilst it's an improvement, it's only very marginal. Having an 11-36 cassette does help for single ring use though.

What about components (bars, seatposts, stems etc.)? Well, bars have got wider (though most people still run sensible width), stems have got a bit shorter on the whole, but even back in 2002 I considered 90mm the longest I'd run even on an XC bike and that's not changed. Are components any lighter/stronger now? Maybe, but again it's marginal.

So what's the biggest advance in the last decade IMO?

Tyres... 10 years ago you either bought light, skinny, flimsy and fairly hard compound XC tyres, or you accepted a weight penalty for the extra grip and fitted chunkier DH tyres. There was no middle ground as such. These days we expect lightweight, soft compound, fast yet grippy tyres in anything from 2.1-2.5" flavours to suit our riding, whereas back in 2002 these tyres simply weren't available (even though many frames already had the clearance for them). Tubeless has helped a lot too, as has the ability to run non UST tyres in a tubeless setup with Stans (et al) solutions and rims. But I think the sheer quantity of bigger, grippier, yet still fast and light tyres has made the biggest difference personally for me, as I always used to suffer the weight and slowness of DH tyres even on an XC bike cos I wanted the grip back then.

Oh, and saddles with a groove, and decent cycling shorts. Though these both already existed back then, I had just yet to discover them!


 
Posted : 04/04/2012 4:24 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Fatbikes.

Truely a step-change in true All Terrain Biking.


 
Posted : 04/04/2012 4:27 pm
Posts: 1014
Free Member
 

CX bikes the best invention in the last 10 years imo.

they bridge the gap between road and XC brilliantly, allowing road bikes off road or XC bikes to keep up on the road.


 
Posted : 04/04/2012 4:30 pm
Posts: 815
Free Member
 

as above - tyres

also a true understanding of geometry and general all round speccing of bike components


 
Posted : 04/04/2012 4:31 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

CX bikes? 10 years? I'm going with trail centres, like them or loathe them, they have to be the most significant step forward (or possibly backwards) for making mountain biking more accesable.


 
Posted : 04/04/2012 4:33 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

29ers. No, wait, 650b, no wait....

😉

for me, it would be weight reduction. Technology and materials have advanced so well that we can now make stronger bikes lighter. Etc.


 
Posted : 04/04/2012 4:33 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

A £59 mud guard


 
Posted : 04/04/2012 4:34 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

CX bikes the best invention in the last 10 years imo.
I think you'll find that CX bikes have been round a LOT longer than 10 years !


 
Posted : 04/04/2012 4:34 pm
Posts: 34454
Full Member
 

no one mentioned gravity droppers yet, or is that like the naughty word on QI?


 
Posted : 04/04/2012 4:35 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

for me: man-size handlebars.

if i had a time-machine, and i could take 1 thing back 10 years, to give to my younger, thinner self, i'd take a low-rise 760 handlebar.


 
Posted : 04/04/2012 4:37 pm
Posts: 919
Free Member
 

Uppy downy posts - mine has made the biggest difference to my riding.

Way more than anything else has.


 
Posted : 04/04/2012 4:38 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

This

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 04/04/2012 4:39 pm
Posts: 3057
Full Member
 

Tubeless tyres.


 
Posted : 04/04/2012 4:40 pm
Posts: 5
Free Member
 

For you mboy it was sharing a bed with K and a few other lads before being led out into the deep dark woods... 😯 😆


 
Posted : 04/04/2012 4:40 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

+ 1 Uppy Downy


 
Posted : 04/04/2012 4:40 pm
Posts: 13850
Free Member
 

Uppy downy posts.

And I'm predicting that the next few years will bring us lever adjustable tyre pressure - 40psi to get you up the fire road, back down to 25 for the rooty, slippy bits. It's GENIUS. And patented


 
Posted : 04/04/2012 4:42 pm
 Goz
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Skill courses.


 
Posted : 04/04/2012 4:43 pm
 gee
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Tyres and tubeless. That and XC race bikes - no longer road bikes with flat bars.

GB


 
Posted : 04/04/2012 4:43 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Carbon fibre?
Like it or hate it; it's changed what manufacturers thought they were capable of.
Trail Centres?
Definately made MTBing more accessible to the masses, which is a massive positive.
Suspension design/weight loss?
160mm travel bikes which are as pedal friendly as the 50mm travel bikes of yesteryear.
Aaron Gwinn?
He's ginger and he's fast as f*** 😀


 
Posted : 04/04/2012 4:43 pm
 mboy
Posts: 12647
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Fatbikes.

