Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)
  • stem length v stretch on bike
  • darkcyan
    Free Member

    I have a conundrum!

    I like a stretched out feel on my bike. I have a new bike a yeti asr5 which feels just a tad short.

    To get the stretch i like i have the saddle as far back on the rails as possible which just about works but puts me too far over the back of the bike imo and affects the handling of the bike, specifically when climbing the steep stuff and possibly the effectiveness of the shock more generally – though not sure on this last point – just a hunch.

    Would there be any significant down side to fitting a 100 mm stem thus allowing me to move the saddle forward to poition me more over the centre of the bike while retainng the extra stretch i like.

    I do a mixture of long rides but equally do a lot of rooty technical single track, most of the time the wheels stay on the ground.

    DC

    The stem lenght is 70 mm which i have been told is a good stem length to have.

    chiefgrooveguru
    Full Member

    How wide are your bars? How tall are you?

    GW
    Free Member

    why do you like a stretched out feel on a 5″ travel full suspension mountainbike?

    crikey
    Free Member

    Um, I know this is controversial, but why not put a longer stem on?

    🙄

    RealMan
    Free Member

    Nothing wrong with 100mm. Plenty of cheap stems around, give it a go, see what happens.

    steezysix
    Free Member

    Would there be any significant down side to fitting a 100 mm stem

    It will look lame. And it may make technical descents a bit more sketchy depending on how “skill” you are. But, if it makes your bike more comfy, you just have to decide what’s more important to you.

    crashtestmonkey
    Free Member

    Current fashion is for shorter stems. The right length is the one that works for you. I ride 90mm because it feels right for me, I started riding when 130mm was the norm for XC and my first 90mm stem was marketed as a DH stem.

    Ignore fashion, laughablely regular MBR/What Bike ranting and try a longer stem.

    crikey
    Free Member

    It will look lame
    Current fashion is for shorter stems

    ..and there you have it.

    jota180
    Free Member

    Putting the saddle back to lengthen the cockpit is not ideal, you should use it only to get the correct relationship between legs and pedals
    Then change the stem to suit or buy a bigger frame

    Paceman
    Free Member

    Go for whatever you’re comfortable with as far as stem length goes Nick, no point in feeling cramped. I also think dropping your Talas forks from 140mm to 120mm would make a big difference on the climbs, and may be better elsewhere too as it’s the travel the bike was designed for. The slack angle from running the longer fork travel may also be responsible for you feeling you’re too far back over the rear wheel. Give 120mm a go up front, it’s all you need for our local trails.

    darkcyan
    Free Member

    100 mm stem now on, as is the fizik gobi and the forks are now at 120 rather than 140.

    Bike now much better – just how i like it.

    ASR5 didn’t really work for me at 140 up front – bike wasnt balanced and didnt handle the super steep climbs in stanmer well at all – very light up front.

    DC

    cynic-al
    Free Member

    Try it. I think mine’s 90 on a L old Heckler.

    Of course there’ll always be some clown to tell you what works for you is wrong.

    Oops…you did!

Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)

The topic ‘stem length v stretch on bike’ is closed to new replies.