For the shimano haters, as a comparison, how do shimano fare against other foreign large scale manufacturers of equivalent parts?
So Hope do well on warranty and spares (we all know this because their stuff seems to break a fair bit), but they distribute themselves, so it’s pretty easy for them to send out spares rather than get a distributor to hold spares and do so). A true test (in comparison with shimano) would be how they do abroad – which we know nothing about.
Lots of other wee UK manufacturers fall precisely into this category.
Sram – is their spares situation any better or worse than Shimano?
Magura? Formula?
Campag? – You used to be able to get everything but it was ****ing expensive, but I understand the UK spares supply route is now different (i.e. not Mercian)
Madison stock IMO/E a HUGE number of shimano spares, given the vast number of shimano products available. We have no idea if this due to intentional designer obselesence on the the part of shimano, or Madison not wanting to have another warehouse full of spares they may still have in 20 years, or something else.
It’s true that shimano (and sram, Hope, Campag and many others) do change stuff frequently for no performance benefit (as well as introducing many benefits that no small manufacturer could have done – SPD, indexing etc). To blame them alone for that is naive IMO – many consumers want to be sold the newest thing…not just at the lower end but look at the no. of folk on here who are buying newer/more expensive kit that genuinely has no benefit to them whatsoever.
There almost endeth my musings…it’s simply not as simple as HOPE = GOOD, SHIMANO = BAD, and, if I dare, THE WORLD IS SHADES OF GREY AND NOT BLACK AND WHITE[/b].