Have had a quick go, intriguing... Would like to have a longer go, but that would probably involve having to buy one! Sadly...

CX bikes the best invention in the last 10 years imo.

Errr... Pretty sure CX has been around a whole lot longer than 10 years! 😕

also a true understanding of geometry and general all round speccing of bike components

I'm almost certain there's as many bike manufacturers cocking up geometry and componentry now as there was back then. Every time I go into a bike shop and look at new bikes, there's always some glaring errors on pre-built bikes IMO in either or both geometry and specification.

I'm going with trail centres

They have made a difference yes. Good/bad/indifferent, but they have had an impact. Though I was more on about the bikes themselves than where we ride.

29ers. No, wait, 650b, no wait....

29ers were on the market 10 years ago, and it has taken almost 10 years to get any kind of market share. I'm not saying they're bad, I owned one, I liked it. But I think for most people, most of the time, 26" wheels still make the most sense on a mountain bike.

no one mentioned gravity droppers yet, or is that like the naughty word on QI?

They've been around a long time now, and there's still not a remotely reliable offering on the market! And they're still ridiculously expensive. How can it be the likes of Fox and Rockshox can make a suspension fork go up and down all day long and not fail, yet a glorified office chair lasts about a week before it fails! And yes, I bought one, a KS i900. Worked for about 6 rides, then it failed... The only one that seems to remotely work is the RS Reverb, but then it is £300 and it still has its faults.


 
Posted : 04/04/2012 4:43 pm
Posts: 41786
Free Member
 

+1 for tyres, or at least a mainstream acceptance of the 2.35 High roller as being a trail tyres, not a light DH tyre, as strictly speeking it was probably arround 10 years ago.

Gravity droppers are probably the only 'new' part in the last 10 years, and have taken about 10 years of development (remember those horrible heavy titec double posts?).

CFRP frames? Been arround 20 years now, but only in the last few years they've been affordable as an option against aluminium.

29ers? Not revolutionary, but the only 'big' development (i.e. they made your old 26" kit redundant) whereas everything else was a re-hash of an existing thing.


 
Posted : 04/04/2012 4:44 pm
Posts: 13594
Free Member
 

Carbon Fibre frames - they are now common place now..


 
Posted : 04/04/2012 4:45 pm
 mboy
Posts: 12647
Free Member
Topic starter
 

For you mboy it was sharing a bed with K and a few other lads before being led out into the deep dark woods...

Ironically psling, you could be right! Until that point I'd not really done much proper riding. You showing us some proper trails in the UK really got me into it, then next year I rode everywhere and even went to the Alps!


 
Posted : 04/04/2012 4:45 pm
 edd
Posts: 1390
Full Member
 

Another +1 for uppy downy seatposts


 
Posted : 04/04/2012 4:46 pm
Posts: 41786
Free Member
 

They've been around a long time now, and there's still not a remotely reliable offering on the market! And they're still ridiculously expensive. How can it be the likes of Fox and Rockshox can make a suspension fork go up and down all day long and not fail, yet a glorified office chair lasts about a week before it fails! And yes, I bought one, a KS i900. Worked for about 6 rides, then it failed... The only one that seems to remotely work is the RS Reverb, but then it is £300 and it still has its faults.

Hate to pee on your chips but, you bought something imported by superstar and it broke. I bought my reverb for £180 new off CRC, it still works. If anyones paying £300 for a reverb they're a fool, theyre £200 on CRC.


 
Posted : 04/04/2012 4:47 pm
 mboy
Posts: 12647
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Carbon Fibre frames - they are now common place now..

Not really. They're readily available, but you still don't see that many out on the trails IMO. They were readily available 10 years ago too if you had the money, which some people I know did...


 
Posted : 04/04/2012 4:48 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Well clearly, it's the new "waisted" headstem on the Orange 5.


 
Posted : 04/04/2012 4:49 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I sold my reverb.
Hopefully and excitedly pressing the remote only to be met with crushing disappointment when EFF ALL HAPPENED!!! AGAIN!!!


 
Posted : 04/04/2012 4:51 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

+1 Reverb uppy downy.

Nothing else has so enhanced the riding experience, oh and the now defunct Trail guru replaced by Strava App, they're a fun accessory, oh and finding this place, at times it can provide lots of useful hints and tips, but it can be a bit Muller Rice..


