Ahhh I see, Those nozzles are for the "Wet" test I presume then, so the test has no representative air flow, and the test cycle is a short sweet few pulls on each lever to produce some pretty lines to shove in the comics...
From having worked in Development test Labs on power tools in a previous job I can tell you that shite would never have flown, repeated on/off under load cycles run day and night you could get through a products entire expected working life in 24-72 hours depending on the product and the operation, monitoring key component temperatures and ambient (as a base line), basically mechanical torture is required to get any idea of performance over an extended period simulating environment in a Lab isn't too tricky either but you have to think a bit laterally, for instance what is the true value of their "wet" test? do they include any aggregate material in the water jets? I've yet to go on a wet ride and not get muddy silty water splashed all over the shop very seldom do you get lovely clear water, while your at it the odd damp road ride will probably mean a it of oil/diesel gets mixed in with it too...
As for their lovely linear braking lines produced using just 3 lever force settings, why are they not forcing it to put up with a mixture of low force dragging and sudden high force jabs? far more representative of many riders use of the brakes probably...
Did they measure pad thickness before, part way through and after the tests? did they bollocks... 10 "bedding cycles" and 9 dry/9 wet pulls is hardly a conclusive test, I doubt that Fibrax would be so lax in their own real product testing, it's just a bit of cheap magazine filler...
