That’s a really interesting and insightful question and it’s not escaped my notice either. Even more interesting is that I wasn’t previously aware that this is my default/unconscious preference until just recently and it’s something I’ve been thinking about.
The answer I’ve come up with so far (and this would actually make a really good blog post so thanks for bringing it up) is twofold.
First I think that my strong preference is for something that shows the person; the whole person and that person in some sort of context. I think that posture and the way a person holds themselves is a big part of conveying who they are. It’s not quite ‘environmental portraiture’ although that is something that really does interest me, but it’s not far off. I also think that with close in head shots, it’s too easy for the emphasis to shift from ‘the person’ to the lighting, the glamour the technical aspects etc.
The second reason is much more personal and relates to the vulnerability of self.
I suspect I have a problem with intimacy; I connect but not too closely. That’s perhaps too personal to ellaborate on but it is something that is the product of my childhood (which I reference in the blog) and something that a close family member, who is a very eminent and published psychologist, has also commented on.
I’ll do a follow up blog post. Drop me an email either through here or the site and I will let you know when it’s up.
Thankyou – that was a startling comment with real insight.