 
Posted : 04/04/2012 4:51 pm
Posts: 13850
Free Member
 

mboy - Member

They've been around a long time now, and there's still not a remotely reliable offering on the market! And they're still ridiculously expensive. How can it be the likes of Fox and Rockshox can make a suspension fork go up and down all day long and not fail, yet a glorified office chair lasts about a week before it fails! And yes, I bought one, a KS i900. Worked for about 6 rides, then it failed... The only one that seems to remotely work is the RS Reverb, but then it is £300 and it still has its faults.

My i900 has been flawless, apart from me replacing the cable after about a year and a half becasue it got a bit gritty.

Those forks that go up and down all day cost four or five times the price of a seatpost (which isn't £300 quid either, unless you're pissing money away).


 
Posted : 04/04/2012 4:54 pm
Posts: 6745
Free Member
 

Maxle and its variants?


 
Posted : 04/04/2012 4:56 pm
 mboy
Posts: 12647
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Hate to pee on your chips but, you bought something imported by superstar and it broke.

Slightly abrupt point, but I suppose well made... I did get a little carried away as at the time (2008) the i900 was reported as being the best uppy-downy post out there, and I had cash in my pocket, and it was at Mountain Mayhem.

Maxle and its variants?

I was using a 20mm axled fork 10 years ago anyway cos I'd already discovered the benefits, but yeah the Maxle has made things a lot quicker and easier for sure. 20mm stifness, QR ease of use.


 
Posted : 04/04/2012 5:01 pm
Posts: 34454
Full Member
 

The only one that seems to remotely work is the RS Reverb,

apart from the gravity dropper!


 
Posted : 04/04/2012 5:04 pm
Posts: 9
Free Member
 

I'd have to disagree about fatbikes, too much of a niche thing to really appeal to most riders. Although I am fat curious.
I think possibly platform damping in rear shocks has come a long way in the last 10 years and is pretty common on most full sussers now. It certainly improved my 2004 Enduro's climbing ability without compromising its downhill performance.


 
Posted : 04/04/2012 5:15 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Got to be lighting. (lights and batteries)

10 years ago lights were either weedy little things for riding home on the road, or the few decent output units had batteries the size of Belgium.

If I commuted back then I had to run my Cateye ABS lights on the low wattage setting for most of the ride to make sure I had enough for the commute in and back home. definately needed charging every night

Today, my LED lights give me plenty of light and would (at a push) run 3-4 days worth of commuting without a charge


 
Posted : 04/04/2012 5:21 pm
Posts: 8831
Full Member
 

Fat blokes. Never used to see any fat blokes cycling fifteen years ago but now I see them everywhere 🙂


 
Posted : 04/04/2012 5:25 pm
Posts: 66083
Full Member
 

I'll go with good lights at sensible prices. I wouldn't have been night riding 10 years ago, let alone night racing, simple as that.

Also a fan of gravity droppers but they're an enhancer rather than a game changer. But on that subject...

mboy - Member

They've been around a long time now, and there's still not a remotely reliable offering on the market!

Ironically, there is and it's the original one. Very nearly 10 years since the original Gravity Dropper came out, and it's only lately that any of the copyists have even come close- but people still buy them because they're not ugly then complain that they don't work. KS are pretty good once they've been fixed once. Reverb might be as good now that all those folks have paid their £200 to be beta testers...

My gravity dropper's been more reliable than a standard seatpost 😉


 
Posted : 04/04/2012 5:28 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Gotta be the DFender. Any mudguard which costs £60 has [i]got[/i] to be revolutionary. I've heard it actually clears your tyres as they spin AND prevent all punctures.


 
Posted : 04/04/2012 5:28 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

Whilst I think they have come on I used tubeless in 2002 and there were the beginnings of nobbly Lightweight MTB tyres, Conti Explorer Supersonics and what not.

Still think its probably one the bigger areas of improvements, but the technology was there 10 years ago.


 
Posted : 04/04/2012 5:31 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

OK, how about GPS, and smart 'phone GPS at that. Never get lost, and if you're in a new area, just download a .gpx and it's like having a local to show you the trails.

APF


 
Posted : 04/04/2012 5:32 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

No solely restricted to bikes but has made a big impact - hydroforming.


 
Posted : 04/04/2012 5:34 pm
Posts: 9279
Free Member
 

GPS is a good one. gravity droppers seem nice but I don't think they'd be as useful as a GPS for riding new trails without a local guide.


