I have had a brand new Meta and a 456 with trick bits.
I have also had a rattly 456 and I have just started riding an old Meta..this one doesn’t have bells/ whistles. It does have a coil shock shoehorned in and some heavy bombers. And it works!
Have to say I love this Meta much more than the new one I had 18 months ago (I am experiencing “best bike ever” syndrome and it was the same for the 456.)
Anyone else prefer their cheap ‘un to their pricey one??
6 years old. Only recently upgraded from original rigid fork to 5 year old Bombers (for £35!). Been SS for years, but now 1×9. Gnarrified with wide bars, short stem and big tyres. Held together by stickers, duct tape and rust.
Last bike was a khaki coloured kona stinky with missing paint and other proof of “offs” … just switched to a chrome looking Scott ransom … I guess this sides me with the shiny folk?
I know the dilema… for me I built and upgraded my old bike on the cheap and have ridden it for 5 yrs – it’s an old friend. The shiny new bike albeit faster, lighter etc etc just doesn’t have the attachment of the old bike yet. I’m sure it’ll catch up over the summer!
Posted 13 years ago
Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
The topic ‘Rough bike vs Shiny Bike’ is closed to new replies.