the 3 (maybe 4 ) evil bastards sharing depraved images of babies and children .civilised society or not the bloke had already been on the sex offenders register one of the women working at a nursery just get rid of them for everyone's sake.
Chat Forum
[closed]
So why do we let these people ? live ?
-
Posted 2 years ago #
-
Yeh good shout, we should get rid of cripples too.
Posted 2 years ago # -
ANd the terminally unemployed / smackheads whilst we're at it
Posted 2 years ago # -
and oscar winning, ex-pat film directors on the run in Europe.
Posted 2 years ago # -
sorry gang...i agree with oldfart.
and i would love to be the executioner.Posted 2 years ago # -
Oldfart yes
put them down and stop the grouth of there gene pool
Posted 2 years ago # -
Bang on Oldfart.
At a bare minimum, chemical castration. I dont give a flying fook about their rights... they dont deserve to live. Fookin defects, human defects.
I hope to hell they get tortured in prison.
Posted 2 years ago # -
wtf is up with them? Im with OP if they want to live like animals put them all on an island they can live like animals and murder and abuse each other, its the very least they deserve.
Posted 2 years ago # -
So why do we let these people ? live ?
Because we are more civilised than them.
Posted 2 years ago # -
Why does everyone assume I was being sarcastic? I'm with the OP.
Granted the terminally unemployed may be debatable but I'm sure there's some who offer nothing to society, as do a number of junkies.
Posted 2 years ago # -
I also agree, I also would add a load more to the list as well. Time for a clear up.
Posted 2 years ago # -
El-bent - Member
So why do we let these people ? live ?
Because we are more civilised than them.
people like you make me very angry...and i do not get angry very often.
if you son/daughter was abused by some perv, how would you feel then.they should die for what they do. moreso when done to kids.
Posted 2 years ago # -
people like you make me very angry...and i do not get angry very often.
if you son/daughter was abused by some perv, how would you feel then.blah, Blah, bloody, blah. Don't try and get the state to sanction your bloodlust.
Posted 2 years ago # -
El-bent -
just out of interestwhat do you deem a good punishment???Posted 2 years ago # -
el-bent
if you son/daughter was abused by some perv, how would you feel then.
how about a answer
Posted 2 years ago # -
yer and old people, they just waste our medical supplies with all their ailments and block us from doing anything as they are always in the way. Bloody wing a lot too.
Posted 2 years ago # -
they should die for what they do. moreso when done to kids.
I wouldn't disagree, but from the practical point of view, given the string of miscarriages of justice that have happened in the past and will continue in the future, what percentage of innocent people being killed by the state would you find acceptable so that the guilty can be killed?Posted 2 years ago # -
I think we should slaughter the kids instead, then we wouldnt have this problem
Posted 2 years ago # -
Ian Munro
like i asked elbent.........
what would you do??Posted 2 years ago # -
they don't need punishment, they need help and rehabilitation.
Punishment after the event serves no purpose except to fuel a culture of blame and revenge.......Posted 2 years ago # -
hilldodger - Member
they don't need punishment, they need help and rehabilitation.
Punishment after the event serves no purpose except to fuel a culture of blame and revenge.......shame on you......
you soft lefty fool.Posted 2 years ago # -
I'm stunned that anyone who put these people on a par with someone who is umemployed or disabled.
But it does explain why the country is in the state it is
Posted 2 years ago # -
just out of interestwhat do you deem a good punishment???
I think they should be locked up. I also think we should try and understand what makes these people behave in such a way.If we understand the causes or triggers which lead them to do these things we could also hold the key to undoing it or better still preventing it from happening again.
History has taught us that execution does not resolve these types of conditions, sickness or whatever else you want to call it. If you would like your children to be safe from people like this then we need to prevent the next person from committing this crime again as well as preventing these people from doing it again.
Posted 2 years ago # -
Not really Ton,
retributive punishment would not help prevent further crimes of this nature.
The 'people' who commit them are undoubtedly repulsive beyond our comprehension, but the prospect of 'death if caught' would just raise the thrill factor of what, to them, is just a big game.Posted 2 years ago # -
BillyWhizz - Member
I'm stunned that anyone who put these people on a par with someone who is umemployed or disabled.But it does explain why the country is in the state it is
this was not me.
but people who commit sickening crimes against babies should die for what they do.
nothing anyone say's would make me change my mind.Posted 2 years ago # -
'm stunned that anyone who put these people on a par with someone who is umemployed or disabled.
But it does explain why the country is in the state it is
Yes. quite.
Posted 2 years ago # -
they don't need punishment, they need help and rehabilitation.
I hope that is a trolling post.
Posted 2 years ago # -
The prospect of "death if caught" would also be a good incentive to get rid of any witnesses - permanently.
Surely the use of the death penalty in (some of) the USA teaches us that this sanction does not lead to a decrease in crime?
Posted 2 years ago # -
but people who commit sickening crimes against babies should die for what they do.
nothing anyone say's would make me change my mind.But why limit it to babies ?
Posted 2 years ago # -
Executing them has got nothing to do with providing a deterent. Its more like a Risk assessment. Remove the risk.
Posted 2 years ago # -
What we need is some sort of 'Minority Report' type justice for these people
Posted 2 years ago # -
perpertrators of abuse tend do have been victims in their youth (so i hear)
should they be put down because they were fuct up at an exceptionally vulnerablle time when their social and sexual personalities were developing
and fwiw
my aunt tried to kill herself a few years ago after suffering a breakdown, after therapy had unearthed abuse in her past
the police realised they had been looking for her for some time as a co-witness against the abuser(a helper at her local church and friend of the family)
her mental health has deteriorated she is now in and out of institutions and my cousins have had to grow up watching their mum fall aparti really dont know what id do if i ever met the *%^! in a dark alley
Posted 2 years ago # -
lowey - Member
hope that is a trolling post.No, just my opinion - some think that society should kill those whose actions are deemed unacceptable - others that, hard though it may be to comprehend, there is no positive outcome for a society that has institutionalised killing as part of its justice system.
Posted 2 years ago # -
lowey - Member
Executing them has got nothing to do with providing a deterent. Its more like a Risk assessment. Remove the risk.Something is only a 'risk' before the event, not after.
Posted 2 years ago # -
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wK_3I0MiAP8&feature=related
would this make you happy, ton et al?Posted 2 years ago #
Topic Closed
This topic has been closed to new replies.