 
Posted : 04/04/2012 5:35 pm
Posts: 6382
Free Member
 

no one mentioned gravity droppers yet, or is that like the naughty word on QI?

Uppy downy posts - mine has made the biggest difference to my riding.
Way more than anything else has.

+ 1 Uppy Downy

Uppy downy posts.

Another +1 for uppy downy seatposts

+1 Reverb uppy downy.

Nothing else has so enhanced the riding experience,

Really? Outside of trail centres my rides tend to go along for a while, up for a while, or down for a while. In various orders, but rarely have I felt the need to adjust my seat height every 10 seconds.
They're useful, yes, and easier than using a qr, but surely to say they've revolutionised riding is a bit steep.

Tyres, imo- Tyres that work in specific circumstances, tyres that work in all situations, light tyres, heavy duty tyres, tubeless, fat, we've got them all now.
Don't forget the fat bike thing is totally driven by tyres.


 
Posted : 04/04/2012 5:36 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

If you could magically transport a bike and rider from 10 years ago to join in a forum ride today, most of the things mentioned so far wouldn't make all that much difference, they'd still keep up and ride the same stuff.

Apart from all the puncture stops and not being able to see where they're going at night.

Tubeless and modern LED lights and batteries are the biggest advances.


 
Posted : 04/04/2012 5:39 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

MTG - you're looking at it the wrong way round.

You can take a FLOATilla of Fatbikes into places a 10-year old bike would never reach. That's a true advance.


 
Posted : 04/04/2012 5:42 pm
 JoB
Posts: 1451
Free Member
 

the internet

enabled non-club group rides, changed the way of bike shopping, on-line event/race entry, promoted endless, er, discussion


 
Posted : 04/04/2012 5:42 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yeah, I see your point druidh, fatbikes will do stuff that couldn't be done 10 years ago, but very few people want to do it (or want to do it enough to buy a bike for it).

Not getting punctures and being able to ride at night appeals to everyone.


 
Posted : 04/04/2012 5:50 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I have very few punctures, so I don't see tubeless as much of an advance.

Lights - good call. That's certainly opened up a new type of riding for those that want to do it.


 
Posted : 04/04/2012 5:52 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[b]The internet[/b] more specifically web 2.0 (even though I hate that term) to make discussions like this and the many other threads possible.

To be able to discuss/ask questions/obtain information/share experiences globally is pretty amazing no?

On a personal level; me getting a FS bike after having a rigid with v brakes only 2 years ago! 😀
[b]
EDIT[/b] -JoB just said it!


 
Posted : 04/04/2012 5:59 pm
Posts: 66083
Full Member
 

Oh OK, the internet wins the thread in all honesty- very good call.

druidh - Member

You can take a FLOATilla of Fatbikes into places a 10-year old bike would never reach.

And generally the only reason to do so is that you've bought a fat bike 😉


 
Posted : 04/04/2012 6:05 pm
Posts: 9543
Free Member
 

Maybe bikepacking kit. That really does make new riding options that make me happy / motivated / excited more possible.


 
Posted : 04/04/2012 6:06 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Affordable Hydro Disc brakes and Air Forks.


 
Posted : 04/04/2012 6:06 pm
 mboy
Posts: 12647
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Not getting punctures and being able to ride at night appeals to everyone.

Oddly enough not everyone Graham! Though I'm completely with you on both counts... Tubeless was available back in 2002 though, albeit only UST, and a very limited choice of tyres. I was riding at night too back then, probably more than now ironically, but with a cobbled together homebrew style light that wasn't much better than a maglite, certainly nothing like what even just £50 will get you these days.

I'm gobsmacked at how many people are saying about uppy-downy posts being their biggest advance in cycling in the last 10 years! I like to drop my post once in a while, but really they're not that much of an advance.

Really? Outside of trail centres my rides tend to go along for a while, up for a while, or down for a while. In various orders, but rarely have I felt the need to adjust my seat height every 10 seconds.
They're useful, yes, and easier than using a qr, but surely to say they've revolutionised riding is a bit steep.

What he said...

the internet

enabled non-club group rides, changed the way of bike shopping, on-line event/race entry, promoted endless, er, discussion

Good point. Use it as much for keeping in touch with riding buddies and organising rides these days as I do anything else. Was using CRC back in the day when you had to phone them up though... 😉


 
Posted : 04/04/2012 6:07 pm
 mboy
Posts: 12647
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Affordable Hydro Disc brakes and Air Forks.

Were already available by 2002... My XT disc brakes I bought in 2001 cost me £100 an end including rotors, roughly what the new equivalent is today online.

And air sprung forks have been around since the very first MTB suspension, the Original Rockshox RS1 was air sprung back in the early 90's!


 
Posted : 04/04/2012 6:09 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Were already available by 2002... My XT disc brakes I bought in 2001 cost me £100 an end including rotors, roughly what the new equivalent is today online.

And air sprung forks have been around since the very first MTB suspension, the Original Rockshox RS1 was air sprung back in the early 90's!

Fully aware they where around then, but no where near as many affordable versions,

Look at the bikes out there now with hydro discs and air forks, something in 2002 was on very few bikes under £1.5k


 
Posted : 04/04/2012 6:12 pm
Posts: 6859
Free Member
 

Slack head angles and wide bars. They've made bikes more RAD which is the most important thing.


 
Posted : 04/04/2012 6:15 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

The thing with uppy-downy posts is that if you don't need one, you don't need one. As soon as you do, then you really do! I'll explain 😉

If you ride the sort of XC stuff that you have the skills to do with your normal height seat, or accept that you might have to stop for 15sec everynow and then for a height change, then you won't see any, none, zipp, zilch, benefit to fitting a droppy post.

But, if like me, you ride places that have a mixture of XC and AM stuff (in my case Woburn) then the ability to get the seat out of the way on the fly is worth a lot. it's not sometimes even that it's completely necessary, but the confidence boost (and extra margin for body positioning that a low seat opens up) it gives is marked and worthwhile.

I'm not fussed about all that GPS stuff (i'll just flow my eyes, ears and nose (or the locals!) to the best trails thanks 😉 but decent lights and a droppy post hit the spot for me.


 
Posted : 04/04/2012 6:17 pm
Posts: 20945
 

Properly grippy flat pedal shoes that were designed for MTBing rather than borrowed from skate/bmx?


 
Posted : 04/04/2012 6:18 pm
Posts: 6934
Full Member
 

The thing with uppy-downy posts is that if you don't need one, you don't need one. As soon as you do, then you really do! I'll explain

If you ride the sort of XC stuff that you have the skills to do with your normal height seat, or accept that you might have to stop for 15sec everynow and then for a height change, then you won't see any, none, zipp, zilch, benefit to fitting a droppy post.

Given the average group ride stops every 200 yards to scratch their collective arse, it doesn't sound like much of an advance. Riding on your own I can see them being good though.


 
Posted : 04/04/2012 6:38 pm
Posts: 3450
Full Member
 

Forks/rear shocks.......generally lighter more travel travel adjust pretty good all round
rear shocks pretyy impressive with push technology, cane creek double barrel will make any suspension system better......


 
Posted : 04/04/2012 6:46 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Another +1 for uppy downy posts.


 
Posted : 04/04/2012 6:46 pm
Posts: 6859
Free Member
 

If you ride the sort of XC stuff that you have the skills to do with your normal height seat, or accept that you might have to stop for 15sec everynow and then for a height change, then you won't see any, none, zipp, zilch, benefit to fitting a droppy post.

If I'm riding something undulating, I'll have my seat at a good height. Imagine there's an optional little drop / jump / bunny hop over tree etc, one that I wouldn't do it with my seat up. With a normal seatpost, I [i]could[/i] stop, lose all momentum, put my seat down, but half the time if you do that you're going too slow for whatever's in front of you - I probably wouldn't bother, I'd keep my seat up and ride round. Or I'm rolling downhill on a road, with the Reverb I'll put my seat down and bunny hop or manual something. You'd never stop to put your seat down just to do that.

So I'd argue that even if your rides are generally up-for-20-minutes, down for 5 minutes (and repeat), as mine are, then you'll still see a good benefit from an Uppy-Downy. They're not [i]just[/i] time-saving devices.


 
Posted : 04/04/2012 6:52 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I know its not a part, but trail centres must be the biggest advance.

Bikes 10 years ago were not really that different from today, maybe if you went back 20 years then you ould get more advances.


 
Posted : 04/04/2012 7:05 pm
Posts: 66083
Full Member
 

Not to get dragged off into the whole dropper post debate, but I think part of the reason some people who've not tried them think they're pointless is that they call them "dropper posts". Mine isn't a dropper post at all, it's a raiser post- on descents it's down almost all the time and pops up for the traverses and pedals. Which is an awful lot more useful than dropping it 😉


 
Posted : 04/04/2012 7:08 pm
Posts: 7994
Full Member
 

It's got to be down to an individual's experience surely?

10 years ago I was riding a steel 'hardcore' HT with Marzocchi air forks.

Today I'm riding a steel 'burly' AM HT with Marzocchi air forks.

Granted, I now have more travel from the air forks (twice as much), better brakes (disks as opposed to Vs), better geometry for the type of riding I do and marginally better tyres (I LOVED Spesh Evil Twins!).

For me individually though it's a dropper post with remote that's made the most difference. Weren't around 10 years ago (in any recognisable current form) and until I got one I didn't know I wanted one. Has changed the way I ride totally in terms of what I will take on and how confident I feel doing things. Not just for steep stuff, but I tend to drop the saddle now for everything other than just riding along or climbing - makes moving the bike around and getting it up, over and down stuff so much easier.

Having said that, can also easily see how for others lights, tyres, GPS, whatever would be more significant.

slainte 🙂 rob


 
Posted : 04/04/2012 7:27 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

its not carbon fibre....well not as it currently stands


 
Posted : 04/04/2012 7:40 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I might also put a vote in for my Garmin Edge 200, im loving it.


 
Posted : 04/04/2012 7:41 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Probably borderline ten years but bike specific 5 10s.


 
Posted : 04/04/2012 7:41 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Hydraulic disk brakes - reliable, strong and they don't eat wheels


 
Posted : 04/04/2012 7:52 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Tapered Headsets.

I can't believe how we managed before.


 
Posted : 04/04/2012 7:53 pm
Posts: 6745
Free Member
 

hmm, yeah another vote for the internet, especially combined with YouTube, Vimeo and a GoProHD. ADmitedly this has led to some pretty dull vids, but its pretty easy to create and shared decent HD vids these days.


 
Posted : 04/04/2012 7:58 pm
Posts: 13850
Free Member
 

druidh - Member
MTG - you're looking at it the wrong way round.

You can take a FLOATilla of Fatbikes into places a 10-year old bike would never reach. That's a true advance.

Like bogs, or beaches, or other, featureless places that aren't much fun to ride?


 
Posted : 04/04/2012 8:00 pm
 GEDA
Posts: 1631
Free Member
 

10 speed gearing


 
Posted : 04/04/2012 8:02 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

All the above are wrong.

The biggest advance in the last decade is the change in social acceptance, the whole 'mountain biking is the new golf' thing. It has had a far greater influence on MTBing than anything else. As MTBing has become more 'middle class', so more money has become available in the 'sport', allowing manufacturers to produce new models, or to revamp old stuff, or to flog you different colours or different sized wheels or different niches.

It's become a business, that's the difference.


 
Posted : 04/04/2012 8:05 pm
 mrmo
Posts: 10719
Free Member
 

lights... No not really was using Lumicycles a decade ago and they were fine, used Vistas before that and again fine.

Did Mountain Mayhem in c2000 when it was at Sandwell, so racing was possible.

Biggest advance of the last 10 years????? As far as bikes go, there have been no real step changes, it has been tweaks.

The biggest change is probably the internet and how it allows bikes to be used.


 
Posted : 04/04/2012 8:06 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Plus 1 for the Internet.
Not sure that mtb is the new golf though, still an obscenely uncool sport, but there's always been people
Paying a lot of money for a radder / cooler / lighter bike
Dropper post would be a good call. Where (what) I ride, I can really see the benefit and as soon as I get a job again, it'll be on my list!


 
Posted : 04/04/2012 8:10 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Lights wise, I did my first Redbull 24hr at Trentam Gardens in about '97. Lights have got better, but they aren't new


 
Posted : 04/04/2012 8:12 pm
Posts: 6252
Full Member
 

Biggest advance? Dunno, but the biggest regression has to be proliferation of standards. From basically 1 standard BB standard (well 3 but all with identical frame spec) to an array of incomprehensible standards that even wikipedia can't answer.


 
Posted : 04/04/2012 8:13 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

still an obscenely uncool sport

I wonder why that is? Road has had a lot of profile building especially in the UK etc with Cav, Sky etc but still mtb is perceived the way it is.

Or is it alway going to be inherently uncool to be riding a bike around the woods with a rucksack?


 
Posted : 04/04/2012 8:14 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I think road cycling has always been there, and has a good deal more tradition and heritage than mountain biking. Mountain biking has been led far more by fashion than road.


 
Posted : 04/04/2012 8:21 pm
Page 1 / 2